Looks like either a PCGS 2 or PCGS 2.5 The label appears to have a perferated border So it would have to be before PCGS 3.5 (All varieties 3.5 and later use die cut labels with smooth edges.) It has a barcode so it isn't PCGS 1, and it doesn't have the Doilie pattern so it isn't PCGS 3. I lean toward PCGS 2 because I don't see a PCGS at the top center of the label but it could be missing due to the cropping of the picture. If it is there, then it is a PCGS 2.5 Either way it dates to late 1989.
merc beat me to the punch. most of the D/D's are common, can you tell which it is?? still a nice blazer. i remember finding XF/AU Buffalo's in change during my early collecting in 1964-5. i often wondered if they purged the vaults when they cleaned out all the Morgans for GSA Holiday.
Geesh, you friggin' realists know how to take the fun out of thread. Yeah, the D/D has several varieties and is not a great rarity. Yeah, the '38-Ds tend to come with nice luster. Happy holidays to you, as well ...
I was just threatened with life and limb if I crack it ... from a PMer who states it is a PCGS 2 slab from 1989 and becoming darn scarce ... Thanks for the comments!
Comments
42/92
<< <i> Unattributed D/D to boot >>
YOU SUCK!
Too bad it isn't a D/S and worth even more money.
Cameron Kiefer
FrederickCoinClub
al h.
<< <i>Is it just me, or is that luster blazing? Most Buffs I see don't look like that. >>
The 1938-D is one that frequently comes with outstanding luster.
Russ, NCNE
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>The 1938-D is one that frequently comes with outstanding luster. >>
<< <i>Yeah, the '38-Ds tend to come with nice luster. >>
Interesting. I learn stuff here all the time.
Please check out my eBay auctions!
My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)