Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Gold CAC sticker on Oregon Trail Commem, do you agree?

SouthcountySouthcounty Posts: 707 ✭✭✭✭✭
Do you agree with this gold CAC sticker and what would your grade be?
image
image
image

Comments

  • Options
    ArtistArtist Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭
    No, I do not agree.

    Based on the photos, that coin should have two gold stickers...

    image
  • Options
    thisnamztakenthisnamztaken Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, I agree. It's under graded. Judging by the photos, a 65!
    I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
    - Jim
  • Options
    What a strike,
  • Options

    MS65.

    I've got about a dozen green label 63 Morgans that look 64+ to me but yours could go 65+!
  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 33,173 ✭✭✭✭✭
    nice commemorative for sure. id go a 65 on it and no im not a fan of any cac stickers. to each our own
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,593 ✭✭✭✭✭
    From the pics, it appears to be undergraded, but I didn't need some sticker to tell me that.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,155 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Do you agree with this gold CAC sticker and what would your grade be? >>

    Yes, I agree absolutely.

    I'd have gone 64 PQ or 65 on that, personally.



    << <i>From the pics, it appears to be undergraded, but I didn't need some sticker to tell me that. >>


    I'll agree absolutely with PerryHall, as well. image

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That is a gorgeous OTC, and, based on the photographs, I believe it should grade at least 64. In hand, possibly 65. Here we have two conflicting opinions (TPG + FPG), which is why, without REAL standards, coin grading remains contentious. Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    AngryTurtleAngryTurtle Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭
    Great Strike, very few if any marks, cant tell the luster from the pics. If the luster is there then absolutely agree.
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,097 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Agree with the need to bridge gaps between grading companies due to poor assessment of some coins. Disagree with the placement of the sticker on the obverse of the holder. MS 64 coin.

    TDN, kudos to you and company. Tell Laura I still miss her 'zeal" and sharing her knowledge here.
  • Options
    mommam17mommam17 Posts: 971 ✭✭✭
    The gold sticker is a warning to the owner of the coin not to sell it for the grade on holder. CAC feels it's at least a 64, possibly higher, and would tell owner what they thought it should grade. You might know it grades higher, but the owner might not.
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,645 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>That is a gorgeous OTC, and, based on the photographs, I believe it should grade at least 64. In hand, possibly 65. Here we have two conflicting opinions (TPG + FPG), which is why, without REAL standards, coin grading remains contentious. Cheers, RickO >>



    What "real" standards would you apply to 1,000 different Morgans, all of which are the same grade but none of which are alike?
    theknowitalltroll;
  • Options
    orevilleoreville Posts: 12,316 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Southcountry:

    That label is supposed to be a green color, with the blue color ones of that design being very rare.

    Is it green or is it blue?

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • Options
    orevilleoreville Posts: 12,316 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>From the pics, it appears to be undergraded, but I didn't need some sticker to tell me that. >>



    Where do you draw the line on making that statement? I think the consumer needs that sticker to protect himself or herself when he/she needs to sell that slab. What if the owner is the widow of a coin collector with three small children?

    Keep in mind that it also appears to be dated 1938 but "I didn't need some label to tell me that." image
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,593 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>From the pics, it appears to be undergraded, but I didn't need some sticker to tell me that. >>



    Where do you draw the line on making that statement? I think the consumer needs that sticker to protect himself or herself when he/she needs to sell that slab. What if the owner is the widow of a coin collector with three small children?

    Keep in mind that it also appears to be dated 1938 but "I didn't need some label to tell me that." image >>



    You are making two assumptions---the widow knows what the gold sticker means and that the buyer agrees with CAC. Also, I'm glad for you that you didn't need the label to tell you the date on the coin yet you didn't trust the grade on this same label.




    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    orevilleoreville Posts: 12,316 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PerryHall:

    Isn't it nice we can disagree, still be friends, friendly and be civil (well at least on the surface image).

    Of course we can wage our own private war by pm (but not until after my busy season ends 4/15).
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • Options
    richardshipprichardshipp Posts: 5,647 ✭✭✭
    That is at least a 65 imo.
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>From the pics, it appears to be undergraded, but I didn't need some sticker to tell me that. >>



    Where do you draw the line on making that statement? I think the consumer needs that sticker to protect himself or herself when he/she needs to sell that slab. What if the owner is the widow of a coin collector with three small children?

    Keep in mind that it also appears to be dated 1938 but "I didn't need some label to tell me that." image >>



    You are making two assumptions---the widow knows what the gold sticker means and that the buyer agrees with CAC. Also, I'm glad for you that you didn't need the label to tell you the date on the coin yet you didn't trust the grade on this same label. >>

    You seem to be ignoring the fact that CAC will make an offer commensurate with a higher grade, based on it being under-graded in their opinion. Thinking or knowing that you have an under-graded coin is only part of the battle - you need to find a buyer who will agree and pay accordingly.image
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,593 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>PerryHall:

    Isn't it nice we can disagree, still be friends, friendly and be civil (well at least on the surface image).

    Of course we can wage our own private war by pm (but not until after my busy season ends 4/15). >>



    oreville---You're all right in my book and I value our friendship but sometimes we will see things differently all though we usually agree 99% of the time.



    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
    To me, it looks like an average, boring Oregon commem. However, an MS-63 grade is usually commensurate with a real dog (below average), so the fact that the coin is graded 64 (or higher) by the CAC is not exactly shocking.

    Of course, all opinions are worth little without seeing the coin in hand.
  • Options
    SouthcountySouthcounty Posts: 707 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Southcountry:

    That label is supposed to be a green color, with the blue color ones of that design being very rare.

    Is it green or is it blue? >>



    This is the old green holder slab. I have glare spots over the label from my lights which are great for when you crop the coin down, but not exactly what I would do for a nice full slab shot.

    This is the only CAC coin that I own, and I am on the fence with the CAC issue. I actually purchased this coin for the gold CAC sticker as I wanted to have an in hand example of a coin that got a gold CAC sticker for my own reference. Well that and I loved the coin, one of my all time favorite designs.
  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,150 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PCGS was probably looking at the reverse rim, right around the 3:00 spot and seeing the slide marks downgraded the coin to MS63.

    Pretty coin and a joy to behold.
  • Options


    << <i>To me, it looks like an average, boring Oregon commem. >>

    image I can hardly believe you think this design is boring! The obverse on a Boone... now that's boring.
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>To me, it looks like an average, boring Oregon commem. >>

    image I can hardly believe you think this design is boring! The obverse on a Boone... now that's boring. >>



    I have nothing against the design. In fact, I like it. I meant that it was an interesting example of the issue, not boring in the absolute sense.
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,867 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It appears that the coin is at least an MS-64. If it has been dipped, that might explain why it might not get an MS-65.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options


    << <i>Yes, I agree. It's under graded. Judging by the photos, a 65! >>



    image
    "If you hit a midget on the head with a stick, he turns into 40 gold coins." - Patty Oswalt
  • Options
    Looks like a 65 to me image
  • Options
    mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    The CAC sticker says that they did not find any flaws, flaws that we would not see from pictures. CAC finds things like PVC residue, and tiny imperfections, so they will not give the sticker. On this coin with the gold sticker, I have no problem calling the grade MS64, but I cannot call it MS65 just by looking at pictures.

    The Oregon Trail is one of my favorite designs. Almost forgot to say that I would not be surprised to see gold stickers on lower grade Oregon Trails, rather than on higher grade ones. I have only two gold sticker Oregon Trails, both only PCGS 64s.
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • Options
    robkoolrobkool Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS65... With a "green" CAC sticker.
  • Options
    CAC gives the green bean to so many coins that would likely upgrade. When they finally give out a gold, you can be sure that that coin is damn nice for the grade.
  • Options
    ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    Clearly an undergraded coin. It's looks to be an easy 65.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Options
    Yes a 64 easy
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's the question: which would bring more in the marketplace, the 63 with a gold sticker or the same coin in a 65 holder? Clearly, the novelty of the gold sticker has some cachet.
  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm with ya... who can I bribe to get all my coins reholdered two grades lower, so they can ALL get the gold bean?

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,593 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Here's the question: which would bring more in the marketplace, the 63 with a gold sticker or the same coin in a 65 holder? Clearly, the novelty of the gold sticker has some cachet. >>



    I'd take the 65 holder if the coin looked like it was properly graded.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    Hi All,

    its nice these little labels and stickers. So cute. I think the coin is undergraded at 63 from the images as shown. I'd not jump to 65 so fast tho. It would be neat to qantify the effect these tags have on buyers impulses and...frame of mind (generally speaking - not this coin etc. etc.).

    Best,
    Eric
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,645 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Hi All,

    its nice these little labels and stickers. So cute. I think the coin is undergraded at 63 from the images as shown. I'd not jump to 65 so fast tho. It would be neat to qantify the effect these tags have on buyers impulses and...frame of mind.

    Best,
    Eric >>



    I thought the gold sticker implied a 2 point bump in grade.
    theknowitalltroll;
  • Options
    <<I thought the gold sticker implied a 2 point bump in grade.>>

    Hi there,

    implied...that makes me nervous that term in relation to collectibles. The little sticker can imply what it wants but I can't jump to 65 from what is shown. More luster would be nice but we are grading from pictures here. I read that interview with John Albanese - that the CAC stickers represented the "A" (gold) and "B" (green) coins in a given grade, leaving the "C" coins as those "weaker for the grade" or however it was worded, "unstickered". Maybe I am getting old. image or maybe the rules changed again. I dunno as I don't follow them image

    Best,
    Eric
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>...I thought the gold sticker implied a 2 point bump in grade. >>

    No, the gold sticker simply means that CAC believes the coin is under-graded.
  • Options
    lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭✭✭
    not much of a price difference from 63 to 64
    LCoopie = Les
  • Options
    ebaytraderebaytrader Posts: 3,312 ✭✭✭
    The only thing potentially holding that coin back is luster and we'll never know that from the pictures.
  • Options
    mommam17mommam17 Posts: 971 ✭✭✭
    I think the luster is holding it back from being a gem/65 coin. Years ago had a 1938 PDS set that all graded MS 64 because of lack of luster.
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,593 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The only thing potentially holding that coin back is luster and we'll never know that from the pictures. >>



    Agree. Dull luster and hairlines may not be evident in the pic but they can certainly hold a coin back from a higher grade.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    AhrensdadAhrensdad Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭
    Looks like a lock 65. Maybe shot 66. Nice coin.
    Successful BST Transactions with: WTCG, Ikenefic, Twincam, InternetJunky, bestday, 1twobits, Geoman x4, Blackhawk, Robb, nederveit, mesquite, sinin1, CommemDude, Gerard, sebrown, Guitarwes, Commoncents05, tychojoe, adriana, SeaEagleCoins, ndgoflo, stone, vikingdude, golfer72, kameo, Scotty1418, Tdec1000, Sportsmoderator1 and many others.


    Please visit my website Millcitynumismatics.com
  • Options
    seateddimeseateddime Posts: 6,180 ✭✭✭
    I just got a PCGS64 on a 1944 Half I thought was a 66 (and paid 66 money for). Makes me feel a little better to see I am not the only one.
    I seldom check PM's but do check emails often jason@seated.org

    Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.

    Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file