Options
I don't agree with this grade.


This must be the nicest MS-61 on the planet! Most MS-61 coins I've seen look like they've been through the meat grinder, or have some distracting marks, blemishes, or just a very weak strike. This coin is quite beautiful, well stuck and has pretty good luster......I just don't get it?
The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
0
Comments
The name is LEE!
1- That's not a horrendous strike, but it's weak. Look at the buffalo's shoulder.
2- The obverse fields seem much brighter than the portrait. Lustre should be present throughout, and if only the fields have it, that's often a grade killer. The obverse fields look to have slightly uneven lustre, too, with what look like drab, lifeless patches.
It's a very attractive piece, but it's not perfect. I feel like seeing it in hand could easily sway me to much more strongly agree/disagree with the grade.
2- The obverse fields seem much brighter than the portrait. Lustre should be present throughout, and if only the fields have it, that's often a grade killer. The obverse fields look to have slightly uneven lustre, too, with what look like drab, lifeless patches.
It's a very attractive piece, but it's not perfect. I feel like seeing it in hand could easily sway me to much more strongly agree/disagree with the grade. >>
I agree that these issues might knock it down from a 65 to 63, but 61. no way!
Not the best date to compare, but here I have an MS-65 & an MS-62....Quite a big difference between the two. I know the 1934-d is known for bad strikes, but one is a MS-62, the 14-D is a 61.
<< <i>I don't agree with this grade. >>
Nor do I.
And by the way, I've NEVER seen a 34-D struck from such an eroded die like the 62 you showed. That's an amazing piece.
Perhaps they saw a rub on the Indian's cheek. There is a break in the toning there.
The toning looks atractive to me but it in fact could of been what held you back??
<< <i>Just curious but what did you think it should of graded?
The toning looks attractive to me but it in fact could of been what held you back?? >>
I really don't think anyone would complain if this coin was in a 63 holder, and that was the grade I was expecting at the least.... But what do I know.
<< <i>Is there a counting wheel mark on the coin? >>
I don't think they had counting machines back then but I could be wrong.
Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
<< <i>
<< <i>Is there a counting wheel mark on the coin? >>
I don't think they had counting machines back then but I could be wrong. >>
I sure don't see one, in fact it doesn't really have many marks at all...
How do you guys feel about this as a 61?
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
<< <i>
<< <i>Is there a counting wheel mark on the coin? >>
I don't think they had counting machines back then but I could be wrong. >>
Yes, this coin could have been through a counting machine, but there does not appear to be any counting machine marks on the coin based on the images.
<< <i>.....i gotta agree with it having an A.U'ish quality that the graders compromised on and gave it a 61 >>
Over graded, I hate it when that happens...
<< <i>How do you guys feel about this as a 61?
I like that 61! Great luster and over all nice eye appeal....
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Is there a counting wheel mark on the coin? >>
I don't think they had counting machines back then but I could be wrong. >>
Yes, this coin could have been through a counting machine, but there does not appear to be any counting machine marks on the coin based on the images. >>
How do you figure? Did they have mechanized counting machines in 1914 or even 1915 for that matter?
Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
<< <i>I'm so sorry for your loss. Prayer sent. >>
That one made me laugh out loud. Bravo!
<< <i>
<< <i>Just curious but what did you think it should of graded?
The toning looks attractive to me but it in fact could of been what held you back?? >>
I really don't think anyone would complain if this coin was in a 63 holder, and that was the grade I was expecting at the least.... But what do I know. >>
What do you know CHD?
It's your series (and I respect you opinion on buffs CHD :ThumbsUp
I just hate some of the replys in this thread, there seems to be way to many people talking about something they know very little about.... "weak strike here or weak strike there", "counting wheel marks" and "rub here" or "rub there", blah, blah, BLAH! I say RUB ON THIS!
Rant over and I think 61 ain't even close.
Cheers,
Ray
Nice lookin coin!!!
BST Transactions: DonnyJf, MrOrganic, Justanothercoinaddict, Fivecents, Slq, Jdimmick,
Robb, Tee135, Ibzman350, Mercfan, Outhaul, Erickso1, Cugamongacoins, Indiananationals, Wayne Herndon
Negative BST Transactions:
<< <i>How do you guys feel about this as a 61?
That looks like an super AU8 worth MS61 money to me. Great coin never the less
<< <i>How do you figure? Did they have mechanized counting machines in 1914 or even 1915 for that matter? >>
I know this is getting progressively offtopic, but I think one can safely assume that a counting machine mark could have been added to a coin well after the date of issue.....just because a coin was minted in 1914, doesn't mean it may not have gone through some type of mechanized counter years later. Some coins sit in bags, rolls, etc for many years before entering the channels of circulation. And there were a number of mechanized nickel machines in use prior to 1900....Wurlitzer and Mills Novelty issued various 5 cent music machines, slot machines, etc. that could impart mechanical damage to a newly minted nickel in 1914.
<< <i>I'll leave my choice words out of the thread so as not to go off topic. Needless to say, I think PCGS hosed you. >>
I agree with you!! I would send it back in again in a few months.
Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
<< <i>
<< <i>I'll leave my choice words out of the thread so as not to go off topic. Needless to say, I think PCGS hosed you. >>
I agree with you!! I would send it back in again in a few months. >>
Won't the grading fees and postage pretty much chew up any price differential if it grades a point or two higher?
Here are some images of the same coin when I bought it raw. This really is a beautiful coin, one of my favorite Buffs, and I have a lot of um..... Just look at how square and nice the rims are , and the planchet is gorgeous. Just a very nice coin all the way around...
<< <i>That sure is one crappy looking coin CHD.
Thanks....I love the look of this crappy MS-61....
Hoard the keys.
<< <i>Quite simple actually: PCGS did not want to guarantee the grade at more than the cost of an MS61. >>
That's not grading, it's guaranteeing.
Tell you the truth, these TPGs don't know what they're doing from one minute to the next, their marketing just has everybody brain-stuffed into believing they do because they know that's the game we all love to play. That coin, from a technical standpoint, alone, is an easy MS63-64. As far as the soft strike goes, strike doesn't play in the technical grade.
<< <i>
<< <i>Quite simple actually: PCGS did not want to guarantee the grade at more than the cost of an MS61. >>
That's not grading, it's guaranteeing.
Tell you the truth, these TPGs don't know what they're doing from one minute to the next, their marketing just has everybody brain-stuffed into believing they do because they know that's the game we all love to play. That coin, from a technical standpoint, alone, is an easy MS63-64. As far as the soft strike goes, strike doesn't play in the technical grade. >>
<< <i>
<< <i>How do you guys feel about this as a 61?
That looks like an super AU8 worth MS61 money to me. Great coin never the less >>
<< <i>Here's one I once owned that I had bought raw and sent to Pcgs(expecting a 66)It came back 64.Most likely your coin was held back by the muted luster as was my coin.Your coin is definately better than 61 as far as the technical grade goes and I love the look of it.I eventually sold my coin for about 2X MS-66 money while still in a 64 holder
MAN!! That's one GORGEOUS Buffalo Nickel! No way is that a 64