delete

silverman68 · August 23, 2011 2:30AM

delete

Tdec1000 · August 23, 2011 2:38AM

Weaky struck reverse, I say MS-64! Nice coin

silverman68 · August 23, 2011 2:41AM

<< Weaky struck reverse, I say MS-64! Nice coin >>

From what I have seen and read the 02 is a pretty ugly strike anyway. I'm I correct is saying that?

blu62vette · August 23, 2011 3:19AM

<< 

<< Weaky struck reverse, I say MS-64! Nice coin >>

From what I have seen and read the 02 is a pretty ugly strike anyway. I'm I correct is saying that? >>

The 1902 is an ugly strike and ugly year. Very few PL's and they are hazy/cloudy normally. Yours seems nice, a little hard to grade from the photo but looks around a 63/64.

coinandcurrency242 · August 23, 2011 3:20AM

I would say MS 63 due to the marks!

ricko · August 23, 2011 3:50AM

Grade from a photograph....MS63... Cheers, RickO

kryptonitecomics · August 23, 2011 3:52AM

Tough to tell from those photo's, would need to see a larger more detailed view as it looks pretty clean from what I can see so it might be a MS64.

hammered54 · August 23, 2011 4:02AM

to bad it's not an Ike.....it'd be a 69

silverman68 · August 23, 2011 4:26AM

Should have a grade in a couple weeks. Will update when known.

relicsncoins · August 23, 2011 4:29AM

My guess is, 64 or 64+ from the photos.

greghansen · August 23, 2011 4:46AM

I like it as a 64; would love it as a 63 and wouldn't want anything to do with it as a 65.

AUandAG · August 23, 2011 4:48AM

No clue but the carpet is nice. Put the coin on a solid colored surface and retake and the
camera will focus on the coin not the background.

bob

silverman68 · August 23, 2011 5:03AM

<< No clue but the carpet is nice. Put the coin on a solid colored surface and retake and the
camera will focus on the coin not the background.

bob >>

lol, good one, but it's a towel. Would follow your advice but its getting graded. I have 39 more if this one gets something reasonable.

coinkat · August 23, 2011 7:59AM

I like it and it looks minimum 63 and possibly a 64- and those that wrote that the 02 P is a tough year for quality are right- this is a keeper

LeeBone · August 23, 2011 8:03AM

My guess 64

roadrunner · August 23, 2011 8:22AM

Seems clean enough to me to grade MS65. But hard to say how blasty it is and whether any grade-limiting hairlines might be there.

roadrunner

johnperk747 · August 23, 2011 9:08AM

Should have "pulled the trigger" and sent in 10 coins!!
(2x65, 5x64 & 3x63)

Real nice coin!!

Best of luck

Blessings

Myqqy · August 23, 2011 10:05AM

From what i can see- my bet would be a frosty 64 for this date- i love the earlier morgans a lot more than the later years, and still i can't seem to get rid of any of mine.

SeattleSlammer · August 23, 2011 10:25AM

As usual many members are guessing "63" and yet none of them could show you a pic of a "63" Morgan that looks as clean as yours (at least as seen in your small pics). Apparently the fortunate members here have 63s that look like 65s, and god knows what their 65s look like!

coinkid855 · August 23, 2011 11:16AM

I say it's a very nice 64.

-Paul

coinkat · August 23, 2011 11:18AM

Keep in mind that we are looking at the image of the coin and not the coin itself- I don't have the ability to tilt the coin to look for hairlines or see how distracting any possible issues may be- I like the coin and said 63 minimum and possibly 64- If it were my coin, I would send it in anticipating the graders will appreciate that this is a terrific coin for the date and hope for the best

BaronVonBaugh · August 23, 2011 1:17PM

I have seen lots of 64s that did not look that good and some 65s also.

64+, maybe 65

silverman68 · August 23, 2011 3:42PM

My pics are kinda bad and don't show the true image of the coin but it's all I have for now. The obverse is very nice in my opinion and thank you all for the replies.

MercCrazy · August 23, 2011 3:44PM

Id say 64 with a 50% shot at a +.

HighRelief · August 23, 2011 4:21PM

I like it as a 64

silverman68 · September 3, 2011 5:11AM

Updated with grade, ms65+
Sent in 2 and the other is ms65.

CoinCrazyPA · September 3, 2011 7:52AM

Wow, good for you congrat's on he grade.

IrishMikey · September 3, 2011 8:07AM

You at least have a nice list of board members that you might want to buy some MS-63 Morgan dollars
from! As clean as that cheek is, it would need some pretty serious hairlines to grade 63. Congratulations
on your 65+ grade.

ziggy29 · September 3, 2011 8:25AM

<< As clean as that cheek is, it would need some pretty serious hairlines to grade 63. >>

Either that or the date would have to jump 10x in value from 63 to 64. This one doesn't.

coinkat · September 3, 2011 9:14AM

congrats

relicsncoins · September 4, 2011 3:47PM

Nice.........Good eye.

Tdec1000 · September 5, 2011 3:23AM

Way to go....this coin must look much better than your pics....

BillJones · September 5, 2011 3:38AM

I'd say MS-64. The luster appears to be a bit hazy. "Blast white" seems to cover a lot of sins (marks) when it comes to slab grades. Quite or hazy coins end up losing a point or two. Given the low number of marks it could get a low end MS-65, but the odds are against it.

Wabbit2313 · September 5, 2011 4:54AM

Was it in the sucure holder?

roadrunner · September 5, 2011 4:57AM

Even with the grade posted it seems it's still hard to convince the crowd it's not a 63 or 64........

Congrats on your grade.

roadrunner

silverman68 · September 5, 2011 1:04PM

If I can get good pics in the holder I will post them when coin arrives in the next week or so.

delete

Comments

Leave a Comment