Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Grade the Mercury dime . . Vote in the poll *grade revealed*

BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
it's not often I upgrade the Dansco anymore but I found this coin will replace my current example of the Winged Liberty design:

image

image

care hazard your opinion as to the grade?

If you want to give "rattler" grade and grade under current standards that's ok too image

Darin-5 probably should refrain from commenting until the grade is posted, thanks for the coin! image

Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

Comments

  • Options
    Was probally in a 66FB holder... looks like a 67FB... no doubt on the FB, that thing is razor sharp image
    -George
    42/92
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,045 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll agree on the 67 FB. I used to own a PCGS 67 FB that looked like that.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    I'll take 67FB.
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,835 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A couple of very minor tick marks plus the the hazy toning I see in the word "liberty" and the legend at the top of the reverse say MS-66, FB to me. The strike is all there, but if the haziness I see is real, it's not quite up to the MS-67 level. MS-67 coins need to be really stunners.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    Waaaaaait a minute...is that a chunk of metal I see missing on the rim near 12:00 on the reverse? I'll have to rethink my grade. image

    If that's a hit in the rim, I'd say 66FB tops, and 65FB wouldn't shock me.
  • Options
    LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162
    Nice Coin! Went with 65 FB.
  • Options
    65 fb rim problems
    Collecting cleaned, scratched, scraped, AT and ugly POS coins for over 2 years now!
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,835 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>65 fb rim problems >>



    I don't think that the coin has rim problems. Those are the prongs that were used on the old PCGS "rattle holders."
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    I went with 67fb (the older holder may only say 66fb)

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Options
    Purty merc! image

    I voted 66FB
  • Options
    pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,860 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice coin ... my guess is it's a 66FB.


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thank you for your votes and comments, I will say at this time that it is neither MS68 nor AU58, you jokers! image

    Nor is it 64, while we're at it, if anyone wants to sell me pretty coins like this for MS64 money I'll pay "ask"

    edit: Oh, and I'll add that BillJones is right on, those three rim "dents" are the holder prongs.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    originalisbestoriginalisbest Posts: 5,971 ✭✭✭✭
    Yes, those are rim prongs, not damage. It's a twin to an old MS-66FB '39-D I once had, but that '39-D was slightly more of a blazer, and should've been a '67. This one I think is in a rattler MS-66FB, however it might've been undergraded as a 65FB.
  • Options
    I voted MS66 FB
  • Options
    mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    66fb
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • Options
    PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think I am looking at my recient graded dimes and say 64FB
    It looks like a 65FB but can't say pcgs would give the grade
    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • Options
    MS65FB


    imageimage
  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    Thanks again BigD! image

    I'd say it's accurately described as MS66FB and PQ in an old 65 holder

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
    Nice coin that is hammered!
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, the "hammer" helped get the coin out of the holder and into an album

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    don't think i voted back then, but i guessed 66 fsb just now

    K S
  • Options
    RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,627 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with MS67FB.

    Edit: I'd resubmit it to get the correct grade.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • Options
    65?......I voted 67fb before I looked
    imageDo not taunt Happy Fun Ball image
  • Options
    BurksBurks Posts: 1,103


    << <i>65?......I voted 67fb before I looked >>



    Same here. I've seen a 66 look worse than that coin. If you paid 65 money for it, good job!

    I have a 64 in the same type holder that couldn't hold a candle to that coin.
    WTB: Eric Plunk cards, jersey (signed or unsigned), and autographs. Basically anything related to him

    Positive BST: WhiteThunder (x2), Ajaan, onefasttalon, mirabela, Wizard1, cucamongacoin, mccardguy1


    Negative BST: NONE!
  • Options
    mcheathmcheath Posts: 2,441 ✭✭✭
    i went 66fb. and it could go 67. i just couldn't go 67fb wihtout seeing it in hand. it looks every bit of 67 from the images though.
  • Options
    mcheathmcheath Posts: 2,441 ✭✭✭
    just noticed that the grade was posted in thread. easily a 66. id pay 65 money for it any day.
  • Options
    FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,428 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A lot of 67's in the poll. I did not see 67 at all with this coin. I wavered between 64 and 65 and then went 65FB. The coin just has no wow to make 67.

    Ken
  • Options


    << <i>A lot of 67's in the poll. I did not see 67 at all with this coin. I wavered between 64 and 65 and then went 65FB. The coin just has no wow to make 67.

    Ken >>



    I would surmise from past opinions of yours that you know a bit more than I do about Mercs, but (to you) there is question whether that coin was Gem or not? And I realize it's just a pic to judge from.
    imageDo not taunt Happy Fun Ball image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file