Home U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • I can't see it.
    Young Numismatist that collects: Morgan Dollars, SAE, Proof Sets, and Liberty Nickels.
    I also love to go through rolls to find coins.
    BST
    image
    MySlabbedCoins
  • now you can.
    littlejohn
    and i want get mad!!
  • here ya go:


    image
    This is a very dumb ass thread. - Laura Sperber - Tuesday January 09, 2007 11:16 AM image

    Hell, I don't need to exercise.....I get enough just pushing my luck.
  • oh well.....I tried to help....just not enough java yet.
    This is a very dumb ass thread. - Laura Sperber - Tuesday January 09, 2007 11:16 AM image

    Hell, I don't need to exercise.....I get enough just pushing my luck.
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    To me, easily MS-65, shot MS-66.

    Tom
    Tom

  • AU58
    Young Numismatist that collects: Morgan Dollars, SAE, Proof Sets, and Liberty Nickels.
    I also love to go through rolls to find coins.
    BST
    image
    MySlabbedCoins
  • David lawerence coin and not looking at their website I'd grade it MS-64.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Here is yet another excellent example of why it is often nearly impossible to grade accurately from images.

    There is no way for us to tell, among other things, (without being able to tilt and rotate this coin under good lighting) how severe the abrasions are behind Liberty's head, in front of her face and under the eagle's wings.

    If the imperfections are extremely minor/barely discernible without magnification, the coin might be a 65 (with a slight possibility of a higher grade). However, if they are readily apparent to the naked eye, the coin could grade as low as MS62 or thereabouts. I don't think this piece has wear/rub on the high points, so it appears to be mint state, but even that is often difficult to tell from images.

    Edited to add: If I had to guess, I'd say this one is an MS63.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    from the pic, IMO it has the look of an MS62-64 coin, too nice and lusterous for a lower grade,
    too many and ill-placed marks for a higher one.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • After my first look I guessed 63. This is because it doesn't look as nice as my 64. The when I read CoinGuy1's reply I felt pretty good about my guess. image
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I'd go 65 on it.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • mhammermanmhammerman Posts: 3,769 ✭✭✭
    4
  • Nice coin, great luster So I would grade it an MS64. Can't give it a 65 because of the cheeks/face hits and the fields are not clean enough.

  • hi everyone
    Keeping guessing, and than tonight I will tell you what pcgs grade it at. I just send it back, today to be regarded at pcgs. really only a few marks show without magnification. It is blow up a lot.
    littlejohn
  • msch1manmsch1man Posts: 809 ✭✭✭✭
    From the pic here in this post, I'd guess a high-end MS-64 to low-end MS-65. Then I cheated and looked it up at David Lawrence and if I was looking at the right coin (ID#102537)...that picture and the picture here in this post look very different. Judging by that picture, I'd have guessed it was a high-end MS-62 to low-end MS-63. Just my opinion.
  • (From the pic here in this post, I'd guess a high-end MS-64 to low-end MS-65. Then I cheated and looked it up at David Lawrence and if I was looking at the right coin (ID#102537)...that picture and the picture here in this post look very different. Judging by that picture, I'd have guessed it was a high-end MS-62 to low-end MS-63. Just my opinion. )
    your right it came from at David Lawrence ,but you are looking at the wroung coin,been gone from daivd for 2 to 3 mo. now.
    littlejohn
  • MS-63 all day image
  • RBB617RBB617 Posts: 498 ✭✭
    Just from the photos and my experience with certified gold at PCGS, this appears to be a 64. The strike looks pretty good, as does the luster. I don't see any real wear, just a dark spot and a few hits. The hits may be magnified due to the size of the pictures, but on a $10 gold, I'd bet that they are still discernable in hand. It is a nice looking coin.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    something's wrong w/ that coin. i guess ms-62

    K S
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    oops, now the entire digi-pic popped up, & i can see what's wrong. i changed my mind - ms-61

    K S
  • (oops, now the entire digi-pic popped up, & i can see what's wrong. i changed my mind - ms-61

    K S )


    hi
    what do you see that wrong.??
    littlejohn
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    corrosion has been removed from this coin, mostly stars 6-8, but particularly at star 7. whoever did it did a crappy job too, damaging the denticles above s7. really, it should get a body-bag.

    K S
  • Who said 63?? Man, you're harsh. I say strong 65 without a doubt, with a good chance at a 66.
    image
    image
  • hi
    i hope your right sliderider,it will be back in about 2 week.was allready in a pcgs slab.i will show everone tonight what grade it is now..!!
    littlejohn
  • image

    hi here is the grade for that coin.
    littlejohn
  • hi here is the grade for that coin.
    littlejohn
  • clw54clw54 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭
    MS64
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    i would recommend you pass on this coin.

    K S

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file