Raw toned 1892-CC, think this is NT or AT?

Colorfulcoins · October 7, 2007 3:32AM

TonedCoinTrader · October 7, 2007 3:43AM

I don't like the colors and can't say I've seen them like that in any of the top 3 holders as NT.

I say AT.

TomB · October 7, 2007 3:45AM

I do not like that coin at all.

ricko · October 7, 2007 3:48AM

Assisted toning. Cheers, RickO

jpo1965 · October 7, 2007 3:54AM

vam 2?

GoldenEyeNumismatics · October 7, 2007 3:56AM

Definitely AT

AUandAG · October 7, 2007 3:56AM

When a silver coin tones naturally it does not leave the devices untoned at the edges. For instance,
the stars on the obverse have nice little untoned outlines around them. Hmmm, not the way silver
tones naturally. There is no reason that the natural toning of the silver would omit this part of the coin.
bob

UtahCoin · October 7, 2007 4:48AM

AT all the way

Deadhorse · October 7, 2007 4:53AM

<< <i>AT all the way >>

Yep. So many giveaways on that one being AT'd. Too bad, nice coin there to start with.

Unknown · October 7, 2007 4:55AM

This content has been removed.

SUMORADA · October 7, 2007 5:15AM

Hope they rinsed it or it might keep goin......

NumisOxide · October 7, 2007 5:25AM

AT

rainbowroosie · October 7, 2007 7:54AM

AT

coinkat · October 7, 2007 8:08AM

Run Forrest run... don't look back!

tightbudget · October 7, 2007 8:08AM

AT

Colorfulcoins · October 7, 2007 8:21AM

I was browsing ebay and came across this GEM....the blue caught my eye (as well as the BIN price) and although I thought AT, I figured I'd see how the Board felt.....and the result is pretty clear!

JRH · October 7, 2007 11:25AM

I'd have to say AT as well.

kryptonitecomics · October 7, 2007 12:12PM

<< <i>

<< <i>When a silver coin tones naturally it does not leave the devices untoned at the edges. For instance,
the stars on the obverse have nice little untoned outlines around them. Hmmm, not the way silver
tones naturally. There is no reason that the natural toning of the silver would omit this part of the coin.
bob

>>

I was just wondering if the above statement is accurate, because I have seen many silver coins where the stars are untoned and they are in top tpg holders (whether that means anything). I was wondering if Tom can comment on this?

>>

That statement is not entirely accurate....in a lot of cases the stars on a Morgan dollar obverse have an untoned "halo if you will" around them becuase of the flow lines etc that were created when the coin was first struck. Those area typically don't tone at the same rate as the rest of the coin and in some cases may not tone at all. In my experience...the presence of these untoned areas around devices tends to lend critibiality to the toning being legit as when chemicals etc are applied you tend to get 100% coverage of color in all areas.

AnkurJ · October 7, 2007 1:03PM

I think its NT, but its not one I would buy raw.

anablep · October 7, 2007 1:07PM

I say market unacceptable, therefore AT. If just the reverse was toned the way it is, I'd say NT, but the obverse looks wrong, though not as bad as many AT'd Morgans.