Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Three nice early date Kennedy Half Dollars (2 business strikes, one proof).

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
image

image

image

The 1968-D is a lock MS66. Not only does it make the grade on a technical basis, it has "the look" that makes PCGS graders get all hot.

The 1969-D is a technical MS66, but may grade only MS65 because it doesn't have "the look." Still a very nice example of a tougher year.

The 1970 proof is a PR68DCAM that looks better than that. It has a hairline above the motto that isn't showing up in the image.

Russ, NCNE

Comments

  • Options
    So you do beat MadMarty smoetimes!! image

    I like all three of them. You guys might be converting me. image
  • Options
    MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
    Very nice Russ, you have so much and I have so little...
    It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>So you do beat MadMarty smoetimes!! >>



    Every now and then he leaves me a few crumbs.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    Modern Crap !
    image
  • Options
    LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like that kind of crap. Modern has a place in the hobby.
    image
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    image

    I was telling Marty the other day, anaybody can make proofs. Real men make business strikes. image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    Russ - Very nice - the Kennedy proof DCAM has great eye appeal and your pics are great!! Do they make the coin look better than in-hand? Same? Slightly worse?

    I can't get any of my pics of proofs to be as nice as the coin looks in-hand. Great coins!

    Mike
    Coppernicus

    Lincoln Wheats (1909 - 1958) Basic Set - Always Interested in Upgrading!
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Do they make the coin look better than in-hand? Same? Slightly worse? >>



    I comes very close from a contrast standpoint, but looks slightly worse than in-hand because an image can't give you that cool twirling under the light brilliance reflecting off the mirrors.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That 68D is sweet. How the heck can you get your pics so darn mouth watering Russ?
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • Options


    << <i>"the look" that makes PCGS graders get all hot. >>



    I honestly don't think PCGS graders get hot over any Kennedies they get to grade.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I honestly don't think PCGS graders get hot over any Kennedies they get to grade.

    Cameron Kiefer >>



    Yes they do, doofus.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    Ask David Hall. I'm telling you, they don't.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Ask David Hall. I'm telling you, they don't.

    Cameron Kiefer >>



    Just the other day I was chatting with them and they said they were glad to see some nice Kennedys because they were sick of seeing the junk that Kiefer kid kept sending them.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    You mean they were tired of the madmarty weiner dollarsimage I haven't submitted to PCGS in over a year.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • Options
    Nice coins, is it the far cheek luster breaks that keep the 68-D form 7? The 69-D is very nice, seems a little weak on the reverse but nicer than any I have.

  • Options
    image
    Stacy

    Sleep well tonight for the 82nd Airborne Division is on point for the nation.
    AIRBORNE!
  • Options
    The '68 and '69 look fabulous. You can keep the proof...proofs aren't real coins (although '70 was a very good year image )
  • Options
    LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162
    image "Sweet" Pick Up!!! You "Da Bomb"!!! It's a very high mountain to climb for us new Kennedy Half Collectors to reach the pinnacle that you have set. But, that just makes it all the sweeter when we do!!!!!!!!!!, and we will!!!!!!! Lee
  • Options
    Nice clean, satiny fields on that '68! I recently picked up a BU roll of '64 Kennedy's and although I haven't studied them all I'm pretty certain nothing that nice is lurking inside. The coin on the top had a couple nice fingerprints on it. image Well cherrypicked!
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>is it the far cheek luster breaks that keep the 68-D form 7? >>



    That, and if you look carefully at the reverse, you'll see a little ding at the top of the tail feathers below the shield.

    BTW, for those not familiar with these, both pieces have amazingly clean shields for these years.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    Damn! When I saw "early date" in the title, I thought these Kennedy halves were going to be from the 1800's. image
    J.C.
    *******************************************************************************

    imageimageSee ya on the other side, Dudes. image
  • Options
    Dog,

    Early would be Joe Kennedy halfs !
    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file