Should coins be overgraded by TPG's as a professional courtesy?

I know of one dealer who gets very miffed when his borderline coins don't make "his" grade. He feels that the TPGs should upgrade such coins as a professional courtesy. He apparently feels that this is just something that any business should do for another business.
Comment...
Comment...
All glory is fleeting.
0
Comments
Does it happen? Absolutely YES.
Should it happen? Absolutely NO.
However, with that said, I am sure he has the same view as most collectors that the TPGs give gifts to the big players all the time. True or not, this perception is very real.
not only ask me what grades I want but supply an easy-to-use-form for said purpose.
<< <i>He apparently feels that this is just something that any business should do for another business. >>
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I believe your friend is making the false assumption that the TPGs need his business.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Does it happen? Absolutely YES. >>
Sounds like you're questioning the integrity of NGC & PCGS. Let's see the evidence.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Funny question, though.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
-----------------------------
Edit for typo.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Perhaps there are some services who'd appreciate a box of Godiva Chocolates for a higher grade? But those wouldn't be accepted on feeBay....
not very ethical.
<< <i>
<< <i>Does it happen? Absolutely YES. >>
Sounds like you're questioning the integrity of NGC & PCGS. Let's see the evidence. >>
I question the capabilities of TPGs to be consistent with their grades and their ability to be completely impartial, yes. Face it, it's in the nature of people to be at least a little biased. The only one that I am aware of that has done something to dispel the appearance of impropriety is ICG (who grades coins without having any idea of who submitted them, making it a lot more difficult to show partiality and favortism).
You want evidence you can SEE? I have no documented chain of physical evidence to provide you. You want evidence you can HEAR (read)? I only have personal accounts, the accounts of several coin collector friends, and quite a few stories from smaller and medium-sized dealers who have submitted and resubmitted coins and continued to get obviously low (and incorrect) grades, only to have them resubmitted by a larger and more well-known dealer and come back 2-3 grades higher (in one case a coin went from an F12 to a VF25, something that even a novice coin collector should be able to distinguish). I also have in my possession a coin that was BBed twice and then resubmitted by another large dealer and came back in a VF35 holder with no mention of the blatant and obvious cleaning/dipping that had occurred. The coin is UNNATURALLY shiny (not lustrous) with hairlines ALL OVER IT. I think the kicker was when the dealer who resubmitted it said, "Let ME submit it. I can get it slabbed." Sure enough, he was right. If you talk to enough dealers on a bourse floor about it in casual conversation, you will find that there is a definite undercurrent of suspicion among quite a few of them. So it's not just me.
Coincidence? Unlikely, but perhaps. In my opinion, it's more likely that certain dealers and high-volume submitters get "favors" and the benefit of the doubt on better grades.
So the only question that's relevant to ME is: if the TPGs can't be consistent (for WHATEVER reason) with their grades on a particular example of a coin, how can I possibly trust that their grading is accurate or impartial? Answer: I can't. Which is why I could care less what type of plastic (if any) a coin resides in. I buy the coin, not the plastic... which means, the plastic is of little value to me except in determining whether or not a specimen is GENUINE (and in those cases where I have ANY doubts, I would go with PCGS, NGC, or ANACS).
<< <i>Should coins be overgraded by TPG's as a professional courtesy? >>
Unfortunately I know of several dealers who make a habit of complaining incessantly about their grading results. "Crybaby" is the proper nickname for these folks.
Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
<< <i>I know of one dealer who gets very miffed when his borderline coins don't make "his" grade. He feels that the TPGs should upgrade such coins as a professional courtesy. He apparently feels that this is just something that any business should do for another business.
Comment... >>
Apparantly, he should give up grading since he doesn't seem to be very good at it.
He apparently hasn't heard of NGc!
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
<< <i>He apparently feels that this is just something that any business should do for another business.
He apparently hasn't heard of NGc!
Leo >>
Are you saying NGC gives out courtesy grades?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
next question please...
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>
<< <i>Does it happen? Absolutely YES. >>
Sounds like you're questioning the integrity of NGC & PCGS. Let's see the evidence. >>
Put up or shut up.
i'm not sure but i think i just heard a poof pistol lock and load..
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
<< <i>I know of one dealer who gets very miffed when his borderline coins don't make "his" grade. He feels that the TPGs should upgrade such coins as a professional courtesy. He apparently feels that this is just something that any business should do for another business.
Comment... >>
Comment? Yea! The dealer you mentioned is a dumbass!
Sounds like you're questioning the integrity of NGC & PCGS. Let's see the evidence. >>
"Put up or shut up."
Well, the post above does not mention any TPG by name, and therefore isn't questioning the integrity of NGC or PCGS. I can't speak for the OP, but no specific TPG was implicated in his post.
Will’sProoflikes
<< <i>I know of one dealer who gets very miffed when his borderline coins don't make "his" grade. He feels that the TPGs should upgrade such coins as a professional courtesy. >>
he's right
K S
<< <i>Comment... >>
The dealer you know is retarded. Literally has mental issues. If one simply thinks (or perhaps acknowledges) that "professional courtesy" happens that's one thing. But for some joe blow to assume that a major TPG should change their standards just so he can turn the screws on some customers is beyond ludicrous.
Another Class I 1804 dollar, a PCGS Proof-67 once owned by the King of Siam (now Thailand), sold as part of the King of Siam 11-coin set for $1.82 million in 1993, for more than $4 million in 2001, and most recently for $8.5 million in 2005 to Rare Coin Wholesalers. The same coin had previously been graded Proof-65 by both PCGS and Q. David Bowers.
The PCGS Proof-64 Dexter specimen, another Class I dollar, sold for $1.84 million at Stack's 65th anniversary auction in 2000. The same coin had previously been graded Proof-63 by Q. David Bowers.
The Adams-Carter specimen, graded Proof-58 by PCGS, sold in August 2003 for $1.2 million through Bowers and Merena. The same coin sold just two years earlier for $874,000. Reportedly, during the time the Carter family owned the coin, from 1950 to 1984, Amon Carter Jr. occasionally carried it unprotected in his pocket, which caused the wear.
The Adams-Carter coin is currently graded Proof-58 by PCGS, but in the past it was graded Proof-50 by NGC and before that Proof-45 by PCGS. To PCGS's own graders, the coin improved an astonishing 13 points in quality over time. PCGS contended that it graded the coin as it most recently did because previous graders didn't account for its weak strike. But Q. David Bowers, Walter Breen, and Eric P. Newman and Kenneth E. Bressett had all graded it extremely fine as well. A considerably more likely explanation is that this coin is just another example of how the grading "standards" of the grading services are anything but consistent over time and how they treat rare coins or coins with provenance more leniently than other coins.
NGC recently engaged in a similar act of blatant overgrading. It graded the Berg-Garrett specimen, a Class III 1804 dollar not pictured here, Proof-55. This is a whopping 15 points higher than everyone else had graded it. Q. David Bowers graded it EF-40 in his 1993 book Silver Dollars and Trade Dollars of the United States: A Complete Encyclopedia. Walter Breen graded it EF in his 1988 book Complete Encyclopedia of U.S. and Colonial Coins. Eric P. Newman and Kenneth E. Bressett graded it extremely fine in their 1962 book The Fantastic 1804 Dollar. When it was last sold, in 1980 as part of the Garrett sale, it was also graded EF-40. Before NGC graded it Proof-55, ANACS had graded it, also EF-40.
The above examples of sleight-of-hand grading with 1804 dollars by the legitimate grading companies may boost the selling prices of these coins, and it creates an incentive for those selling these kinds of coins to submit them for treatment like this, but it doesn't reflect well on the grading services or numismatics.
----
professional courtesy or am i missing something here? ;-)
<< <i>
<< <i>I know of one dealer who gets very miffed when his borderline coins don't make "his" grade. He feels that the TPGs should upgrade such coins as a professional courtesy. >>
he's right
K S >>
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Al
HE? how about she?
If you want the best shot at getting an upgrade, have Heritage send it in prior to the Auction. Heaps and Heaps of BU coins are borderline and could go either way. TPG's also generate more income grading conservative the first few times. It's all a game, period.
<< <i>Yes they should... after the thousands I've dropped at PCGS they should
not only ask me what grades I want but supply an easy-to-use-form for said purpose. >>
No wonder you're wearing fruit in your icon
Free Trial
then take them to Dealer B who by contract is obliged to honor his PCGS bid price for any coin offered, the
market model would have failed years ago.
<< <i>In my opinion TPG S overgrade all coins as it is.I belive this is called market grading. >>
Their purpose was to market grade coins. With technical grading, coins of the same grade can be worth 50% or 300%
of the base price. Market grading deducts points for weakly struck or unattractive toning, and add points for eye appeal, thus the grade on the slab is a "market" (valuation) grade.
<< <i>
<< <i>In my opinion TPG S overgrade all coins as it is.I belive this is called market grading. >>
Their purpose was to market grade coins. With technical grading, coins of the same grade can be worth 50% or 300%
of the base price. Market grading deducts points for weakly struck or unattractive toning, and add points for eye appeal, thus the grade on the slab is a "market" (valuation) grade. >>
another forum member put it a different way. they rank coins.
market grading is just another term for them being unable to grade
a gem from 20 years ago as 65 anymore.
now it is a 66-67. they have to rank the coin because they cannot have
an obviously superior coin in a 65 holder being compared to the rest.
so they rank them with a 1-70 point basis.
market grading == ranking == grade inflation
<< <i>
<< <i>I know of one dealer who gets very miffed when his borderline coins don't make "his" grade. He feels that the TPGs should upgrade such coins as a professional courtesy. He apparently feels that this is just something that any business should do for another business.
Comment... >>
Comment? Yea! The dealer you mentioned is a dumbass! >>
<< <i>I know of one dealer who gets very miffed when his borderline coins don't make "his" grade. He feels that the TPGs should upgrade such coins as a professional courtesy. He apparently feels that this is just something that any business should do for another business.
Comment... >>
Ahh, I love living in the era of entitlement!
Rob
"Those guys weren't Fathers they were...Mothers."
<< <i>
<< <i>In my opinion TPG S overgrade all coins as it is.I belive this is called market grading. >>
Their purpose was to market grade coins. With technical grading, coins of the same grade can be worth 50% or 300%
of the base price. Market grading deducts points for weakly struck or unattractive toning, and add points for eye appeal, thus the grade on the slab is a "market" (valuation) grade. >>
But since the "market" changes (and it does change), the market grade can change accordingly. With technical grading, the rules are more defined. Yes, coins of the same technical grade can be worth 50% or 300% of the base price, but that decision should be left up to the market, not a third party.
"Should coins be overgraded by TPG's as a professional courtesy?"
Say what???
If someone submits a coin , they are trusting the party to whom they've sent the coin, and paid to grade. So a dealer who submits more should get more because the company that grades them gets more money from that dealer.
The more I spend, the better my chances of getting the grades I want
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5