Options
Someone decide, Are the Presidential Dollars with the edge readable face up Type 1 and face down Typ
It would be nice if there were a standard set early, it would seem that you would need both for a set.
Any Ideas from the pro's?
Any Ideas from the pro's?
On BS&T Now: Nothing.
Fighting the Fight for 11 Years with the big "C" - Never Ever Give Up!
Member PCGS Open Forum board 2002 - 2006 (closed end of 2006) Current board since 2006 Successful trades with many members, over the past two decades, never a bad deal.
Fighting the Fight for 11 Years with the big "C" - Never Ever Give Up!
Member PCGS Open Forum board 2002 - 2006 (closed end of 2006) Current board since 2006 Successful trades with many members, over the past two decades, never a bad deal.
0
Comments
Proud recipient of two "You Suck" awards
It's amazing to me that a little fleck of metal on a Morgan is heralded as a VAM, but something as dramatic as this is mostly ignored.
<< <i>"Type" is probably too strong a word, but they are indeed different. >>
variety
As for collecting them, I can see one not caring one way or the other, collecting a set which has only one edge orientation all the way through, or collecting those including both edge orientations for each date/mint/president. All would be ok, and I'm sure there are other ways.
Ed. S.
(EJS)
<< <i>In a different thread I used the term "edge orientation varieties."
As for collecting them, I can see one not caring one way or the other, collecting a set which has only one edge orientation all the way through, or collecting those including both edge orientations for each date/mint/president. All would be ok, and I'm sure there are other ways. >>
I think a lot will depend on what the slabbing companies do. If PCGS decided to label the coins as varieties, and made a reg set for them, you can bet that the Kool-Aid drinkers would be tripping over themselves to collect them.
I don't think it's actually a very good name (and certainly not intuitive to understand) but it's very short, and that's what's needed. Nothing really wrong with Type 1 and Type 2, but usually that's applied to something that came out in a sequence (type 1 was made before type 2) and not simultaneously.
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
My opinion.
<< <i>I cannot see it making a difference. >>
We're talkin' about coin collectors here.......
Should any consideration be given to the position of the edge lettering with regards to the obverse and reverse designs? The way that the edge lettering is put on, it can start anywhere.
How's this for an idea: assign a clock value based on the obverse and the location of the mint mark. (The mint mark works well because it's a single easily identifiable mark.)
So you'd have 12 varieties for the obverse up orientation, 12 more for the reverse up, plus those amounts again for each mint. You'd need 48 separate coins for a complete circulation set
<< <i>Nothing really wrong with Type 1 and Type 2, but usually that's applied to something that came out in a sequence (type 1 was made before type 2) and not simultaneously. >>
Actually, if I'm not mistaken, the Wide AM/Close AM Lincolns were made simultaneously just with the wrong dies and these are often refered to a Type 1/Type 2.
Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies.
coin can be rightside up or upside down and then the lettering can be applied
either way. This would mean four categories.
It is very difficult to detect which way the planchet was facing on the golden dol-
lars. It will be even more difficult after they circulate probably.
I predict collectors are going to have exceedingly little interest.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
But, if you find one on a proof, hold on to it. Proofs are to be oriented only one way.
I am feeling this way about the series in general.
<< <i>On dark side stuff I have seen this refered to as a variety. >>
Isn't this generally reserved for coins which are normally all with the same alignment?
Did the mint intentionally do this or will they discontinue it for future issues and have them oriented one way? This would be hard to do because the coins would all have to go in one way in the machine. Too time consuming?
Box of 20