Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Hoard of Gold (U.S.) Coins found

rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
Interesting find in the U.K. and NOT by metal detector. Cheers, RickO

null

Comments

  • Options
    kimber45ACPkimber45ACP Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If the coins are declared Treasure, they will become Crown property and will be valued. Hackney Museum wants to acquire them and the money paid would be split between the land owner and the finders. >>



    Crown property?
  • Options
    guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,308 ✭✭✭
    wow, 80 Double Eagles. Wouldn't it have been interesting if they were all 1849 and 1933's? image

    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • Options
    WTCGWTCG Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>If the coins are declared Treasure, they will become Crown property and will be valued. Hackney Museum wants to acquire them and the money paid would be split between the land owner and the finders. >>



    Crown property? >>



    Crown property as in it becomes property of the UK government.
    Follow me on Twitter @wtcgroup
    Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
  • Options
    STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    While I wouldn't consider this an archaeological find, nor worthy of "UK Treasure", the news in Great Britain is slim pickings most days, so they need to spice up stories with as much drama as possible!

    Interesting find nonetheless!
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The publication or writer is greatly exaggerating the value of the coins, saying "worth hundreds of thousands of Pounds.". In the photo they look to be in XF-AU condition. At $1400 each that's $112,000. The Pound is trading at $1.59 today, which makes the hoard worth slightly over 70,000 Pounds.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    Now all we need are images of every coin to drool over
  • Options
    WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm not much of a fan of the UK government being able to claim found hoards as they see fit--but I understand that these hoards are seen as national treasures and ultimately, in those cases where the government takes them, they *seem* to treat the finders fairly.

    This is not an archeological hoard. This is someone's relatively recent stash.
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • Options
    CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,652 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm not much of a fan of the UK government being able to claim found hoards as they see fit--but I understand that these hoards are seen as national treasures and ultimately, in those cases where the government takes them, they *seem* to treat the finders fairly.
    >>



    As I understand it, this law (last codified in 1996 if memory serves) has been quite successful in getting people to report historical finds. Now that it is generally understood that the finders are taken care of, there is less incentive to hide finds. This is a much bigger deal in the UK since they have lots more history than us - and lots of goodies still in the ground.
  • Options
    nycounselnycounsel Posts: 1,229 ✭✭
    treasure!
    image
    Dan
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The publication or writer is greatly exaggerating the value of the coins, saying "worth hundreds of thousands of Pounds.". In the photo they look to be in XF-AU condition. At $1400 each that's $112,000. The Pound is trading at $1.59 today, which makes the hoard worth slightly over 70,000 Pounds. >>

    You might very well be right. But do you know for a fact that all of the coins are common dates (as factored into your value estimate)?
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,512 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The publication or writer is greatly exaggerating the value of the coins, saying "worth hundreds of thousands of Pounds.". In the photo they look to be in XF-AU condition. At $1400 each that's $112,000. The Pound is trading at $1.59 today, which makes the hoard worth slightly over 70,000 Pounds. >>

    You might very well be right. But do you know for a fact that all of the coins are common dates (as factored into your value estimate)? >>



    This was the minimum value. Since some were dated as early as 1854, it's likely they are worth much more.



    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,512 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>This is someone's relatively recent stash. >>



    The newest coin was dated 1913 so the hoard was likely buried around the first world war.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    The great lesson is; if you find something valuable in your garden---don't tell the world, because someone is sure to take some or part of it away from you.
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>The publication or writer is greatly exaggerating the value of the coins, saying "worth hundreds of thousands of Pounds.". In the photo they look to be in XF-AU condition. At $1400 each that's $112,000. The Pound is trading at $1.59 today, which makes the hoard worth slightly over 70,000 Pounds. >>

    You might very well be right. But do you know for a fact that all of the coins are common dates (as factored into your value estimate)? >>



    This was the minimum value. Since some were dated as early as 1854, it's likely they are worth much more. >>

    That was my thought as well. But the post I responded to made it sound as if it were a given that the coins were worth roughly (only) $1400 each, on average.
  • Options
    TevaTeva Posts: 830
    Thats what I dream about everytime I go metal detecting.
    From the photo the coins look in fair shape is that common
    with buried gold??
    Give the laziest man the toughest job and he will find the easiest way to get it done.
  • Options
    speetyspeety Posts: 5,424
    Where's RYK?


    That there is some dirty gold!
    Want to buy an auction catalog for the William Hesslein Sale (December 2, 1926). Thanks to all those who have helped us obtain the others!!!

  • Options
    robkoolrobkool Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭✭✭
    WOW !!! A very kool find presumably buried around WWI. Possibly to hide them from German invaders ???
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,040 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The publication or writer is greatly exaggerating the value of the coins, saying "worth hundreds of thousands of Pounds.". In the photo they look to be in XF-AU condition. At $1400 each that's $112,000. The Pound is trading at $1.59 today, which makes the hoard worth slightly over 70,000 Pounds. >>

    You might very well be right. But do you know for a fact that all of the coins are common dates (as factored into your value estimate)? >>

    Of course not; your guess is as good as mine. Odds are that they are all common, so the number I picked seemed like a reasonable one upon which to base a more realistic guesstimate than the figure quoted in the article.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>The publication or writer is greatly exaggerating the value of the coins, saying "worth hundreds of thousands of Pounds.". In the photo they look to be in XF-AU condition. At $1400 each that's $112,000. The Pound is trading at $1.59 today, which makes the hoard worth slightly over 70,000 Pounds. >>

    You might very well be right. But do you know for a fact that all of the coins are common dates (as factored into your value estimate)? >>

    Of course not; your guess is as good as mine. Odds are that they are all common, so the number I picked seemed like a reasonable one upon which to base a more realistic guesstimate than the figure quoted in the article. >>

    I wouldn't count on it, but hope that someone actually looked at the coins/dates and based their estimate on that. Sadly, I admit, that sight-unseen, I would take your guesstimate over theirs.
  • Options
    silverpopsilverpop Posts: 6,932 ✭✭✭✭✭
    very cool find

    1946-S PCGS MS64 BOOKER T.WASHINGTON 50 CENT :)

  • Options
    <<Crown property? >>

    Crown property as in it becomes property of the UK government. >>


    It could be worse, just imagine if, as government property, each coin is stamped with the queen's broad arrow.
  • Options
    80 years in the ground? definite AT.

    image



    cool story, thanks for sharing.
    For those that don't know, I am starting pharmacy school in the fall. image
  • Options
    tmot99tmot99 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭
    But so many people are so certain that all good coins are already in slabs and that none others can exist..... This is just one find. Just imagine how many others are out there that no one knows about.
  • Options
    OnlyGoldIsMoneyOnlyGoldIsMoney Posts: 3,543 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>WOW !!! A very kool find presumably buried around WWI. Possibly to hide them from German invaders ??? >>



    Germany did not pose a credible invasion threat in WWI. The scary time for Britain - they had at least a few false alarms - was July through September 1940 after the fall of France.
  • Options
    I suspect World War 2 is around the time they may have been buried as possibly a citizen was heading off to war and did not want them seized by soldiers. Whoever buried them might have been a casualty of war and thus they have been buried for decades. I know out in Gettysburg, PA about 5 years ago that some lucky men who were metal detecting, found some gold coins buried near a big tree in a forest possibly during the civil war. People also use to bury coins outside in the ground as they did not trust banks.
    I had POSITIVE transactions with the following 31 members == Mach19 - Robkool - KollectorKing - ASUtodd - Coppercoins - Kalshacon - Whatsup - Commoncents05 - Cartwheel - Marmac - Thatoneguy - Collectorcoins - Delistamps - Bestmr - Cwazzy - Ajia - Nefprollc - Grote15 - Rampage - Grip - Rpmhunter - Chumley - 2272DavidG - Utahcoin - Cohodk - Ajbauman - Sportsmoderator1 - Sevensteps - Windycity - Pitboss - Starfish
  • Options
    I find the comments from the article interesting... "there's always a blabbermouth...'' image
  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 32,255 ✭✭✭✭✭
    them are always a good read. the american stuff thou is unreal. wtg image
  • Options
    fishcookerfishcooker Posts: 3,446 ✭✭
    Perfect example of "the government cannot tax what it cannot find."
  • Options
    jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,956 ✭✭✭✭✭
    From the picture, most of them look pretty nice.

    They were uncovered by two residents who decided to do gardening with a couple of friends. A spade hit something hard. Expecting to remove a brick or a rock, they found themselves staring at glistening gold.

    Ouch, I hope it wasn't one of the rare ones!image
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • Options
    I tend to agree with one of the comments that it was probably buried by an American in England in the mid 1930s who did not want their gold consficated by the US Govt, but didn't trust UK banks either, buried them while returning home and was never able to return to collect.

    I reckon a lot of gold was buried about that time for the same reason.
  • Options
    au58au58 Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭
    Probably buried during WWII by a Londoner or British family for safekeeping with the intent of digging them up later. Perhaps they didn't survive. During the Battle of Britain, they were on the front lines. Many did not.

    God Save the Queen.

    Please take some time to remember the US Army (especially the Infantry and Armor Divisions), the AAC, and the USMC. And remember the USN (who delivered most of them to their destiny).

    If you are looking for vacation ideas, consider the US cemeteries in Normandy and other European locations.
  • Options
    So, if your spade hit those coins would you have turned them in? I would have to think long and hard about that.
  • Options
    HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
    Chances are the crown (museums) wont be interested in them and they will be handed back to the finder and landowner to be split or sold and the proceeds split as agreed. I wouldnt be surprised to see them im an auction in about 12 months time. Nice find.
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,512 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>So, if your spade hit those coins would you have turned them in? I would have to think long and hard about that. >>



    Since they are U.S. double eagles, I would keep them. If they were ancient or medieval era coins of a historical or archaeological research interest, I would turn them in.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it were my find, nary a whisper would be heard. image Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    Why would anyone report that to the government? image
  • Options
    HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
    By UK law anything dug up made of gold or silver over 300 years old or a group of coins even copper (hoard) needs to be reported to FLO (local archiologist). If not you face a fine, confescation and a possible custodial sentance. The finders reward if the museums want to keep it is fair (independant valuations). If museums dont want to buy it, it will be returned to the finder.
  • Options
    <<By UK law anything dug up made of gold or silver over 300 years old or a group of coins even copper (hoard) needs to be reported to FLO (local archiologist). If not you face a fine, confescation and a possible custodial sentance. The finders reward if the museums want to keep it is fair (independant valuations). If museums dont want to buy it, it will be returned to the finder.>>

    Please clarify. Is that any group of coins or 300 year old coins?

  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,012 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Rumor has it that the U.K. will replace the gardener's tools which were damaged in "the dig". A couple of hoes don't cost too much.
  • Options
    HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
    Is that any group of coins or 300 year old coins?

    England, Northern Ireland, and Wales

    The Act uses the term treasure instead of treasure trove; the latter term is now confined to objects found before the Act came into force. Objects falling within the following definition are "treasure" under the Act:[39][40]

    1. If the object is not a coin,[41] it must be at least 300 years old[42] and at least 10%[43] precious metal (that is, gold or silver)[44] by weight.

    2. If the object is a coin, it must either be:
    * one of at least two coins in the same find[45] which are at least 300 years old at that time and are at least 10% precious metal by weight; or
    * one of at least ten coins in the same find which are at least 300 years old at that time.

    3. Any object at least 200 years old when found which belongs to a class of objects of outstanding historical, archaeological or cultural importance that has been designated as treasure by the Secretary of State.[46] As of 2006, the following classes of objects had been so designated:[47]

    * Any object, other than a coin, any part of which is base metal (that is, not gold or silver),[48] which when found is one of at least two base metal objects in the same find which are of prehistoric date.[49]
    * Any object, other than a coin, which is of prehistoric date, and any part of which is gold or silver.

    4. Any object which would have been treasure trove if found before 24 September 1997.

    5. Any object which, when found, is part of the same find as:
    * an object within head (1), (2), (3) or (4) above found at the same time or earlier; or
    * an object found earlier which would be within head (1), (2) or (3) above if it had been found at the same time.

    Treasure does not include unworked natural objects, or minerals extracted from a natural deposit, or objects that have been designated not to be treasure[50] by the Secretary of State.[51] Objects falling within the definition of wreck[52] are also not treasure.[39][53]

    Scotland

    The Treasure Act 1996 does not apply in Scotland.[69] Treasure trove in Scotland is dealt with under the common law of Scotland. The general rule that governs bona vacantia ("vacant goods") – that is, objects that are lost, forgotten or abandoned – is quod nullius est fit domini regis ("that which belongs to nobody becomes our Lord the King's [or Queen's]"),[70][71] and the law of treasure trove is a specialized application of that rule.[72] As in England, the Crown in Scotland has a prerogative right to treasure trove[73] for it is one of the regalia minora ("minor things of the King"),[74] that is, property rights which the Crown may exercise as it pleases and which it may alienate (transfer to another party).[75]

    To qualify as treasure trove, an object must be precious, it must be hidden, and there must be no proof of its property or reasonable presumption of its former ownership. Unlike under English common law, treasure is not restricted to only gold and silver objects.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasure_trove

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file