Which of these 1894 2 1/2 libs do you like better?
Why?
They are both graded MS 65


They are both graded MS 65


I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
0
Comments
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>The obverse of the first one appears to have a fairly significant pitting issue near the third star, is this correct? >>
I do not have the coin in hand so cannot comment on your question.
Relicsncoins, the second one is PL....good eye!
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
<< <i>The obverse of the first one appears to have a fairly significant pitting issue near the third star, is this correct?[/qMight be something from the die :?
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
<< <i>2nd. BUT! It is hard to judge them fairly when the photos of the first clearly do not measure up to the quality photos of the second. >>
<< <i>
<< <i>2nd. BUT! It is hard to judge them fairly when the photos of the first clearly do not measure up to the quality photos of the second. >>
Visit my son's caringbridge page @ Runner's Caringbridge Page
"To Give Anything Less than Your Best, Is to Sacrifice the Gift" - Steve Prefontaine
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>Posted apart from each other in GTG threads, I would have given coin #1 a lower grade than coin #2. Coin #2 looks PL, but I can't say that coin #1 doesn't. >>
Coin one has original color to me.....coin 2, although prooflike and reflective I think has been dipped at one time.
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
Images do not tell the entire story of a coins true quality.
<< <i>How can you tell via an image? The second coin clearly looks NCS'd, but with out it in hand its hard to confirm. This would explain why the coin might be Pl.
Images do not tell the entire story of a coins true quality. >>
How does NCS'd make a coin PL?
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
I hate white spots on the rims!
Even under the diff lighting conditions the first coin looks like it was MS70'd and the 2nd one has an interesting cameo/PL look.
roadrunner
<< <i>I'd have to go with the 2nd one. The first one has too much rev field chatter which imo keeps from being an honest 65...not to mention the planchet flake that TomB pointed out.
Even under the diff lighting conditions the first coin looks like it was MS70'd and the 2nd one has an interesting cameo/PL look.
roadrunner >>
Please explain MS 70'd ??
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
The 1894 brings a substantial premium in 65 grade. It needs to be all there for me to pony up 65 money for this date.
roadrunner
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
Looking at the images I think coin #1 has more flash and a few more ticks on it. It would depend on the look desired. For me it would still be coin #2 with the PL look.
<< <i>The photos appear to be taken in much different conditions but the second coin appears to be much better. >>
Agree. Under different lighting, the first one may look better.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
100% Positive BST transactions
I like them both.
Lance.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
EAC 6024