We used to collect uncirculated coins and proof coins, but the proof coins looked too perfect so we decided to only collect coins that were minted for circulation in uncirculated condition.
We didn't want to collect coins that were minted specifically for collectors: proof coins, satin finish coins, medals, commemoratives, bullion, etc.
Regretfully, for my son to be competitve with his sister in the Registry, we had to purchase two collector coins (Millennium and Goodacre SACs); hopefully BJ will create a 2000 Mint Set that only requires circulating coins soon and we can dump these two collector coins.
I only collect proofs. I like the rarity, reflectivity, and greater striking detail. Also, counter-intuitively, many 19th Century coins are less expensive as proofs than as business strikes.
In the classic era I collect circulated coins. In the modern era my preference is uncirculated circulation coins, with some proofs and the collectors mint set coins.
I would prefer to collect coins used as a medium of exchange only. This means the coins were originally available for face value. However in getting involved with proof artwork on business strikes, I have added a few proof pieces for comparasion purposes. Then we also have the case of circulation artwork on a proof coin.
I collect coins in the highest grades that I can afford. Therefore I answered circulated, uncirculated and Proof. When they are available I prefer Proof coins to Uncirculated pieces. I think that Proof coins show the artwork better in most cases, and when it comes to modern coins, they are much cheaper than Mint State pieces in high grade.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>I don't care for proofs. The idea of collecting something that was specifically made to be collected has never been for me. >>
This is about how I feel but would add that I like a few proofs here and there for affect. Also I love well used coins as it shows that they slipped through some hands as they were intended to on their way to me.
As a general rule I collect business strikes in the XF-AU range but I do occasionally go for mint state pieces. I will go into lower grades if the ideal grades are too expensive. I am generally not interested in proofs/NCLT. They just don't seem like real coins to me. Yes, I know, it's just my opinion but there it is!
You know, that's a good question, as I actually like circulated coins, now, but was kind of ashamed, on a big board like this, to mention it. I do have a certain kinship, though, I guess. That is to say, I'm kind of circulated, now, myself.
<< <i>As a general rule I collect business strikes in the XF-AU range but I do occasionally go for mint state pieces. I will go into lower grades if the ideal grades are too expensive. I am generally not interested in proofs/NCLT. They just don't seem like real coins to me. Yes, I know, it's just my opinion but there it is! >>
Not just your opinion; it's mine also.
Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
No hard and fast rule, but I find VF-30 to AU to be my sweet spot. It also depends on the type; I prefer the look of nice, original VF Barber Halves more than the choice AUs. They "age" gracefully.
<< <i>You know, that's a good question, as I actually like circulated coins, now, but was kind of ashamed, on a big board like this, to mention it. >>
NEVER BE ASHAMED!!! Although I collect mint state coins, I believe there's something honorable about collecting circulated pieces. Imagining who may have held a coin that has obvious wear has a romance unto itself.
I have no preference in which type. However, I really like older(mid 19th century and older) circulated coins so I can speculate that someone special may have handled them.
Mostly XF-AU in my 2 main series(see sigline) Unc. only in the more common stuff like Morgans and Peace $(not currently active in these series).I don't care for modern proofs but love 1800's proof coins.
Comments
We didn't want to collect coins that were minted specifically for collectors: proof coins, satin finish coins, medals, commemoratives, bullion, etc.
Regretfully, for my son to be competitve with his sister in the Registry, we had to purchase two collector coins (Millennium and Goodacre SACs); hopefully BJ will create a 2000 Mint Set that only requires circulating coins soon and we can dump these two collector coins.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
In the modern era my preference is uncirculated circulation coins, with some proofs and the collectors mint set coins.
<< <i>I don't care for proofs. The idea of collecting something that was specifically made to be collected has never been for me. >>
Yep! I also greatly prefer dirty, circulated stuff.... "Mint" coins are a bit sterile to me.
Proofs I sell
Glen
However, I learned early-on that I can live quite well with dirty, circulated examples of a lot of things.
INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan
Not to dismiss Proofs- I have a few- nothing great
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>I don't care for proofs. The idea of collecting something that was specifically made to be collected has never been for me. >>
This is about how I feel but would add that I like a few proofs here and there for affect. Also I love well used coins as it shows that they slipped through some hands as they were intended to on their way to me.
Tom
i like them in AU as someone likely thought to save it when they came across it.
<< <i>Circulated coins. Alot have stories to tell. >>
<< <i>As a general rule I collect business strikes in the XF-AU range but I do occasionally go for mint state pieces. I will go into lower grades if the ideal grades are too expensive. I am generally not interested in proofs/NCLT. They just don't seem like real coins to me. Yes, I know, it's just my opinion but there it is! >>
Not just your opinion; it's mine also.
<< <i>I would love to collect proof coins, but proof Bust Half Dollars do not fit into my budget. >>
I was the underbidder on a proof bust half at Heritage recently and sometimes wish that I had purchased it.
<< <i>You know, that's a good question, as I actually like circulated coins, now, but was kind of ashamed, on a big board like this, to mention it. >>
NEVER BE ASHAMED!!! Although I collect mint state coins, I believe there's something honorable about collecting circulated pieces. Imagining who may have held a coin that has obvious wear has a romance unto itself.
Hoard the keys.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress