I like the coin. It has alot of detail left with no major blemishes. ( Based on those pics.) It has been dipped in the past. Reverse toning looks somewhat normal for secondary toning.
The obverse toning doesn't look very natural. Could be the pics.
Not the type of coin I look for but many people would like it.
Of course that coin has been dipped. Those colors don't develop like this on original silver skin 190 or so years old. That said - what a nice coin. I really wish that coin with all that dipping/secondary toning was in my collection
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
looks like it has 55 or better details ... the angle and brightness of the picture, and that fact it's a picture and not a coin I could inspect in hand at this moment ... doesn't help with whether I think it would grade or not
if a dipping is the worst of her issues, she's likely to go 55 or better IMO
and she is a good looker!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
This old quarter is very nice! Love the duce, duce....I had the most beautiful 22 half dollar and sold it like an IDIOT!!!!.....Very pretty Quarter, wish it were mine
The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Mostly agree with previous responses, coin has wonderful detail, clearly AU. Dipped but not scrubbed, the secondary toning is quite colorful but somewhat unfortunately uneven; A coin that might improve from several years in an album or envelope (but might not). There are a few handling marks but not significant wear, first approximation AU55, but would like to see the coin in hand and tilted in the light, or at least more pictures taken in different light and from different angles. Could easily be 58, and actually, as high as MS62 wouldn't completely shock me in this day and age. Lower than 55 or higher than 62 would be quite surprising.
Far from original but very nice. I agree with most other responses. The quarter has been dipped and possibly cleaned. I like the toning on the reverse but the obverse toning seems unnatural. Overall a good coin and a nice find.
Comments
Gary
Gary
It has been dipped in the past. Reverse toning looks somewhat normal for secondary toning.
The obverse toning doesn't look very natural. Could be the pics.
Not the type of coin I look for but many people would like it.
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
That said - what a nice coin.
I really wish that coin with all that dipping/secondary toning was in my collection
looks like it has 55 or better details ... the angle and brightness of the picture, and that fact it's a picture and not a coin I could inspect in hand at this moment ... doesn't help with whether I think it would grade or not
if a dipping is the worst of her issues, she's likely to go 55 or better IMO
and she is a good looker!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
of all time! Render to Caesar's what is
Caesars and give to God what is God's.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Tom