Home U.S. Coin Forum

Gold Coins, the PCGS price guide, bullion, green....and gold dollars

ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
Yes, gold is UP. gold has been down. Gold is up again. Gold coins SHOULD trade along the lines of bullion value, sort of.

Looking through the PCGS price guide just now, from the gold dollar to the $20.....the gold dollar shows more "green" than any of the other gold coin series.

Yet, this is the coin that has the least association with the base price of the bullion value in it (about $60 roughly). The price adjustments upward have not only been low end coins, but some of the higher priced low mintage issues as well. An interesting mix.......

Is this a sign of increasing popularity? I know Ive sure tried to pump the handle on these little gems, but I doubt anything little ME could have done would influence price trends overall. Or could it?

With a series that has a small collector base, will the addition of perhaps a few dozen more individuals cause prices to trend upwards in such a manner? Is this whats happening?

.............pretty interesting..............

Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would say the factors are - 1. They are gold, and desirable right now. 2. They are reasonably priced for many collectors. Cheers, RickO
  • mrpaseomrpaseo Posts: 4,753 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I would say the factors are - 1. They are gold, and desirable right now. 2. They are reasonably priced for many collectors. Cheers, RickO >>



    I agree with Ricko here, a few of the factors we must accept are (As Ricko said) 1. Gold is desirable... not only by collectors, but by non-collectors as well. With all the hype of owning gold many non-collectors are looking into gold, without doing the research... they see a coin that they can afford and buy in. 2. As Ricko said, collectors are looking more at gold as the price and promise if higher prices look us in the face.

    Ray

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,896 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've been collecting coins for over 50 years, and the trend I've seen with gold coins is that they tend to track the ups and downs of the gold bullion market despite that fact that numismatic premium over melt is quite high. I don't know why this is other there might be an attitude that if gold bullion is good, rarer gold coins must be good too.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • earlyAurumearlyAurum Posts: 750 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I just recently bought my first gold dollar an 1878. I paid way more than the guide indicates. If you followed the sales of gold dollars at the ANA, high quality ones went for way more than the price guide indicates (in particular I am thinking of the 1850 at Bowers and the 1865 at Heritage). I am not surprised that you see a lot of green in the PCGS price guide. In my amateur opinion, they do seem undervalued relative to other gold denominations. I like these little coins very much and will probably look to acquire a couple more to make a short type set.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,896 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you are looking for type coins, the best values so far as price paid and quality is concerned are as follows:

    CERTIFIED 1852 or 1853 for the type I, Don't by these dates raw if you don't know what you are doing because there are lots of counterfeits.

    CERTIFIED 1854 or 1855 for the type II. Look for a well struck example with a strong date. Don't buy coins with noticeable mint caused defects. I did some “tire kicking” for a Mint State Type II gold dollar as an upgrade for my set at the last summer FUN show. All the coins I saw had mint caused problems, and I would steer clear of those.

    CERTIFIED coin from the 1880s for the type III. 1889 is a good year. There are lots of nice Mint State ones around, and they are well struck. The 1873 and '74 are also common, but those dates have strike issues, especially on the word "LIBERTY" on the head ban.

    This 1889 gold dollar is only in a PCGS MS-64 green label holder, and it's knock out IMO. I've seen MS-66 graded coins I did not like as well.


    imageimage
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, gold is UP. gold has been down. Gold is up again. Gold coins SHOULD trade along the lines of bullion value, sort of.

    I've closely tracked the premiums of all denomination gold coins since around 2003. It's been clear to me that the smaller denomination gold coins act more like gold mining stocks than gold bullion. That is, they carry leverage, both ways. They far outperform bullion during frenzied moves in bullion price, and they get totally smashed during panicky flights to safety/liquidity (ie summer 2006, fall 2008, Dec 2009). Other things affect their fortunes besides just the price of gold. Generic gold in the $1's to $10's has had trouble getting any traction since November of 2009. And their performance since spring of 2006 is not all that impressive either. Until liquidity/money flows return in force like it did during Nov 2008 - Nov. 2009 (ie stimulus package 1), expect generic gold to linger at low levels even while the price of gold could go to new highs. Gold maintaining strength right now is due to the fears in fiat currencies and not liquidity being plentiful in the markets. Generic mint state slabbed gold is still generally 30-35% off the November 2009 highs while gold is 0% off it's December 2009 peak. Those premiums will shrink up on another bout of liquidity (ie stimulus package 2).

    The $1's are exceptionally scarce coins when compared to the other denominations of the generic gold market. No surprise there since any hoarding of them would have ended in the 1880's rather than 1900's as with the other larger gold denominations. Their TPG population growth is also much smaller than the other more common denominations implying most of these have been graded, esp. since they are so commonly seen in mint state. I've felt they have been extremely underrated for years but interest has yet to really pick up. But if people want gold they go to the larger denominations. Being of such a small size hurts these coins much the same as 3 cent silvers are consistently underrated. But it wouldn't take much of a promotion to boost their prices. If one is looking to buy a mint state $1 look for a nice pleasing CAC specimen as they routinely carry little to no premium ($10 or less).

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • bidaskbidask Posts: 14,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
    David Akers sold a bunch of one dollar gold coins from his personal collection at the recent ANA Heritage Platinum night.

    Probably reflects that.....David Hall was in the audience taking notes the whole evening.
    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Interesting comments. Very much along the same lines or reasoning Ive come up with. The Akers coins..perhaps that accounts for the high end price jumps, especially the very scarce 1865.

    Ive not done exact counts, but from what I am understanding, there are perhaps 20 or so issues that have surviving populations between 50 and 150 coins. Id also think that many of these are in firm hands and will not be in the marketplace anytime soon. So, while many other coins, of different series, languish for months, years...in dealer inventories, the good gold dollars tend to be hot items when they come available. The good dates, mintmarks....not of the 20 mentioned above, but ones that are far less common than the specific type coin dates that Bill mentioned...still can be located fairly reasonably. Speaking here of coins like the 1850 O 1854 S 1855 O 1856S 1864 1867 1870 1871 1872 1876

    I know Roadrunner, the size can be an issue, but that relates more to the T1 than the 2 and 3 which are only a bit smaller than a dime. Also, the slab sizes are the same for all coins, and high quality digital photography and its influence on collectors and coins plays a big part here.
  • earlyAurumearlyAurum Posts: 750 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Interesting comments. Very much along the same lines or reasoning Ive come up with. The Akers coins..perhaps that accounts for the high end price jumps, especially the very scarce 1865. >>



    Yes, the Akers coins fetched high prices. It was a good opportunity for the high end gold dollar specialist. Had it been my specialty, I would have bid strong money too. That 1865 looked like a really beauty.
  • They've been traditionally in lower demand perhaps in part because of their smaller size--the psychology of "that's so little" compared to the big, honking Morgan dollars in the $200 range or Saint Gaudens in the $2000 range. Their bullion content is low enough, on the order of $65 or so worth of gold even at today's level. And, as a series, it's got enough hard dates--Charlotte and Dahlonega mints, as well as the entire Type II group--the harder a set is to complete, the more unlikely most people are going to try for it. Indian $2.50s have the 1911-D, but once you get that one, you're home-free.

    But, all the attention gold has been getting is free publicity to this under-rated series. I suspect it'll gain more followers.
    Improperly Cleaned, Our passion for numismatics is Genuine! Now featuring correct spelling.
  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think what I really like about the series is how "individual" each year and mintmark can appear. I dont know of any other coin series that has so much difference in appearance within it.

    image
  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A fellow coin club member forwarded me a link to the current CDN greysheet, which among other numismatic news has the following to say...

    Mint State Gold Type is the exception to this week’s rule for Type. Gold Dollars, Quarter Eagles and Half Eagles all continue their hard charging ways of late, moving up in grades MS61 through MS64. Previous analysis showed there were ten coins that had advanced in Bid since January anywhere from 26% to 58%. Indeed, Type 1 Gold Dollars graded MS61 by PCGS, which went higher again this week, are now showing a 62% increase from January 1. A few higher Bids have also been recorded for select minor Gold Type encased in ANACS and ICG plastic.



    image maybe for ONCE...for ONCE...I got into a series on the way up...instead of buying at a crest and watching it all go downhill (can you say MPL?}
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    I would not underestimate the impact of forum-induced demand on the price of these rare coins.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Mike, this forum is but a very small slice of the collecting/investing community. Would not even make a ripple. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file