Options
Are These Kennedy's Worth Submitting?
LeeG
Posts: 12,162 ✭




I also picked up three 64's for $3 each:







Thanks for your comments, positive or negative! Lee
0
Comments
The others no.
The last 64 might go CAM but it is hard to tell from the pics posted.
Russ would be the expert in this arena.
TPN
68 is a DCAM but has alot of milk spots so thst will knock it down a bit
the others I would not bother with on the last 64 realy can't tell from the pic
but I am betting on hairlines might go Cam
MHO
Paul
From the photos I dont think the 68 has a shot at DCAM, CAM maybe but it depends on the reverse I cant tell from the photo. From your photos not the ebay sellers I would say 67 I say this due to the reverse. I cant see the cam. Other wise nice Kennedy have you checked it for a possible variety?
Sleep well tonight for the 82nd Airborne Division is on point for the nation.
AIRBORNE!
42/92
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>The 1964's no.
Cameron Kiefer >>
42/92
<< <i>George is correct, unless you can hit a high grade DCAM your pissing your cash away. >>
Correct! And, it's getting to the point with the pops on some coins where even a 69 DCAM/UCAM is even a wash!
I see nothing in the group worth submitting.
<< <i>Still trying to get a feel for different sellers and photo's they use to try and sell a coin. I picked up this 68-S for $9.99. >>
Sorry, but you probably overpaid. I know which seller you got it from. It will not be nearly as strong in hand, and may very well be hairlined to death.
Russ, NCNE
I see that you're from Odenton, MD. You should come up to Mike Dixon's next show in Frederick in late January and meet us folks from the forum!
Ken