Home Sports Talk
Options

The Mets . . . . .

ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭
Really suck! image

Try a little harder tommorrow, OK?

Sincerely,

RSN

Comments

  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭✭
    We hate Boston almost as much as the Yanks, but not as much as the Sillies! image


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
    Sorry to disappoint. Hopefully we will do better tomorrow.

    At least the Phillies lost for the 10th time out of 12 games.
  • Options
    stevekstevek Posts: 27,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Sorry to disappoint. Hopefully we will do better tomorrow.

    At least the Phillies lost for the 10th time out of 12 games. >>



    Yes, but considering that is correct, and considering the Phillies are still in first place, that must mean that the teams behind the Phillies must really stink. 1/2 of a Ha!
  • Options
    lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Sorry to disappoint. Hopefully we will do better tomorrow.

    At least the Phillies lost for the 10th time out of 12 games. >>



    Yes, but considering that is correct, and considering the Phillies are still in first place, that must mean that the teams behind the Phillies must really stink. 1/2 of a Ha! >>



    I really can't argue with that. The Mets are way too inconsistent and are having way too many errors. They had 3 in one inning tonight! You don't win too many games like that
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>We hate Boston almost as much as the Yanks, but not as much as the Sillies! image >>



    Hate? Hate? Does that mean Ray Knight stopped sending Christmas cards to Calvin Schialdi?
  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭✭
    We hate Boston almost as much as the Yanks, but not as much as the Sillies! >>



    Hate? Hate? Does that mean Ray Knight stopped sending Christmas cards to Calvin Schialdi?


    No, he just sends them to Bob Stanley instead, LOL!!


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    stevekstevek Posts: 27,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Go Yankees. LOL
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭
    One hit!! Jeez, that's not really trying!! image
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Come on Mets -- every other team lit up Wang image

    Now they have to deal with Hughes.
  • Options
    stevekstevek Posts: 27,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Let's Go Yanks
  • Options
    jradke4jradke4 Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭
    lost 10-6!!
    Packers Fan for Life
    Collecting:
    Brett Favre Master Set
    Favre Ticket Stubs
    Favre TD Reciever Autos
    Football HOF Player/etc. Auto Set
    Football HOF Rc's
  • Options
    jradke4jradke4 Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭
    lost 6-3.
    Packers Fan for Life
    Collecting:
    Brett Favre Master Set
    Favre Ticket Stubs
    Favre TD Reciever Autos
    Football HOF Player/etc. Auto Set
    Football HOF Rc's
  • Options
    jradke4jradke4 Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭
    well at least they didnt get swept by the crew...however they did strike out 12 times in what 7 inning to YG!!!
    Packers Fan for Life
    Collecting:
    Brett Favre Master Set
    Favre Ticket Stubs
    Favre TD Reciever Autos
    Football HOF Player/etc. Auto Set
    Football HOF Rc's
  • Options
    grote15grote15 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Brett favre sucks..


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Options
    lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Brett favre sucks.. >>



    image
  • Options
    stevekstevek Posts: 27,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    .....still behind the Phillies and still in third place. Ha!
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭
    . . . . . . . still suck . . . . . .
  • Options
    WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Now we know how Red Sox fans felt for 80 years.........



    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Options
    swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    Oliver Perez is back !!

    image


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And the suckage continues --- ESPN probably wishes they could change the game they are broadcasting tonight.
  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,460 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Now we know how Red Sox fans felt for 80 years.........



    Steve >>



    at least the Sox fielded some teams that could score more than a run or two a game
  • Options
    WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    at least the Sox fielded some teams that could score more than a run or two a game



    So have the Mets.

    I would hope that the Sox over an 80 year period fielded some teams that scored more then a run or two per game.

    The fact remains that they sucked for almost 80 years.


    Cmon you can do better then that.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Options
    WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Oliver Perez is back !!




    Swartz! I see you finally came out from under your bed. Where were you when the Sillies

    were losing game after game and were only .5 ahead?


    Bandwagon fan are ya?


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sox didn't suck in 67 and they were really fun to watch when they were hitting tons of homers in the late 70s. And who could forget 75? So they sucked for most of those 80 years, that much is true.
  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Sox didn't suck in 67 and they were really fun to watch when they were hitting tons of homers in the late 70s. And who could forget 75? So they sucked for most of those 80 years, that much is true. >>



    Agreed, except I would not say they necessarily "sucked" for most of the 80 years -- they were consistently competitve in the 80s, 90s, and thru 2003 as well. And they had great, memorable players over the years such as Williams, Yaz, Fisk, Tiant, Rice, Lynn, Boggs, Pre-Roid Clemens, Pedro in his Prime, etc. No World Series for 80 years did not mean bottom dweller for 80 years (like the Cubs).

    Bill Simmons on espn.com goes through this in exhaustive detail if you need more proof, WinPitcher.
Sign In or Register to comment.