The Mets . . . . .

Connecticoin · June 26, 2009 11:41AM

Really suck!

Try a little harder tommorrow, OK?

Sincerely,

RSN

grote15 · June 26, 2009 12:15PM

We hate Boston almost as much as the Yanks, but not as much as the Sillies!

lawnmowerman · June 26, 2009 12:21PM

Sorry to disappoint. Hopefully we will do better tomorrow.

At least the Phillies lost for the 10th time out of 12 games.

stevek · June 26, 2009 1:33PM

<< Sorry to disappoint. Hopefully we will do better tomorrow.

At least the Phillies lost for the 10th time out of 12 games. >>

Yes, but considering that is correct, and considering the Phillies are still in first place, that must mean that the teams behind the Phillies must really stink. 1/2 of a Ha!

lawnmowerman · June 26, 2009 1:59PM

<< 

<< Sorry to disappoint. Hopefully we will do better tomorrow.

At least the Phillies lost for the 10th time out of 12 games. >>

Yes, but considering that is correct, and considering the Phillies are still in first place, that must mean that the teams behind the Phillies must really stink. 1/2 of a Ha! >>

I really can't argue with that. The Mets are way too inconsistent and are having way too many errors. They had 3 in one inning tonight! You don't win too many games like that

Connecticoin · June 26, 2009 6:57PM

<< We hate Boston almost as much as the Yanks, but not as much as the Sillies!

>>

Hate? Hate? Does that mean Ray Knight stopped sending Christmas cards to Calvin Schialdi?

grote15 · June 27, 2009 3:36AM

We hate Boston almost as much as the Yanks, but not as much as the Sillies! >>

Hate? Hate? Does that mean Ray Knight stopped sending Christmas cards to Calvin Schialdi?

No, he just sends them to Bob Stanley instead, LOL!!

stevek · June 27, 2009 6:10AM

Go Yankees. LOL

Connecticoin · June 27, 2009 9:40PM

One hit!! Jeez, that's not really trying!!

Connecticoin · June 28, 2009 11:27AM

Come on Mets -- every other team lit up Wang

Now they have to deal with Hughes.

stevek · June 28, 2009 11:29AM

Let's Go Yanks

jradke4 · June 29, 2009 11:44AM

lost 10-6!!

jradke4 · June 30, 2009 11:26PM

lost 6-3.

jradke4 · July 2, 2009 5:38AM

well at least they didnt get swept by the crew...however they did strike out 12 times in what 7 inning to YG!!!

grote15 · July 2, 2009 6:32AM

Brett favre sucks..

lawnmowerman · July 2, 2009 7:19AM

just beat the pirates

Connecticoin · July 2, 2009 10:37AM

<< Brett favre sucks.. >>

stevek · July 2, 2009 3:02PM

.....still behind the Phillies and still in third place. Ha!

Connecticoin · July 5, 2009 10:47PM

. . . . . . . still suck . . . . . .

WinPitcher · July 5, 2009 10:50PM

Now we know how Red Sox fans felt for 80 years.........

Steve

swartz1 · July 7, 2009 12:10AM

Oliver Perez is back !!

Connecticoin · July 7, 2009 9:20PM

And the suckage continues --- ESPN probably wishes they could change the game they are broadcasting tonight.

Barndog · July 7, 2009 9:25PM

<< Now we know how Red Sox fans felt for 80 years.........

Steve >>

at least the Sox fielded some teams that could score more than a run or two a game

WinPitcher · July 7, 2009 10:15PM

at least the Sox fielded some teams that could score more than a run or two a game

So have the Mets.

I would hope that the Sox over an 80 year period fielded some teams that scored more then a run or two per game.

The fact remains that they sucked for almost 80 years.

Cmon you can do better then that.

Steve

WinPitcher · July 7, 2009 10:17PM

Oliver Perez is back !!

Swartz! I see you finally came out from under your bed. Where were you when the Sillies

were losing game after game and were only .5 ahead?

Bandwagon fan are ya?

Steve

Barndog · July 7, 2009 11:52PM

Sox didn't suck in 67 and they were really fun to watch when they were hitting tons of homers in the late 70s. And who could forget 75? So they sucked for most of those 80 years, that much is true.

Connecticoin · July 8, 2009 12:38AM

<< Sox didn't suck in 67 and they were really fun to watch when they were hitting tons of homers in the late 70s. And who could forget 75? So they sucked for most of those 80 years, that much is true. >>

Agreed, except I would not say they necessarily "sucked" for most of the 80 years -- they were consistently competitve in the 80s, 90s, and thru 2003 as well. And they had great, memorable players over the years such as Williams, Yaz, Fisk, Tiant, Rice, Lynn, Boggs, Pre-Roid Clemens, Pedro in his Prime, etc. No World Series for 80 years did not mean bottom dweller for 80 years (like the Cubs).

Bill Simmons on espn.com goes through this in exhaustive detail if you need more proof, WinPitcher.

The Mets . . . . .

Comments