Options
Poll!! Can you tell the AT coin? Results posted!
Coin #1


Coin #2


Coin #3


Coin #4




Coin #2


Coin #3


Coin #4


It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>They're all AT.
Russ, NCNE >>
Nope three of them are in holders.
<< <i><< They're all AT.
Russ, NCNE >>
Nope three of them are in holders. >>
Good thing AT coins never get in holders.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>They're all AT.
Russ, NCNE >>
Nope three of them are in holders. >>
That sure instills pure confidence.....
<< <i>Good thing coins are never AT'd in holders.
Russ, NCNE >>
Russ, NCNE
Each one looks like handiwork to me.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>Good thing AT coins never get in holders. >>
#2. I tend to agree with Russ. I think all four coins are probably AT. I don't care for the toning patterns on any of them. Quite often natual toning is darker toward the outside of the coin and gets lighter toward the center. There is just something that is not real about these pieces.
#3. If you twist my arm, I voted that #4 got the boot.
Don
<< <i>Looks like the same coin at different angles...... >>
That would be HILLARIOUS But two have an O mint mark and two are plain .... I also see different cracks on them. T'would have been funny though!
Semper ubi sub ubi
<< <i>Looks like the same coin at different angles...... >>
Can't be the same coin. Coins #1 & #3 are O mints, and the mint marks do not appear to be at the same position. Coins #2 & #4 have no mint marks, and I don't see any marks to indicate they are the same coin.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>I'll give it about an hour more... Now remember, I didn't say one is AT NGC did! >>
Well if NGC made the call then we know it's correct.
Either the lighting's funny or it's shinier than the others.
I still have a hard time thinking any are natural.
Joe
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
I'll be a bit different from the majority and say that coin #3 is the coin that NGC designated as AT, because the toning pattern on the reverse appears to conform with the lower contours of the coin inside of the wreath -- as if a liquid had settled there and colored that portion of the coin.
Stuart
Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal
"Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
U.S. Nickels Complete Set with Major Varieties, Circulation Strikes
U.S. Dimes Complete Set with Major Varieties, Circulation Strikes
I hope to learn a lesson. Thanks.
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
Toned Coins for sale @ tonedcointrader.com
<< <i>how do I view the results >>
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
<< <i>how do I view the results >>
Check out page 1, at the top where this thread began.
I agree. Some folks on this board can actually spot AT when they see it. Imagine that. I'm surprised coins #1 & #3 got so many votes for AT because they look typical O mint tone to me. I narrowed it down to #2 & #4 and picked #4 because it looked less original than #2 did. Out of the 101 people that actually had an opinion twice as many were correct than were wrong.
68.32% were right
31.68% were wrong
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso