You aren't kidding, Russ, you hardly see them come up for auction at all. I don't have access to the pop reports, but I know there aren't many. I wish I knew it was coming up, I would have set some money aside.
There are only two of them graded, that one and a 66CAM. Never saw one of them in an auction before, not that I follow the series closely though.
They don't show up in the new Auction Prices linked on the PCGS front page either. BTW, I like that new feature. It is very convenient and only just noticed it recently.
I want it (but I can't afford it!). The photos aren't helping- they don't even make it look proof!
--Christian
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
Last I saw it was at $2350, then hit my browser back, refreshed and went to $2200? Strange??
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
I was lucky at the April Santa Clara show. Our own Skyman owns one of the 1938 Cameo proof walkers. He brought it to the show and I got to see the coin in hand. It looked very close in appearance to a Proof ASE. A stuuner of a coin.
I somewhat question what this '42 looks like in hand.
TT might not be the best imagers, but they are not bad. Take a look at all the other coins that are graded Cameo that they've taken pictures of. You get a fairly decent view of the cameo contrast. I'll grant you the Walker is probably tougher to image, but still...
FWIW, my coin is not a Kool Aid coin. It is an NGC coin, a 1938 PR66Cameo. With all due respect to the '42 in question, This is what a cameo Walker is supposed to look like.
I agree, but that's the nature of the beast, I suppose. That's no doubt why there are so few CAMs. I have yet to see a really amazing CAM Wheatie, either, for that matter. Sure, I've seen some pix of CAMs, but they too did not seem to have much contrast.
I have seen a PCGS 66 cam Walker in hand and had the chance to buy it. I think it was the '39 but am not absolutely sure. It was a nice coin but I didn't think it deserved a $10k pricetag - kind of a cam minus on the cameo scale. Anyway, I passed and have never regretted it.
And Lord Marcovan - here is an early wheatie for you. I found it trapped in an old ANACS holder with no cameo designation. Got it for about $100, cracked it out and it came back 65 cameo. IMHO, a solid cameo, not a gift.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
Comments
-Paul
They don't show up in the new Auction Prices linked on the PCGS front page either. BTW, I like that new feature. It is very convenient and only just noticed it recently.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
you gonna get that one Russ?
<< <i>you gonna get that one Russ? >>
If he was I don't think he'd have posted the auction link.
Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.
Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
<< <i>Crappy photos though. >>
<< <i>Full blazing mint brilliance. Bold CAMEO effect frosted devices. Glittering deeply reflective fields. >>
Hard to see those from the photo for me.
--Christian
Will’sProoflikes
Will’sProoflikes
'38: 1 66, 1 67
'39: 1 64, 1 66
'42: 2 65, 1 66
No DCAMs
Would love to see the one in 67.
"Teletrade photos suck, hard. I can almost garauntee you the coin looks nicer in hand."
I agree. I would bet you can capture MUCH better reflectivity than TT did.
Would like to see this one with a skilled photographer.
TT might not be the best imagers, but they are not bad. Take a look at all the other coins that are graded Cameo that they've taken pictures of. You get a fairly decent view of the cameo contrast. I'll grant you the Walker is probably tougher to image, but still...
FWIW, my coin is not a Kool Aid coin. It is an NGC coin, a 1938 PR66Cameo. With all due respect to the '42 in question, This is what a cameo Walker is supposed to look like.
U.S. Type Set
<< <i>seems weak for a cameo >>
I agree, but that's the nature of the beast, I suppose. That's no doubt why there are so few CAMs. I have yet to see a really amazing CAM Wheatie, either, for that matter. Sure, I've seen some pix of CAMs, but they too did not seem to have much contrast.
And Lord Marcovan - here is an early wheatie for you. I found it trapped in an old ANACS holder with no cameo designation. Got it for about $100, cracked it out and it came back 65 cameo. IMHO, a solid cameo, not a gift.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
Yep, that'll do 'er! OT, but what a gorgeous cam '38 wheatie, too.
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>What do you think about this one Russ, a solid CAM or a liner? >>
Based on the images, I would not grade it a cameo.
Russ, NCNE