From the images, it looks like it could be a 66 but the odds tell me it isn't.
Russ, please tell us about the darker/stained looking area near the reverse border from roughly 3:30 to 5:30 - is it toning that has eaten into the metal? Can you see through it? Is it darker or lighter in person? Etc. Thanks.
Members I have done business with: Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.
<< <i>Russ, please tell us about the darker/stained looking area near the reverse border from roughly 3:30 to 5:30 - is it toning that has eaten into the metal? Can you see through it? Is it darker or lighter in person? >>
It's a deep russet gold toning. There is some light planchet pitting in that area, but it looks like flaws rather than post mint corrosion.
It is also a good thing that I do not grade buffs for a living either and this coin is the poster child for a tough call which is not worthy of being in plastic at the grade of AU58. For the record, I like the coin and a MS62 seems appropriate even though the eye appeal is in th MS65 range.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
If you have the coin check for circ marks and the aforementioned rub on the hip. Also note: It might be a "problem" coin such as one with light cleaning....hence a downgrade. Other than that I can't think of a reason for less than MS. At worse, an MS63. Again, based on the picture.
I am not between those numbers. I'm over and under. 58 it is 'cause I saw the label . It could have been 64 or better. I don't think it could have been in between. Not enough hits. I see enough areas that look weakly struck or have rub.
I see Standing Lib Quarters with rubs on the leg but in MS 64+ holders. To me they are AU also...
Given the weakness of strike in the periphery, rather typical for the year, I'd give it a 63. Lovely coin.
Given my experience making PCGS AU58s (I have four such buffalos in my registry set, a record I suspect), I'd say check very closely on the eye brow and cheek bone as well.
Yes, these coins typically are well-struck. The only reason why I didn't think it was a 5 was the weak LIBERTY and the split tail was not "in your face" split.
Agree with JOM. You don't see a flat hip or softness in the Buf's head, which are two of the first places to look to determine an Unc. coin from a slider. Don't see any surface marks & thought it was a slam-dunk 4, maybe bumped to a 5 for color.
If someone could point out the wear on that coin, I'd like to see it.
"Vou invadir o Nordeste, "Seu cabra da peste, "Sou Mangueira......."
Comments
MS65
Chris
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
stunning picture(s) russ.
I cannot recommend Russ enough for his photos!
-Daniel
-Aristotle
Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
-Horace
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Russ, please tell us about the darker/stained looking area near the reverse border from roughly 3:30 to 5:30 - is it toning that has eaten into the metal? Can you see through it? Is it darker or lighter in person? Etc. Thanks.
Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.
<< <i>Russ, please tell us about the darker/stained looking area near the reverse border from roughly 3:30 to 5:30 - is it toning that has eaten into the metal? Can you see through it? Is it darker or lighter in person? >>
It's a deep russet gold toning. There is some light planchet pitting in that area, but it looks like flaws rather than post mint corrosion.
Russ, NCNE
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
U.S. Nickels Complete Set with Major Varieties, Circulation Strikes
U.S. Dimes Complete Set with Major Varieties, Circulation Strikes
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
It's a good thing I don't grade Buffalo Nickels for a living because I look at this coin and think it's mint state all day long.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
It's a good thing I don't grade Buffalo Nickels for a living because I look at this coin and think it's mint state all day long.
Russ, NCNE >>
Re-submit it, and it probably will be.
It is also a good thing that I do not grade buffs for a living either and this coin is the poster child for a tough call which is not worthy of being in plastic at the grade of AU58. For the record, I like the coin and a MS62 seems appropriate even though the eye appeal is in th MS65 range.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
jom
Russ, NCNE
jom
Typical strike for the date.
Nice coin, though.
Pete
Edited to add...........The toning does a lovely job hiding the rub.
Edited to add:
The name is LEE!
I am not between those numbers. I'm over and under. 58 it is 'cause I saw the label
I see Standing Lib Quarters with rubs on the leg but in MS 64+ holders. To me they are AU also...
Given my experience making PCGS AU58s (I have four such buffalos in my registry set, a record I suspect), I'd say check very closely on the eye brow and cheek bone as well.
CoolKarma
MS Buffalo
MS 1951
Agree with JOM. You don't see a flat hip or softness in the Buf's head, which are two of the first places to look to determine an Unc. coin from a slider. Don't see any surface marks & thought it was a slam-dunk 4, maybe bumped to a 5 for color.
If someone could point out the wear on that coin, I'd like to see it.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
I'd like an expert to point out the rub - I looked and looked and couldn't see it. I guess that it's good that PCGS doen't have to grade off of scans
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1