You aren't kidding, Russ, you hardly see them come up for auction at all. I don't have access to the pop reports, but I know there aren't many. I wish I knew it was coming up, I would have set some money aside.
There are only two of them graded, that one and a 66CAM. Never saw one of them in an auction before, not that I follow the series closely though.
They don't show up in the new Auction Prices linked on the PCGS front page either. BTW, I like that new feature. It is very convenient and only just noticed it recently.
I want it (but I can't afford it!). The photos aren't helping- they don't even make it look proof!
--Christian
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
Last I saw it was at $2350, then hit my browser back, refreshed and went to $2200? Strange??
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Will’sProoflikes
I was lucky at the April Santa Clara show. Our own Skyman owns one of the 1938 Cameo proof walkers. He brought it to the show and I got to see the coin in hand. It looked very close in appearance to a Proof ASE. A stuuner of a coin.
I somewhat question what this '42 looks like in hand.
TT might not be the best imagers, but they are not bad. Take a look at all the other coins that are graded Cameo that they've taken pictures of. You get a fairly decent view of the cameo contrast. I'll grant you the Walker is probably tougher to image, but still...
FWIW, my coin is not a Kool Aid coin. It is an NGC coin, a 1938 PR66Cameo. With all due respect to the '42 in question, This is what a cameo Walker is supposed to look like.
I agree, but that's the nature of the beast, I suppose. That's no doubt why there are so few CAMs. I have yet to see a really amazing CAM Wheatie, either, for that matter. Sure, I've seen some pix of CAMs, but they too did not seem to have much contrast.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
I have seen a PCGS 66 cam Walker in hand and had the chance to buy it. I think it was the '39 but am not absolutely sure. It was a nice coin but I didn't think it deserved a $10k pricetag - kind of a cam minus on the cameo scale. Anyway, I passed and have never regretted it.
And Lord Marcovan - here is an early wheatie for you. I found it trapped in an old ANACS holder with no cameo designation. Got it for about $100, cracked it out and it came back 65 cameo. IMHO, a solid cameo, not a gift.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
Comments
-Paul
They don't show up in the new Auction Prices linked on the PCGS front page either. BTW, I like that new feature. It is very convenient and only just noticed it recently.
NSDR - Life Member
SSDC - Life Member
ANA - Pay As I Go Member
you gonna get that one Russ?
<< <i>you gonna get that one Russ? >>
If he was I don't think he'd have posted the auction link.
Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.
Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
<< <i>Crappy photos though. >>
<< <i>Full blazing mint brilliance. Bold CAMEO effect frosted devices. Glittering deeply reflective fields. >>
Hard to see those from the photo for me.
--Christian
Will’sProoflikes
Will’sProoflikes
'38: 1 66, 1 67
'39: 1 64, 1 66
'42: 2 65, 1 66
No DCAMs
Would love to see the one in 67.
"Teletrade photos suck, hard. I can almost garauntee you the coin looks nicer in hand."
I agree. I would bet you can capture MUCH better reflectivity than TT did.
Would like to see this one with a skilled photographer.
TT might not be the best imagers, but they are not bad. Take a look at all the other coins that are graded Cameo that they've taken pictures of. You get a fairly decent view of the cameo contrast. I'll grant you the Walker is probably tougher to image, but still...
FWIW, my coin is not a Kool Aid coin. It is an NGC coin, a 1938 PR66Cameo. With all due respect to the '42 in question, This is what a cameo Walker is supposed to look like.
U.S. Type Set
<< <i>seems weak for a cameo >>
I agree, but that's the nature of the beast, I suppose. That's no doubt why there are so few CAMs. I have yet to see a really amazing CAM Wheatie, either, for that matter. Sure, I've seen some pix of CAMs, but they too did not seem to have much contrast.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
And Lord Marcovan - here is an early wheatie for you. I found it trapped in an old ANACS holder with no cameo designation. Got it for about $100, cracked it out and it came back 65 cameo. IMHO, a solid cameo, not a gift.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
Yep, that'll do 'er! OT, but what a gorgeous cam '38 wheatie, too.
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>What do you think about this one Russ, a solid CAM or a liner? >>
Based on the images, I would not grade it a cameo.
Russ, NCNE