Home U.S. Coin Forum

Poll: Do you like it or not like it? (Gobrecht dollar)

RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
Yesterday's installment was interesting, and quite a few people participated, so I thought I would do it again. Today's index coin will be the ever-popular and controversial Gobrecht dollar, once again a coin offered in an upcoming Heritage sale. Since TDN is forcing me to buy a pair image , I ought to learn more about these. image

Here are the Heritage photographs:

image

image

image

image

Do you like it overall? What do you like/dislike about it?

Obviously, any impression is based on the photos and one's perception of how the coin may look in-hand. In real life, these decisions should not be made on the basis of photos, no matter how accurate, high-quality, or attractive. (Longacre made me add this statement image )

Comments

  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    I love the reverse, but not a fan of the Obv.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've seen that one before and would avoid it myself. The reverse E on the obverse right-side field is too much of a distraction for me. It's like the coin having a tattoo.
  • ttownttown Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I've seen that one before and would avoid it myself. The reverse E on the obverse right-side field is too much of a distraction for me. It's like the coin having a tattoo. >>




    Looks like someone etched that with a pencil eraser.image
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,253 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the 1836 G$ but this particular one, no. The markings in the right field of the obverse toning are very distracting.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Not a bad example, I would just see if you could buy one of TDN's better duplicates. image

    I think you can do better than the one posted.

    I voted that I liked it because I have seen some horrible re-toned dipped out proofs and this one is better than most.


  • << <i>I voted that I liked it because I have seen some horrible re-toned dipped out proofs and this one is better than most. >>



    Voted yes because I would be happy to own this at the right price. I find it at least... likable.
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    I don't like the mark on the obverse.

    Why don't you shut off the computer, hop in the car, and go to the EAC convention? Then perhaps this Silver Silliness™ will come to an end. image
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • ElKevvoElKevvo Posts: 4,139 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I voted no...but with the caveat that I assumed I would be in the position to buy one! I like it but that obverse mark is a bit of a distraction.
    ANA LM
  • richardshipprichardshipp Posts: 5,647 ✭✭✭
    I voted YES because that is likely the closest I'll ever come to owning one
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's a question. For the people voting for liking the coin, do you like it as a "compromise coin" or on an absolute basis? If you had this coin, would you think of the CRO article What should you do with a sub-par coin? or would you never think this is compromise or sub-par?

    It seems like most of the people saying they like this coin are doing so because they feel it would be available at a lower price than a non-marked version. I either like the coin or I don't, independent of price.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Here's a question. For the people voting for liking the coin, do you like it as a "compromise coin" or on an absolute basis? If you had this coin, would you think of the CRO article What should you do with a sub-par coin? or would you never think this is compromise or sub-par? >>



    Compromise until something better came along. Not sure I would get rid of it at that point though because even with the mark on the obverse it is not sub-par by any means.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If I were in the position to buy a PR64 1836 Gobrecht, I would most likely compare among those available and not choose this one.
  • This content has been removed.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>A dumb newbe's opinion: I like it better than the dipped white ones , however the fact that it is slabbed by NGC makes me insecure, if it was in a PCGS holder then I could see forking out that kind of money and feeling secure. Got to wonder why it isn't in a PCGS holder, if it were mine I would have sent it in to PCGS, so maybe NGC graded it higher or graded it and that was the difference. So either you are over paying for the jump in the grade or PCGS not only would lower the grade but may in fact bb for some unknown reason as slime a chance as that may be one never knows with NGC (again considering the dollars spent here). >>



    Why would you say this? Some of the best coins in the world are in NGC slabs and they actually do pretty good at grading this series.
  • Yes I like it. Other then the weird "non-tone" white lines on the obverse, what's not to like?
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Other then the weird "non-tone" white lines on the obverse, what's not to like? >>

    That's only valid if you can get over the weird white lines.

    Your argument is similar to saying a Morgan with a big gouge across Liberty's face is fine because, other than the gouge, what's not to like image
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    Better than the dipped out crap for sure, but those toning breaks in the right obverse are distracting and would be the first thing I notice every time I looked at the coin.
  • DarkmaneDarkmane Posts: 1,021
    It's beautiful, and I'd love to own it...

    ... but I refuse to pay that much money for a coin with anything I would call a problem.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,698 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the price was right I could overlook the odd toning mark in the obverse field.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My take:

    Overall, I like appearance of the coin very much. I am not hip to grading these, but the strike looks terrific, I do not see any rub/friction, and the look is original. The toning breaks are more of a distraction in the magnified, high light intensity shot than they are in the slab shot and could very well be the reason the coin is only a 64. I do not plan to be a bidder for it, but I will inspect it in-hand at the show.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Is there any way a doctor could remove or diminish the toning breaks?
  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭
    Nice reverse, but the tatoo on the obverse turns me off (so do tatoos on women!).


    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Is there any way a doctor could remove or diminish the toning breaks? >>

    Either by AT'ing the breaks or by dipping the coin. Take your pick. image
  • taxbuster1040taxbuster1040 Posts: 351 ✭✭✭
    I would consider it a problem coin and generally avoid problem coins unless i cant afford the non problem coins of the same type. So i would not buy it.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the coin, but not the toning..... Cheers, RickO
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,826 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It beats the dickens out of the one I own that is a PR-50 that is now in an NGC PR-60 holder, but you really have to SEE these coins when they hit this grade to decide what you are willing to pay. The two lines in the toning don’t bother me very much given that it is graded PR-64. The question is, how nice are the mirrors? You can’t get that from a photo.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    i am going to step up to the plate and say i like it a lot
    from the pics. i want original coins and that one appears to be
    so. i do not mind that mark, it is a pretty good sign people have
    left the coin alone and not messed with it.

    it would also be fun to track back the owners of it. it must be
    hard to forget a monster coin like that with the "E".

    i wish i could afford it. very nice!
  • I like them, but they often come with absolutely hideous toning
  • mcheathmcheath Posts: 2,439 ✭✭✭
    I like it based on the images. A very attractive design on both the obverse and reverse. I find it to be an attractive example but seeing this one in hand would be a must.
  • speetyspeety Posts: 5,424
    Personally the marks on the obverse in the right field kill the coin for me. I love the reverse though!
    Want to buy an auction catalog for the William Hesslein Sale (December 2, 1926). Thanks to all those who have helped us obtain the others!!!

  • prooflikeprooflike Posts: 3,879 ✭✭
    love it, would look great in my dollar collection...

    My b-day is coming up - maybe you'll get it as a present for me ??

    (my wife is way too poor...)

    image
  • stev32kstev32k Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭
    I think it's like most coins, paintings, or real estate - it depends on the price. Anyone would love it at $1.98, but might not like it at all at $1,000,000. So the answer is - it depends on the price.
    Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I think it's like most coins, paintings, or real estate - it depends on the price. Anyone would love it at $1.98, but might not like it at all at $1,000,000. So the answer is - it depends on the price. >>



    I disagree. I think that you can like/dislike something for what it is, irrespective of the price.

    BTW, what is the proper pronunciation of Gobrecht? Long "o" or short "o". I have heard it both ways.
  • Well OK, I guess I could "settle" for that one, stripes and all.
    What makes Gobrechts controversial?
    BST: Gerard Tdec1000 Scrapman1077 Dropdaflag SeaEagleCoins cucamongacoin whatsup 49thStateofMind ajia DoubleEagle59 johngerman funbunch jnd1955 ACactions PCcoins ArizonaJack feeter277 dsessom JBdimes emteeuu savoyspecial greencopper ....
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,002 ✭✭✭✭✭
    All Gobrecht dollars are cool.

    I like the overall look of this piece but the mark in the obverse field is distracting. It would depend on the price.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>What makes Gobrechts controversial? >>

    They're not controversial anymore. TDN has convinced RYK he needs two for his type set image
  • I don't need convincing, I'm pretty sure I also need two of those.
    Too many coins, too little money.
    Not enough focus.
    D'oh!
    BST: Gerard Tdec1000 Scrapman1077 Dropdaflag SeaEagleCoins cucamongacoin whatsup 49thStateofMind ajia DoubleEagle59 johngerman funbunch jnd1955 ACactions PCcoins ArizonaJack feeter277 dsessom JBdimes emteeuu savoyspecial greencopper ....
  • BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,515 ✭✭✭✭✭
    that would be a coin I would regret buying.
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,939 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That does not thrill me either. At first I thought it was a Chop mark of some
    sort and then put my glasses on to see what it was.....It was distracting for
    sure and not what I'd call pleasing to view. Perhaps if I saw it in person I
    would think differently. The drab obverse color with the marks shoot it down.
    Lovely reverse and great dollar design.
    bob
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If I were in the position to buy a PR64 1836 Gobrecht, I would most likely compare among those available and not choose this one. >>


    image

    Or even look at available pieces in lower grades and select one that has better eye appeal. This one doesn't do it for me.
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    So what's the decision, or are you saving your funds for a Big Purchase at today's EAC convention?????
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>So what's the decision, or are you saving your funds for a Big Purchase at today's EAC convention????? >>



    I was never in the running for this Gobrecht.
  • mirabelamirabela Posts: 5,103 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like everything about it except the Chinese looking toning break that grabs everyone's eye. I can understand 291's logic that if the price were right that could be overlooked, but it would never work for me. Even an adjusted price on such an item would constitute such a serious chunk of change for me that if I did not love the coin 110% I could never see buying it. True, I'd be unlikely to buy a coin that expensive anyway, whether or not the money were available. Still, when shopping at the top end of my range I try to only buy coins that have no flies on them at all.
    mirabela
  • MercMerc Posts: 1,647 ✭✭
    ttt, This is a good match for today's new post.
    Looking for a coin club in Maryland? Try:
    FrederickCoinClub
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,852 ✭✭✭
    I love the design and think it is a beautiful coin.

    Just not this particular coin.

    -------------

    etexmike
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>My take:

    Overall, I like appearance of the coin very much. I am not hip to grading these, but the strike looks terrific, I do not see any rub/friction, and the look is original. The toning breaks are more of a distraction in the magnified, high light intensity shot than they are in the slab shot and could very well be the reason the coin is only a 64. I do not plan to be a bidder for it, but I will inspect it in-hand at the show. >>



    I did inspect the coin in person and liked it, but did not love it. For me, if I were spending that kind of money, I would have to love it. Of course, at the right price, I would like it enough to own it.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>however the fact that it is slabbed by NGC makes me insecure, if it was in a PCGS holder then I could see forking out that kind of money and feeling secure. >>



    That being the case, there's a very pretty toned Gobrecht in a PCGS holder that you might want to pursue. Of course, you'll need to overlook the fact that it used to be white and housed in an NCS problem holder.

    Russ, NCNE
  • greghansengreghansen Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭
    For a PF64 I don't think it's eye appeal is lacking pretty substantially.

    Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file