Options
ILIKEDIMES,Im calling you out ! LINKIFIED !
100proof1957
Posts: 6,231 ✭
100proof1957
Posts: 6,231 ✭
Comments
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
That was quarterjack not ilikedimes
dimes needs to stand down or stand up !
Proof
Quarterjack is a stand up no BS guy !
ilikedimes has no balls !
Proof
What's that all about?
<< <i>ilikedimes has no balls !
What's that all about?
I'm with you on that question......
??????????????
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
and it is a 69 without the cam designation so I guess I BSed (sorta, old holder, I think itll cam)and theyre at the bank....i think theyre all pcgs tho
<< <i>Pissing match over ! >>
Looks like you showed that 13-year-old kid a thing or two.
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
I notice there are no DCAMS, this isn't a put down, please don't misunderstand. I don't do the registry thing, so I don't know. Is there a reason there are no DCAMS? Would you rather have it with a mixture of CAMS and DCAMS or just how does that work?
I ask because I've got a 57 quarter in a 67DCAM, is the DCAM designation worth more in that it would weigh more than a point higher than the same coin at CAM level?
Anyway, I just cherrypicked this one from a set and submitted it. I do collect '64 and back proof sets, but never even thought about having them all slabbed or the registry thing.
Just curious.
John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
7 DCAM is worth the same points as a 68 CAM for the registry
Dollar wise, different story
People have no idea how tough the 50's proofs are in Cams/ DCAMS
Check the POPS
Proof
i doubt that ilikedimes is a 13 yr old.
i am very proud of my set,worked long and hard to get it where it is and i refuse to let somebody denigrate it !
somebody with a better set will have enough class to put it in the registry and let the set speak for itself !
thats fine with me.
Just dont talk smack in an open forum if you can back it up !
Proof
<< <i>People have no idea how tough the 50's proofs are in Cams/ DCAMS
Check the POPS
Proof >>
Oh I know. Trust me there, I know about that aspect.
I've got a 50 Frankie in a 63 CAM, 54 Frankie in 64 CAM and the 57 I mentioned. Out of all the proof sets I have, and I have stacks of each year through the 50s, those three are it. Well, I do have a 50 Lincoln that would CAM if I submitted it, came from the same set as as the CAM Frankie, but it's probably no better than 63 and I've just never gotten around to submitting it. Don't know if it's even worth it.
Don't know the POPS, I don't have access to that.
John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
<< <i>i am very proud of my set,worked long and hard to get it where it is and i refuse to let somebody denigrate it ! >>
Makes sense to me
Said some nasty things to me in a PM
"Call me out" but I don't take that so serious. The Registry guys? Be very afraid. Heh
But, i was called out and Dimes never backed up his claims !
I didnt start this !
Dimes did !
<< <i>Yeah i know its childish.
But, i was called out and Dimes never backed up his claims ! >>
you were NOT "called out"..........last time, I DID NOT KNOW THE REGISTRY WAS SO SPECIALIZED. I WAS SURPRISED BY THAT FACT. I STATED IT. Someone, somewhere has better coins than me also. I AM NOT insulted nor do I feel "called out" if that someone says so. I did not imply what you inferred. SORRY if you felt I insulted you.......the end.
Oh come on- how old are we?
you get the pix and the pedigree !