Home U.S. Coin Forum

Raw Coins...I'm Done withThem

This is a note that I sent to the editor of Coin World...I am very steamed about this!
Even after collecting coins for many years, I still prefer to trust my coins to the opinions of the professional graders. An incident occurred today which makes me think about how many collectors out there are happily paying their hard earned dollars for coins worth only a fraction of their investment. I recently sold four net graded slabs on eBay. They were scooped up by someone I assumed was a collector. A month after the sale, I noticed the same four coins being offered as raw coins for auction, by the same person who had purchased them in slabs from me. Furthermore, they were offered at premiums of 6 times or better the price that they had been purchased at. To make matters worse, there was no mention of the "filled rims, scratches, and cleaning" which had been listed on the original slabs .I compared photos of the coins (which were all Barber Halves)which I have to the photos on eBay. No doubt, same coins, same marks, same little dings and marks. Needless to say, when I contacted the seller, there was no reply. I did not expect one from such a low life. And by the way, the seller had a rating of 100% satisfaction. So to all of those self made experts who enjoy numismatics and continually scowl at the third party graders, I'd suggest you take a better look at your raw collection. Perhaps you might submit a few, just to be sure.

image
Irv Reichel
«1

Comments

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Out the seller.

    Russ, NCNE
  • I'm with Russ on this. We need to know who this person is.
  • I agree with Russ. Out this bad apple. I'm sure a few of us would like to quiz him on his auctions.



    Jerry
  • OuthaulOuthaul Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭✭✭
    HANGTHEB@STARD!
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,033 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Out the seller.

    Russ, NCNE >>


    I agree.

  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,815 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Didn't take much searching to figure it out on my own. You can cehck the feedback history to find the others.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    no real reason to get all worked up about this, it probably happens all the time. how is it different from any of the myriad collectors/dealers at this forum who might submit a coin several times until they get the hoped for money grade?? should they be under some ethical obligation to divulge that at the point of selling the coin?? what about collectors/dealers who submit Modern Commems and when the come back MS68/PR68DCAM quickly crack them out ansd sell them raw in the original packaging w/COA?? what about collectors/dealers who crack out coins and sell them raw?? i could go on, but what's the point??

    this kind of thing goes on all the time, more than we'd be willing to believe. this is just a case where the seller can be identified.
  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Guy's a bast'ad. But isn't this why slabs were created in the first place? Don't buy raw, or buy from someone with rock solid returns policy.
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • ARCOARCO Posts: 4,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Coin looks horrendous in the slab, and probably just as bad outside. Coins are worth what one is willing to pay, and if someone wants to pay big for a cleaned and ugly 96-O then I will step out of their way and let them do so. If you look at the other coins offered, they are all at high retail and beyond, problematic with no bidders on any of them.

    Why do people pay for $250,000 for a Ferrari when it is only an engine, tires and metallic shell? Not that this coin is even remotely like a Ferrari, but it is the concept of matching a buyer for a seller at a perceived value. I wouldn't have bought the holdered 96-O at the listed price and I would not buy it either raw and marked up 6 times the original price....but that is because I would rather spend my money on the ferrari! image

    Tyler
  • MoneyCollectorMoneyCollector Posts: 454 ✭✭✭
    This really is amazing though...at least to me! Has opened my eyes a bit more. Let the buyer beware!!

    Randy
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    I sent him this eMail:



    << <i>Why is it that you make no mention of the filed rims and cleaning as noted on the ANACS slab that you cracked the coin out of after you bought it in this auction? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11971&item=8330150875 >>



    It'll be interesting to see his response.

    Russ, NCNE
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i> how is it different from any of the myriad collectors/dealers at this forum who might submit a coin several times until they get the hoped for money grade??should they be under some ethical obligation to divulge that at the point of selling the coin?? what about collectors/dealers who submit Modern Commems and when the come back MS68/PR68DCAM quickly crack them out ansd sell them raw in the original packaging w/COA?? what about collectors/dealers who crack out coins and sell them raw?? >>

    It's different, because it appears, from what we have been told, that the seller is making a practice of buying problem coins, cracking them out of their holders and purposely NOT disclosing the problems.

    Additionally, opinions regarding numerical grades are subjective, whereas the determination as to whether a coin has a filed rim (or has been cleaned) is generally an objective one.

    It's also different, because we have real-life examples before our eyes, rather than just the abstract notion that such things can and do happen.
  • kiyotekiyote Posts: 5,611 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is an arguement against or for raw coins, depending on if you're selling or buying..
    "I'll split the atom! I am the fifth dimension! I am the eighth wonder of the world!" -Gef the talking mongoose.
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭
    Nothing new here. image

    It's eBay! Repeat, it's eBay!!! (Please note that the coin has not sold yet.)

    IMO the pic clearly shows that the coin has problems. It might have been nice if the seller mentioned them, but I don't think there is anything that requires him to do that! (other than a guilty conscience).

    Joe. Buyer beware. image
  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536


    << <i>It's different, because it appears, from what we have been told, that the seller is making a practice of buying problem coins, cracking them out of their holders and purposely NOT disclosing the problems. >>


    And crackout artists make a practice out of resubmitting liner coins until they make the undeserved jump to the higher level without disclosing the fact that the coin has been submitted ten times, is maxed, and now has a gift grade. Better give up on slabbed coins too.

    Actually, just learn to grade, examine the coins yourself, make your own decision about the coin and don't take anyone elses opinion about it as gospel.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Mike

    you seem to agree with my first point while Mark wants to be selective in his ethical choices. i'm sure our astute collegue has always informed a buyer of the lower grade a coin received, a coin Mark cherried and upgraded for profit. i mean, hey, according to his opinion that should be what's done, right??
  • 500Bay500Bay Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭
    If I'm looking for anything but bottom end coins - I prefer certified coins by a top tier company. While grading is and always will be subjective - they are usually good at detecting problem coins and fakes. The grading is not perfect, but gives a certain degree of security. This is all especially true when buying over the internet, without the benefit of seeing the coin in person.

    In summary: I'm done with raw coins also..........
    Finem Respice
  • Maybe I'm naive but isn't this an eBay/interent problem not a raw coin problem.


  • << <i>no real reason to get all worked up about this, it probably happens all the time. >>




    So does murder, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't get "worked up" about it!


    image
  • meos1meos1 Posts: 1,135
    Actually, Its not a problem with raw coins or ebay. Its a problem with people who do not do the research and then buy a coin without looking at it. While I do not posess all the skills in the world there is no substitution for a solid understanding of the series of interest, common practices in deception, etc. Mearly relying on the opinions of others get you only, the opinion of others. In this case a grader. You can not substitute education and experience for plastic.

    Dan
    I am just throwing cheese to the rats chewing on the chains of my sanity!

    First Place Winner of the 2005 Rampage design contest!
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Maybe I'm naive but isn't this an eBay/interent problem not a raw coin problem >>

    I think it's a bit of both.image



    << <i>And crackout artists make a practice out of resubmitting liner coins until they make the undeserved jump to the higher level without disclosing the fact that the coin has been submitted ten times, is maxed, and now has a gift grade. Better give up on slabbed coins too >>

    Condor101, one of the distinctions I had made (see at the bottom of this post) was that the seller intentionally hid information about things like rim filing and cleaning (which can be judged by a more objective standard) vs. differences in numerical grading opinions (which are usually far more subjective in nature).

    You, Keets and others are certainly free to disagree about drawing the line there, as opposed to disclosing any and all previous grading (or no-grade) information.



    << <i>Additionally, opinions regarding numerical grades are subjective, whereas the determination as to whether a coin has a filed rim (or has been cleaned) is generally an objective one. >>

  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Maybe I'm naive but isn't this an eBay/interent problem not a raw coin problem. >>


    The same thing goes on at coins shows with "real" dealers. There's nothing wrong with raw coins, but there is something wrong if you buy them without knowing what you're doing. And by the same token, you can get taken by overgraded certified coins, too.

    You know old saying about buying the book? It still applies!
  • From an outsiders perspective, I find the viewpoints on this fascinating.

    How many of you expect your mechanic to be honest? How about your doctor? Do you need a medical degree to make sure your doctor is not "ripping you off"?

    While I agree that the buyer should be wary, the coin industry is driving away people by building a perceived reputation for shady dealing and tricks like these. When I walk into a coin shop there are coins I simply will not consider buying because I believe that I will not get correct/clear information about the coin. In fact, I honestly feel in my gut (which is a big feeling let me tell you) that the unless I know enough about the coin to judge for myself the value, I will get "taken" or "ripped". I have advised friends to put coin dealers on the same level as used car salesmen. In fact I saved one friend by getting "ripped" by a dealer on a few mid-value coins the guy had absolutely lowballed (it was only a few hundred dollars, but it was a "rip" attempt).

    So, I have avoided spending thousands of dollars I might otherwise have spent.

    Don't be so casual and dismiss dishonesty. The dealers are only hurting themselves. I know they have driven me away from seriously playing with coins (I almost said investing, but it is a lousy investment and I just love dabbling in coins).

  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Interesting - after receiving emails from at least two forum members, the seller ended the listing for the 1896-O half dollar linked previously in this thread.

    This was his reply to an email which made note of the fact that he had been outted for cracking coins out of holders and failing to disclose known problems:

    <<I do not know if this is the same coin or not.It has been removed until it is known.Any problems I thought to be an issue should of been disclosed.If there are abnormal issues it will be disclosedif relisted.
    Thanks Arnie>>
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I do not know if this is the same coin or not. >>



    Yeah, right.

    Russ, NCNE
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Zulan - It's not only collectors that feel like you do, it's lay people as well.

    Last time my in-laws came for a visit, they mentioned they have a bunch of "silver dollars" they would like me to look at and tell them what they're worth. They said they've heard nothing but negatives about ALL the coin dealers in the city of Pittsburgh and would trust none of them.
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Hey Mark don't know if you remember the 74 IHC I showed you in and NCS holder, tagged for improper cleaning but you did comment to me that you would have most likely ok'd it. Would it be unethical to send it to PCGS to get slabbed?
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Hey Mark don't know if you remember the 74 IHC I showed you in and NCS holder, tagged for improper cleaning but you did comment to me that you would have most likely ok'd it. Would it be unethical to send it to PCGS to get slabbed? >>

    Mike, that would not be unethical in my opinion. I think I remember it, too. image
  • elwoodelwood Posts: 2,414
    What if this net graded coin had been cracked out and made it into an NGC or PCGS slab?
    Would it then be OK for the seller to mark it up 5X's and sell it as a problem free coin?
    Please visit my website prehistoricamerica.com www.visitiowa.org/pinecreekcabins
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I do not know if this is the same coin or not.... >>

    I guess he forgot about buying it and cracking it out to eliminate the evidence.
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm with keets on this one in that I believe folks should have substantial personal responsibility with their choices when they buy. This is always an opinion that gets me hammered on these boards, which I find truly amazing.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What if this net graded coin had been cracked out and made it into an NGC or PCGS slab?
    Would it then be OK for the seller to mark it up 5X's and sell it as a problem free coin?

    It happens all the time (right or wrong).

  • mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    The only raw coins I would even consider buying are in SEGS or green label PCI holders.image
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm with keets on this one in that I believe folks should have substantial personal responsibility with their choices when they buy. This is always an opinion that gets me hammered on these boards, which I find truly amazing. >>

    Saying people should spend their due diligence before buying and crusading against ripoff artists and shady dealers are not mutually exclusive.
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Raw coin + eBay = Caveat Emptor

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,912 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I really don’t have a problem with this at all. I assume ANACS originally slabbed the coins? Were they correct? Incorrect? Too harsh? Too liberal? Who knows! Things like scratches, dings, etc are fairly objective, just like grading standards. PCGS slabs tons of coins with scratches (and dings) for that matter. The question is, are the issues bad enough to mean a bodybag? PCGS acts as judge and jury on that one.

    It’s “buyer beware” folks, whether slabbed or not. Assume nothing when buying any coin, and you’ll do fine. Assume PCGS won’t slab a problem coin, and you’re looking for real trouble…

    Dave
    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • This is an interesting post: About E-Bay being responsible, my answer is this:image

    But I like how you "E-Bay police" on this forum monitor the fraudulant. Every bit helps the collectors in their purchases. But you can't save everyone. If someone doesn't wish to do their homework, or is looking for a big break, (like Barney a.k.a. offthehorseforgood), a P.T.Barnum seller will catch some off guard.

    My question is this, and I will say it over and over again. WHO IN THEIR SANE MIND WOULD BUY ANYTHING RAW THESE DAYS, THAT IS PRICED OVER $1000, AND OFF OF E-BAY NO LESS???

    The slabbing helps to legitimize/authenticate purchases. Closes the book on getting "ripped off". But, there are still those out there, (niave and making the crooks rich), who think they found a steal on E-bay and want the get-rich-quick coin.

    Too bad I have a conscience. I could be making a mint off of these P.T. Barnum suckers.

    The Accumulator - Dark Lloyd of the Sith

    image
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,427 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>no real reason to get all worked up about this, it probably happens all the time. how is it different from any of the myriad collectors/dealers at this forum who might submit a coin several times until they get the hoped for money grade?? should they be under some ethical obligation to divulge that at the point of selling the coin?? what about collectors/dealers who submit Modern Commems and when the come back MS68/PR68DCAM quickly crack them out ansd sell them raw in the original packaging w/COA?? what about collectors/dealers who crack out coins and sell them raw?? i could go on, but what's the point??

    this kind of thing goes on all the time, more than we'd be willing to believe. this is just a case where the seller can be identified. >>



    Keets quit being so realistic and straight forward. People do not want to hear this and will always pick your posts apart to suit their own agenda.

    Ken
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    Folks should do their homework before buying anything, but one should not EXPECT to be ripped off when buying an coin. Caveat Emptor should NOT have to be the continuous mode we have to work in to protect ourselves. Do we need to assume all people selling coins are out to get us? I'm not saying we should trust everyone, but do we have to trust no one? How do we educate ourselves if we are constantly being ripped off? Not all collectors have a trusted person who can show us all the ropes for everything.

    Tom
    Tom

  • Hey TOm:

    If we collectors chose not to trust ANYONE, wouldn't the prices soon go down, since no one was willing to buy? What a GREAT strategy!!!image
    The Accumulator - Dark Lloyd of the Sith

    image


  • << <i>but one should not EXPECT to be ripped off when buying an coin.
    Tom >>



    I politely disagree on this one. If it isn't slabbed, any coin should be looked at with a bit of skepticism. Sad, but true nowadays.image
    Everything I write is my opinion.

    Looking for alot of crap.
  • jomjom Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd have to agree with Keets also. Everyone should learn to evalute and appraise coins themselves. Period. For coins on eBay, regardless whether it's raw or not, make sure you have a true return policy. The only reason for this is to be able to VIEW the coin. Do not buy sight-unseen.

    The only way to protect yourself is knowledge.....

    jom
  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,912 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it isn't slabbed, any coin should be looked at with a bit of skepticism.

    Only half true. Slabbed or not, any coin should be looked at with a bit of skepticism

    Dave
    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • I think that having a general agreement that dishonesty (or at least deception) is rampant is a sad statement, and this perception IS harming the hobby and IS limiting the people entering it.
  • 500Bay500Bay Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭


    << <i> I think that having a general agreement that dishonesty (or at least deception) is rampant is a sad statement, and this perception IS harming the hobby and IS limiting the people entering it. >>



    image
    Finem Respice
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    Once again I am amazed that so many on this forum want to blame the victim, instead of the scammer. The fact that all this crap goes on in our hobby does not make it right. Yes, all collectors should educate themselves, but it is the scammer that is harming our hobby, not the uninformed collector. Bravo to the OP for making us aware of these unscrupulous activities. I hope Coin World publishes his letter.


  • << <i>I think that having a general agreement that dishonesty (or at least deception) is rampant is a sad statement, and this perception IS harming the hobby and IS limiting the people entering it. >>



    Would you prefer we stick our heads in the sand and lie to ourselves. Numismatics has become a business, all businesses have their fair share of scumbags. Ours is no exception. If anyone doesn't believe this let me know, I'll sell you some used cars.image
    Everything I write is my opinion.

    Looking for alot of crap.
  • Would you prefer we stick our heads in the sand and lie to ourselves.

    No, in fact the honesty is nice. It just surprises me that there is not more anger at the scammers, rather than a sense of resignation. As it stands now the general novice seems to be in for a rough ride.

    I think it is not unreasonable to expect honesty, but be wary of trickery. I think it IS unusual to expect trickery, or sometimes outright lies. I cannot think of a hobby that has survived such a stigma for very long. It would be sad to think that greed rather than a love of the coins/hobby was the primary driver for something I enjoy so much.

  • Thanks Fats. You hit the nail right on the head!
    Irv Reichel
  • BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Lloyd said WHO IN THEIR SANE MIND WOULD BUY ANYTHING RAW THESE DAYS, THAT IS PRICED OVER $1000,

    Ever look at a Stacks catalog?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file