Home U.S. Coin Forum

What exactly do I have here (mystery medal) UNIQUE ?

dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭
Without revealing too many details, I'll just say that this medal was not distributed via normal channels.
It is a US Mint John Adams President medal, bronze, 1-5/16". Nothing special about that. The US Mint currently has them for sale on their web site.

The Mint's web site states that all these medals are made in Philadelphia. And every example of this medal that I've been able to view so far concurs with that.

Except for this one, that is. It has a hand-punched "D" mint mark above the date. It appears that the dies (or hubs) for this piece were quite worn.
The letters are mushy, and there are some strange machining marks on the obverse. However, the "D" mint mark is sharp (as if freshly punched into an older die).

And to top it off, the reverse is a doubled die.

So did the Denver Mint produce a quantity of these early-on, or is this a unique test piece that escaped the Mint ?

Obverse:
image

Reverse:
image

Obverse marks:
image

Reverse doubled die:
image

Mint mark close-up:
image

Comments

  • TexastTexast Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭✭
    Looks like it was Laser Engraved, if not the medal itself then the dies.
    On BS&T Now: Nothing.
    Fighting the Fight for 11 Years with the big "C" - Never Ever Give Up!
    Member PCGS Open Forum board 2002 - 2006 (closed end of 2006) Current board since 2006 Successful trades with many members, over the past two decades, never a bad deal.
  • The inside rim on the obv. looks odd or off center...........
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,579 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The soft, mushy detail makes it look like a casting.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • notwilightnotwilight Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭
    Very cool. I like your analysis but don't understand the fresh D on worn dies. the medal has a sandblasted look like perhaps the dies were sandblasted before the D was applied.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Daniel, The enlarged shot of the collar looks so much like a fingerprint... but it appears to be 'in' the metal... not sure how this could happen, but even the whorls become apparent at the top of the collar. Any comments?? Cheers, RickO
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Anybody been to the Denver Mint's souvenir shop lately? Maybe they are selling them there.
    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,834 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a halo around that D. Perhaps a good soak in acetone will take care of the problem?

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • au58au58 Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭
    Is that a seam? Any chance a "D" was punched up from a machined obverse and put back together with a machined reverse?
  • sumnomsumnom Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭
    I prefer this design to the one now in circulation.
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Looks like a halo around that D. Perhaps a good soak in acetone will take care of the problem?

    bobimage >>



    The "D" is sitting in a slight depression on the medal, which results in the appearance of the "halo".
    But this is as expected. Think about punching a "D" into a die using a hand punch and hammer.
    Doing so would displace metal, causing a slight bulge on the die around the sunken "D".
    This bulge then results in a shallow depression around the "D" on the struck medal.
    This effect can sometimes be used to help authenticate genuine mint marks.
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Is that a seam? Any chance a "D" was punched up from a machined obverse and put back together with a machined reverse? >>



    No, not a seam. That is a reasonable theory, but knowing the source of this medal, there is no chance of that scenario.
  • I think you recut the whole medal with a laser and left the D off of the cutting path.
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I think you recut the whole medal with a laser and left the D off of the cutting path. >>



    imageimage

    Actually, a laser is no good at this sort of thing. Lasers are good for cutting out shapes. They are not very good at cutting metal unless the wattage is very high. But the big limitation with lasers is that there is no way to consistently control the depth of cut.

  • It was just a guess... I wasn't saying that you "controlled the cut" but that you passed over the whole thing.
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It was just a guess... I wasn't saying that you "controlled the cut" but that you passed over the whole thing. >>



    Yes, it would be possible to run a laser over an existing coin. If that were done, the laser marks would be most prevalent on the flat parts of the coin (where the surface is perpendicular to the incoming beam). And the laser marks would be less prevalent at the edges of the devices where the surface slope is the steepest.

    But that is the opposite effect to what is seen on this medal. The machining marks on this Adams medal are consistent with a reduction lathe running on a "coarse" setting.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Is that what gives the appearance of a fingerprint on the collar??? Cheers, RickO
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Is that what gives the appearance of a fingerprint on the collar??? Cheers, RickO >>



    Yes, I believe those are machining marks on Adams' collar.
    Note that they are somewhat concentric about the center of the medal.
    The "1797" date also shows similar marks to a lesser degree.
  • Stands for "Denver". If you get one at the Denver Mint gift shop, it has a "D" on it, or at least they used to.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    It's a product of the U.S.Mint.

    You can buy one for $38.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    Actually, the one from the mint does not have a mint mark so now I'm a bit perplexed.



    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!


  • << <i>Actually, the one from the mint does not have a mint mark so now I'm a bit perplexed. >>



    hence the reason for the thread.
  • notwilightnotwilight Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It's a product of the U.S.Mint. You can buy one for $38. >>



    And then if you're a 1914 cent doctor you're home free.
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Stands for "Denver". If you get one at the Denver Mint gift shop, it has a "D" on it, or at least they used to. >>



    Do you happen to have one ? Can you confirm that they were issued at one time with a "D" ?
    The Denver Mint gift shop sells plenty of items minted in Philadelphia (they used to, anyway -
    I haven't visited there in a long time).


  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ttt - one more time in case anybody has info.
  • Looks like some one added a D
    D is very sharp while the rest of the lettering is soft struck


  • << <i>Looks like some one added a D >>



    I wonder who could've done that?
  • I will try to hunt down the one I got there. I don't think it was Adams though. Probably Jefferson. If I find it, and there is a "D", I'll post a pic. Don't hold your breath though, it could be anywhere! I think I got it 15 years ago, maybe longer.
  • Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Found this one but it has no D mint mark from Philadelphia. looks like some one my have put the D on it. image


    Hoard the keys.
  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maybe impact dies with added "D" punch? image


    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Found this one but it has no D mint mark from Philadelphia. looks like some one my have put the D on it. image >>



    That one looks like the larger 3-inch version. Those come with a matte/antiqued finish.
    The 1-5/16" version that I have supposedly comes with a brilliant (UNC) finish.
    And it looks to me like my example came with the brilliant finish (somewhat subdued now).

    As I stated at the beginning of this thread, the origin of this medal is interesting.
    I can not yet divulge the source, but I am certain that this medal was struck at the
    Denver Mint from dies that had a hand-punched "D" mint mark.


  • FrankcoinsFrankcoins Posts: 4,571 ✭✭✭
    These small versions were indeed made at the Denver and Philadelphia mints in the 1970s. A single hub was made with a reduction lathe using one of the 3 inch medals as a model, resulting in the soft details and lathe marks transferred to the medals, which sold for 50 cents or so. These were done about the same time the Denver only mint sets with the mint medal were sold. They are not rare, worth perhaps $3 on a good day. Better quality small medals, made from newly prepared models, are now offered.

    Here is John QUINCY Adams with D mintmark

    image
    Frank Provasek - PCGS Authorized Dealer, Life Member ANA, Member TNA. www.frankcoins.com
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sounds right.
    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>These small versions were indeed made at the Denver and Philadelphia mints in the 1970s. A single hub was made with a reduction lathe using one of the 3 inch medals as a model, resulting in the soft details and lathe marks transferred to the medals, which sold for 50 cents or so. These were done about the same time the Denver only mint sets with the mint medal were sold. They are not rare, worth perhaps $3 on a good day. Better quality small medals, made from newly prepared models, are now offered.

    Here is John QUINCY Adams with D mintmark

    image >>



    Thanks. That is what I figured, but had to check anyway. I believe that mine was made after 1986, though.
    I do think these Denver medals are quite a bit scarcer than the Philadelphia versions. I still want to see a
    picture of a John Adams medal with "D", if anyone has one.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file