Home U.S. Coin Forum

Cleaned coin in PCGS Holder...

I purchased this coin at a show about 2-1/2 years ago and found out for sure that it was cleaned (thanks to the experts here image). Couldn't PCGS have caught that this was improperly cleaned? Did it develope this horrible yellow- light brass color in the holder? Dosen't PCGS have a gurantee that would compensate me for the loss?

It angers me that the dealer who sold it to me didn't tell me it was cleaned (but I was a very stupid YN who trusted PCGS then). image

Here are some photos. The color is a tat darker on the last two:

image

image

image

Thanks for your help.
Ben
-Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA

Comments

  • OffMetalOffMetal Posts: 1,684
    .
    -Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    Yes, PCGS will guarantee the coin. If you do feel it has been cleaned and does not warrant it being in a PCGS PR-63 holder, send it in to PCGS. If PCGS agrees that it is not a true PCGS PR-63. they will make it right with you. You also might want to ask another dealer or compentent coin collector on their opinion too.

    Tom
    Tom

  • HeywoodHeywood Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭
    Do you know that the dealer you bought it from was the one who got it slabbed?


    A witty saying proves nothing- Voltaire (1694 - 1778)



    An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor

    does the truth become error because nobody will see it. -Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948)
  • OffMetalOffMetal Posts: 1,684




    << <i>Yes, PCGS will guarantee the coin. If you do feel it has been cleaned and does not warrant it being in a PCGS PR-63 holder, send it in to PCGS. If PCGS agrees that it is not a true PCGS PR-63. they will make it right with you. You also might want to ask another dealer or compentent coin collector on their opinion too. >>



    I've showed the coin to a couple dealers and they say it was cleaned, along with numerous board members.



    << <i>Do you know that the dealer you bought it from was the one who got it slabbed? >>



    No, I do not think that he got it slabbed himself.


    Thanks
    Ben
    -Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • Dipped would be more accurate just from looking at the pics. No abrasive cleaning showing to my view. One can dip a nickel in certain types of solutions and it will stay ok for a few months, then turn ugly like your proof looks. Im sure PCGS would make it good. But I would not blame them for not catching the problem at first, because it cannot be seen at first. JMHO.
    In an insane society, a sane person will appear to be insane.
  • MercMerc Posts: 1,646 ✭✭
    I collect proof V-nickels and have seen this kind of toning. Some have a streaky ugly yellow toning. This is a natural toning and is not caused by cleaning. Cleaning proofs usually results in hairlines in the fields. A PF63 is a lower grade and can have numerous light hairlines in the fields. The PF63 grade may also be correct due to the low eye appeal and low luster due to the toning.
    Looking for a coin club in Maryland? Try:
    FrederickCoinClub
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    The PCGS grade guarantee exists for the same reason there are erasers on pencils.

    Fortunately, unlike most other services, they will take care of it (as would NGC)
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • I agree with merc that this could be natural.
  • The guarantee is very subjective. Just because a coin has been cleaned doesn't mean that PCGS will correct the mistake. I have an Eliasberg coin that has been scrubbed. PCGS said that grade was accurate.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,595 ✭✭✭✭✭
    One thing you learn about most slabbed pre 1936 Proofs in PR-63 or lower. They are usually ugly. I’ve had a couple of nice looking PCGS graded PR-63s, but I had to look hard for them. And I’ve got a PCGS PR-63 Barber quarter in my collection that I really like mainly because it has never been dipped. Its sin is that there is a lint mark in the right obverse field.

    Did coin look like this when you buy it? If so you must have some motivation other than esthetics. Did you buy the coin cheap sight unseen? If you did welcome to Blue Sheet pricing. There is a reason why Blue Sheet prices are lower than Gray Sheet prices.

    I’ll agree with you that it’s a disappointing coin, but from a technical grade it probably rates the PR-63. As such I don’t think that PCGS will feel than an adjustment is in order.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Dog97Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭
    It was prolly nice & shiny when it was first holdered. Now it does look kinda sorta maybe coulda possibly like a bad dip job. I say that because of the splotchyness similiar to the retone left by dip residue.
    Coulda been bad storage and it looked that way before it was slabbed.
    I don't actually see "cleaned" from your picts.
    Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    OffMetal, the coin looks as if it might have retoned after a dipping (as opposed to an abrasive cleaning).

    Neither the selling dealer (who might not have dipped it himself) nor PCGS (who probably had insufficient reason to refuse to grade the coin) need to be blamed.

    Send it to PCGS under their guarantee and ask thet they take the coin off your hands at a fair price.
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,625 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sorry, from the image, it looks like the standard, dead, ugly toned PF 3 Liberty Nickel. More often than not, they have this lack of eye appeal in PF or MS 63. Bill Jones knows of what he speaks.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,275 ✭✭✭
    "...and found out for sure that it was cleaned ...."

    How, because people on this site saw scans of it?
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • magikbillymagikbilly Posts: 6,780
    That, to me, is a normal "dead" Pr63 V 5C. Streaks and all. Perhaps retoned after a dip but who could say from these pics. I don't really see a problem. Better pictures would be good - it is perhaps not that ugly.

    Billy
  • I don't understand this logic contained in some of the posts in this thread:

    1. The coin may not have been cleaned but may have been dipped.

    2. Even though other dealers and some members of this board have concluded that the coin has been cleaned (viewed the coin in person, no doubt), let's assume that it's been dipped (and not in addition to a cleaning) because the picture leads me to conclude that they are wrong.

    3. From that, PCGS doesn't owe you anything.

    Duh...
  • magikbillymagikbilly Posts: 6,780


    << <i>I don't understand this logic contained in some of the posts in this thread:

    The coin may not have been cleaned but may have been dipped.

    2. Even though other dealers and some members of this board have concluded that the coin has been cleaned (viewed the coin in person, no doubt), let's assume that it's been dipped (and not in addition to a cleaning) because the picture leads me to conclude that they are wrong.

    3. From that, PCGS doesn't owe you anything.

    Duh... >>



    You seem to know the difference between the two from your own post. Anyway, it is generally understood to be abrasive (a "cleaning" that is). I did not see where board members actually said they saw it in hand. Perhaps I missed it.

    Billy

  • "I've showed the coin to a couple dealers and they say it was cleaned, along with numerous board members."

    No doubt that the dealers saw the coin in hand. I could careless about the board members.
  • OffMetalOffMetal Posts: 1,684
    My apologies, I mixed up "dipped" with "cleaned"


    Thanks for the help, I appreciate it.

    Ben
    -Ben T. * Collector of Errors! * Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • Well that changes everything.
  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,054 ✭✭✭
    Time for a grade review!

    TorinoCobra71

    image
  • magikbillymagikbilly Posts: 6,780


    << <i>"I've showed the coin to a couple dealers and they say it was cleaned, along with numerous board members."

    No doubt that the dealers saw the coin in hand. I could careless about the board members. >>



    In this context dealers could be saying anything for any reason - including trying to buy the coin. I would be more inclined to trust any of several respected Board Members opinions over the dealers.

    Billy
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I don't understand this logic contained in some of the posts in this thread:

    The coin may not have been cleaned but may have been dipped
    >>

    Some people use the words "cleaned" and "dipped" interchangeably. However, while dipping is a form of cleaning, it does not affect a coin in the same way. To many, dipping is much more acceptable (or, if you prefer, less unacceptable) than cleaning is.

    In the world of coin grading (or no-grades) "cleaned" has a different connotation than "dipped", because the grading companies will "no-grade" coins which have been too harshly cleaned and state "cleaning" as the reason for the no-grade.

    Like it or not, the major grading companies holder huge numbers of "dipped" coins, as well as some coins which have been cleaned (as opposed to dipped).

    The coins which have been "cleaned" are usually penalized for such in the form of lower grades than they would have otherwise received.

    Dipped coins, on the other hand, don't necessarily receive grading penalties. That is because dipped coins, as opposed to those which have been harshly cleaned, often look better (rather than worse) afterwards.

  • If someone cleaned that coin they did a horrible job doing so, i don't think it was cleaned, the toning is the way it should be imo but what do i know? lol

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file