Yea, I'd say that the 1949 half dollar is a replacement coin. It's got a little toning around the edge, but it's not been in there for very long IMO.
To be honest I bought a 1952 mint set years ago that was missing on of the 1952-S half dollas. It had been pulled to go into a slab according to the dealer from whom I bought the set. I bought a replacement coin at the same show in it put in the mint set cardboard and paper holder. After I held the set for seven years, you couldn't tell the dfference between the replacement coin and the original pieces.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Could me more going on here than meets the eye....
It doesn't look like the quarters match the dimes and toned half. If I were a betting man I'd say either you've got quarters from one set, dimes and half from another, and the last half is a recent replacement.
Or, the dimes and half was dipped, and the quarters were not for some reason. The toning on the quarters looks original and 60 years old.
Sorry, but that set has been messed with. No way it's an original set as the toning does not match up correctly. I've look at hundrends of sets and I wouldn't touch that one as original.
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." Will Rogers
However Chumley, I would be lieing if I didn't admit to buying a number of double mint sets over the years, even ones that were messed with or broken up... for just one coin.
Plus, when someone else has messed up a set, they've already taken the charma hit and you're cherrypicking (if that's what you want) is entirely guilt free!!
I agree with Coppercolor . . . I have purchased 4 or 5 Mint Sets just to get the colored Lincolns (apologies to RickO). But at least the sets were original and I could sell the remainders with a clear conscience. In this case, they certainly do not appear to be original, at least not like the few that I have seen that I know were . .
Frankly, the 1949s never seem to tone well. I would have a difficult time rationalizing the huge price when it really seems challenging to determine originality.
Kudos to those who do and pay the huge premium for the original (?) Mint Set.
Comments
Barrytrot(2),Stupid,Savoyspecial,docq,ecoinquest, halfhunter,snman,Coll3ctor.
wondercoin. Blue594. internetjunky.
keepdachange. Scrapman1077.Ahrensdad, mrmom, mygrandeoso, blu62vette, Clackamas,giorgio11, adriana, cucamongacoin,
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
To be honest I bought a 1952 mint set years ago that was missing on of the 1952-S half dollas. It had been pulled to go into a slab according to the dealer from whom I bought the set. I bought a replacement coin at the same show in it put in the mint set cardboard and paper holder. After I held the set for seven years, you couldn't tell the dfference between the replacement coin and the original pieces.
It doesn't look like the quarters match the dimes and toned half. If I were a betting man I'd say either you've got quarters from one set, dimes and half from another, and the last half is a recent replacement.
Or,
the dimes and half was dipped, and the quarters were not for some reason. The toning on the quarters looks original and 60 years old.
<< <i>Those coins look just plain DIRTY. Cheers, RickO >>
Plus, when someone else has messed up a set, they've already taken the charma hit and you're cherrypicking (if that's what you want) is entirely guilt free!!
Frankly, the 1949s never seem to tone well. I would have a difficult time rationalizing the huge price when it really seems challenging to determine originality.
Kudos to those who do and pay the huge premium for the original (?) Mint Set.
Drunner
(Buyer of Mint Set Doilies)