Poll Part II: Which of these two expensive but available coins would you rather have?
These are the two coins, from Scotsman auctions, which inspired the earlier question. Assume that they are close in value. Which of these two expensive but available coins would you rather have for your collection? Does this illustration alter your opinion from the other poll?
(Note that Coin A is better imaged the Coin B. Coin B looks more natural, lustrous, etc. in hand.)
Coin A: 1793 "AMERICA" (S-3, R-3-). ANACS XF-40 details, reengraved-burnished.


Coin B: 1907 High Relief Flat Rim. PCGS MS-62.

(Note that Coin A is better imaged the Coin B. Coin B looks more natural, lustrous, etc. in hand.)
Coin A: 1793 "AMERICA" (S-3, R-3-). ANACS XF-40 details, reengraved-burnished.


Coin B: 1907 High Relief Flat Rim. PCGS MS-62.

0
Comments
<< <i>I don't suppose a problem-free Chain cent in F-15 to VF-20 would be a third option?
I do not think that you can buy a problem-free Chain in VF-20 for the same price as the HR in this thread. In fact, I expect this Chain to sell for a higher price than the HR Saint.
But on the other hand, the Chain Cent doesn't seem to have any corrosion either, which would be my largest stopped when acquiring one.
I'd still probably settle with the Chain Cent, despite the "Problem"
Yes, I understand that the lure of a huge gold coin has far broader appeal, especially to people who know nothing about coins, and I may be "overthinking the room" here, but for me a high-end and original Chain cent is sexier.
Edited: Oops. I didn't realize that the chain cent was re-engraved.
merse
<< <i>Tough decision. The HR Saint looks like a 63 or 64, not a 62.
But on the other hand, the Chain Cent doesn't seem to have any corrosion either, which would be my largest stopped when acquiring one.
I'd still probably settle with the Chain Cent, despite the "Problem" >>
The "burnishing" does not bother me. I would take that over corrosion or significant porosity. I cannot look at the Chain without seeing the re-engraving of the hair, and that would be a deal-killer for me.
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Where did that hands down phrase come from anyway?
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
Tough choice, but I went with A. Older IS better...
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
<< <i>I am not much into "problem" coins - at least obvious ones such as re-engraving >>
<< <i>Tough choice, but I went with A. Older IS better... >>
Tough choice, but I went with B. Golder IS better...
Very cool
i do not mind the fact it has a few problems because my
eye does not immediately go to the problems. i would wager most
people on this forum could only guess where the problem areas are located.
the saint while pretty does nothing for me. i feel the design is over rated...
as in it is not the "finest or best" design to ever come from the mint. it is up
there but not the best.
<< <i>Re-engraving is death. B. >>
No, counterfeit is death. Re-engraving is having your eye poked out.
<< <i>In this case the saint hands down.
Where did that hands down phrase come from anyway? >>
The hands-down origin is from horse racing. A hands-down victory is one that is so assured that a jockey can drop his hands and relax his grip on the reins as he approaches the line.
Instagram - numismatistkenny
My Numismatics with Kenny Blog Page Best viewed on a laptop or monitor.
ANA Life Member & Volunteer District Representative
2019 ANA Young Numismatist of the Year
Doing my best to introduce Young Numismatists and Young Adults into the hobby.
It has true meaning to this country. I don't like the re-engraving, but still better than a gold saint.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
If you refuse to accept that option, then B. I'd just turnaround and sell it and wait for a better chain with the proceeds
<< <i>
<< <i>Re-engraving is death. B. >>
No, counterfeit is death. Re-engraving is having your eye poked out.
I thought tooling was having your eyes poked out. Maybe you're thinking of graffitiing?
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>I'd go for the re-engraved Chain Cent. It would look good in an album, and even better in an overseas auction.
Ha!
<< <i>
<< <i>Tough choice, but I went with A. Older IS better... >>
Tough choice, but I went with B. Golder IS better...
Nice comeback!
<< <i>i said chain. older is better in this case.
i do not mind the fact it has a few problems because my
eye does not immediately go to the problems. i would wager most
people on this forum could only guess where the problem areas are located.
the saint while pretty does nothing for me. i feel the design is over rated...
as in it is not the "finest or best" design to ever come from the mint. it is up
there but not the best. >>
I've never been that enamored of Saints, preferring the design of the $10
Indian. One problem with the SG $20 is that the ones I can afford tend to be pretty
baggy. Also, the design almost looks more like a medal than a coin to me.
(putting on flame suit...)
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
What about this PCGS-MS65 Chain Cent from a Stacks auction,
Versus this PCGS-MS69 High Relief from a recent Heritage auction
Now which do you prefer? I pick the chain cent.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870