I would bet that this coin gets bagged at NGC and PCGS 99 times out of 100 and I would agree with their decision, too, if i am interpreting the images correctly.
This is a wonderfully NT coin inside and out. Whether or not there is toning on the edge really doesn't swing me one way or the other and IMO doesn't swing the TPGs either in my experience. Interestingly I've seen coins with barely any toning on the faces, but the edge was loaded with toning.
A lie told often enough becomes the truth. ~Vladimir Lenin
<< <i>This is the notorious "crackled toning" that PCGS used to grade early on but has since dismissed as AT circa 1991-92. It will not grade at PCGS or NGC
Wow, that one really is a tougher call........the color progression would be unusually well-done for an AT coin.........yet I agree that it doesn't make much sense to sell it raw at a fraction of what it would cost in a good slab.
This one has always been my favorite Texas (from Polaris archives)....some similar colors to the coin in question.
<< <i>Wow, that one really is a tougher call........the color progression would be unusually well-done for an AT coin.........yet I agree that it doesn't make much sense to sell it raw at a fraction of what it would cost in a good slab.
This one has always been my favorite Texas (from Polaris archives)....some similar colors to the coin in question. >>
If you look closely, it has a similar color progression, but not nearly as complete. Again, I'm not saying that the OP coin is NT....just saying that it would be more of a challenge to get that look using AT methods.
<< <i>If you look closely, it has a similar color progression, but not nearly as complete. Again, I'm not saying that the OP coin is NT....just saying that it would be more of a challenge to get that look using AT methods. >>
I think the color progression is completely different, yours has that complete "hard" look where the other one does not. And I agree with JCM that a coin with that much color would no doubt be in a slab by now. Of course JMHO...
john
Edited to say, I remember buying an Oregon in the 1980 FUN sale that was toned that way way before TPG's and had someone explain to me after I bought it that it was AT. Really ticked me off too, I thought the coin was so cool, but I think I learned a little from that experience.
<< <i>This is the notorious "crackled toning" that PCGS used to grade early on but has since dismissed as AT circa 1991-92. It will not grade at PCGS or NGC
TRUTH >>
But used to grade with SEGS. >>
I totally agree this is the "crackled Toning". If you have never seen it in person it's like a crackled coating not toning. They look neat but are in no way NT.
On the side with Liberty, it appears to me that a liquid was applied and then wiped off- it looks like it settled into the deeper recesses of the design. Also the colors seem to be in sharply demarcated bands, not in a mellow gradation like the PCGS example.
Comments
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>AT imho. I'm very suspicious of the colorful toned edge. The toners I have all have dark/black toned edge areas. >>
I disagree with this statement, I have a few toners that were pulled from double mint sets with neon toning on the rims too. So it can happen
<< <i>Wrap a top tier slab around that thing and it sells for 3x-4x the current asking price IMO. >>
Which is why it's almost certainly AT. The seller is obviously not a newbie.
For a large selection of U.S. Coins & Currency, visit The Reeded Edge's online webstore at the link below.
The Reeded Edge
-Paul
TRUTH
<< <i>This is the notorious "crackled toning" that PCGS used to grade early on but has since dismissed as AT circa 1991-92. It will not grade at PCGS or NGC
TRUTH >>
But used to grade with SEGS.
AT all day long.
Regards, Steve K.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
World Collection
British Collection
German States Collection
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
This one has always been my favorite Texas (from Polaris archives)....some similar colors to the coin in question.
<< <i>Wow, that one really is a tougher call........the color progression would be unusually well-done for an AT coin.........yet I agree that it doesn't make much sense to sell it raw at a fraction of what it would cost in a good slab.
This one has always been my favorite Texas (from Polaris archives)....some similar colors to the coin in question.
Now THAT'S a keeper!
Just my two-cent piece.
Again, I'm not saying that the OP coin is NT....just saying that it would be more of a challenge to get that look using AT methods.
<< <i>If you look closely, it has a similar color progression, but not nearly as complete.
Again, I'm not saying that the OP coin is NT....just saying that it would be more of a challenge to get that look using AT methods. >>
I think the color progression is completely different, yours has that complete "hard" look where the other one does not. And I agree with JCM that a coin with that much color would no doubt be in a slab by now. Of course JMHO...
john
Edited to say, I remember buying an Oregon in the 1980 FUN sale that was toned that way way before TPG's and had someone explain to me after I bought it that it was AT. Really ticked me off too, I thought the coin was so cool, but I think I learned a little from that experience.
<< <i>
<< <i>This is the notorious "crackled toning" that PCGS used to grade early on but has since dismissed as AT circa 1991-92. It will not grade at PCGS or NGC
TRUTH >>
But used to grade with SEGS. >>
I totally agree this is the "crackled Toning". If you have never seen it in person it's like a crackled coating not toning. They look neat but are in no way NT.
PS: it is AT
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
K
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
TRUTH