None look original- and each looks to have been played with. With that in mind I would choose the 1806 based on looks alone. price is a different matter
All are PCGS AU53 CAC... the photos were taken by the same person.
I can't tell, but the 1800 looks to be the most original, the 1806 may have had a quick dip and the 1807 looks to have had a long (or multiple) dip(s)?
The Heraldic Eagle design in gold from that era of history...all are very cool. BUT, those photos leave a lot to be desired. Assuming the grades are about the same you are looking at about the same value I think. From the photos they look to be close in grade...but just by going off the photos...assuming it is problem free I would go with 1806...stinks it has the highest mintage though. I guess I would go for quality but if it is ONLY the scratched holder and terrible lighting then 1800 would be the choice.
1806.
"If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64 Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
The 1806 would have been my choice, but that scratch across the head is very bothersome. The 1807 has lots of detail, but the coin appears to lack any luster (flat), and appears to have been dipped. My final vote went to the 1800... Plenty of details remain, and has that original AU surface.
Agree. Looks like the most original skin of the three coins. We need better pics though.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I would not buy any of those without more info and better pictures, these are too expensive to make a mistake on. PCGS AU53 is often a net graded AU55, for various reasons. Have Doug WInter search for the right coin, it might take a while, be patient.
Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty - biography of US Mint's first chief engraver
I agree with the comment regarding having pictures of all the coins taken under the same conditions. Having said that my order of preference is 1806, 1800, 1807.
The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
I picked the 1800 because it looked to have the mnost original surfaces with some luster popping through as well. The color looks right with a more 2-tone appearance between the luster and the other parts of the coin.
The 1806 looks lightly cleaned or dipped and really can't be sure about the 1807 but it looks odd as well.
Comments
<< <i>No one could say from those images. Well, they could say, but their answers would not be very meaningful. >>
That's the best I have to work with John...
P.S. If you sold more, I would have better images!
P.S.S. The coins on your website are in reverse order?
<< <i>
<< <i>No one could say from those images. Well, they could say, but their answers would not be very meaningful. >>
That's the best I have to work with John...
They are not good enough to allow someone to give you an answer that is actionable, so I'm not sure I see the point.
<< <i>P.S.S. The coins on your website are in reverse order?
Yes.
<< <i>
They are not good enough to allow someone to give you an answer that is actionable, so I'm not sure I see the point.
>>
Those are the images I have to work with to make my decision... just want a second opinion.
Successful Transactions With: JoeLewis, Mkman123, Harry779, Grote15, gdavis70, Kryptonitecomics
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
<< <i>Those are the images I have to work with to make my decision... just want a second opinion. >>
My decision would be to pass on all three if those images were all I had to work with.
<< <i>My decision would be to pass on all three if those images were all I had to work with. >>
from what's given, if you said Choose One, I'd probably take the 1806
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
the color the first coin and the third coin looks dull and dipped
out. However, I hope there is a good return policy because gold
coins are a very tricky deal indeed, when they are raw. If graded
by PCGS, I would feel much more comfortable.
Camelot
<< <i>
<< <i>Those are the images I have to work with to make my decision... just want a second opinion. >>
My decision would be to pass on all three if those images were all I had to work with. >>
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
With that in mind I would choose the 1806 based on looks alone.
price is a different matter
it's just a hunch..if any of those were good stuff, good photos just might follow. those photos truly leave much to be desired.
I can't tell, but the 1800 looks to be the most original, the 1806 may have had a quick dip and the 1807 looks to have had a long (or multiple) dip(s)?
<< <i>Gotta go with 1806 >>
Based on the images - me as well.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
1806.
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
My final vote went to the 1800... Plenty of details remain, and has that original AU surface.
<< <i>1807 looks nice. >>
Agree. Looks like the most original skin of the three coins. We need better pics though.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
between the luster and the other parts of the coin.
The 1806 looks lightly cleaned or dipped and really can't be sure about the 1807 but it looks odd as well.
roadrunner