Eight months today and still no court ruling in the Langbord case.

SanctionII · August 16, 2010 6:24AM

On the two pending motions discussed at length before.

How many of you think that the motions will remain undecided for a year or more?

We only have to wait until 12-16-2010 for the one year anniversary of the two motions being fully briefed and submitted to the court for decision.

291fifth · August 16, 2010 6:41AM

Something must be going on behind the scenes ... but who knows what?

BillJones · August 16, 2010 7:02AM

Maybe the goverment figures it can just wait the Langbord case out until they get tired and decide to settle or give up on it.

So much for the constitutional guarantee of "a fair and speedy trial."

yellowkid · August 16, 2010 7:24AM

<< <i>Maybe the goverment figures it can just wait the Langbord case out until they get tired and decide to settle or give up on it.

So much for the constitutional guarantee of "a fair and speedy trial." >>

Billa are you suggesting that the courts are dragging their feet in this, or for that fact any, case? Perish the thought.

BigRick · August 16, 2010 8:15AM

What about THIS lawsuit?

mrearlygold · August 16, 2010 8:20AM

<< <i>What about THIS lawsuit?

>>

A lot of smart mouths think they can hide behind the keyboard. They are mistaken.

Wolf359 · August 16, 2010 8:46AM

<< <i>Maybe the goverment figures it can just wait the Langbord case out until they get tired and decide to settle or give up on it.

So much for the constitutional guarantee of "a fair and speedy trial." >>

That doesn't apply to civil courts, only criminal ones.

However, this case is a perfect example of how civil courts have grown into monstrosities that need to be culled.

DrBuster · August 16, 2010 8:47AM

This case is strung out worse than one of those meth-only-once ad campaigns.

Gov is definitely trying to grind the case out it seems, which is unfortunate. This should be a 1 year tops legal procedure to me.

CaptHenway · August 16, 2010 12:44PM

I think they are waiting for a death in the family........

ricko · August 16, 2010 11:03PM

Being unfamiliar with the workings of the legal machinery, my trusting nature says that there must be continuous dialogue behind the scenes and extensive research being performed. I hope that is true. If not, then the only alternative is chicanery. Cheers, RickO

Barry · August 17, 2010 12:37AM

Judges need to extend their work week to more than 4 hours.

Longacre · August 17, 2010 2:52AM

Try doing anything in China with the tax authorities or the regulatory authorities. I have transactions that are going on two years that are not finalized yet. And these don't even involve controversies.

Wolf359 · August 17, 2010 4:17PM

<< <i>Being unfamiliar with the workings of the legal machinery, my trusting nature says that there must be continuous dialogue behind the scenes and extensive research being performed. I hope that is true. If not, then the only alternative is chicanery. Cheers, RickO >>

Having been through a divorce that took several years to complete I tell you the hold-up is that at least one party is not willing to work things out. Otherwise, the most impossible problems could be resolved in a few hours if not minutes. When you have such a situation, dirty pool is going on. There is no "research" or dialog, that's just naive.

Edited for a typo.

Eight months today and still no court ruling in the Langbord case.

Comments

Leave a Comment