What do y'all think of the WLH?

Cladiator · February 26, 2004 8:18AM

The coin looks just like the pics.

JrGMan2004 · February 26, 2004 8:23AM

Puuurty!

Not bad Cladiator! The Emperor gives you a Thumbs Up On this one...!

hookedoncoins · February 26, 2004 8:25AM

I think the toning is kind of questionable (mainly considering I have never seen a natural one that looks like this), but it looks like a pretty decent half.

JxnBoy · February 26, 2004 8:29AM

Well, overall, a nice obverse strike. Interesting doubling on the date. Looks pretty weak on the obverse, which seems odd cause the obverse is so crisp. I guess the die marriage did it.

Nicely toned, but....it's not looking so NT on the reverse as it's the same color all over. NT doesn't usually look this way. Toning around the date on the obverse looks a bit suspect too. I dunno. Sorry. You asked for an opinion, and it's my honest one.

Cladiator · February 26, 2004 2:36PM

ttt

Ok I saw what the day shift had to say so lets see what the night shift says.

Cam40 · February 26, 2004 8:38PM

well,this morning it looks to me like a gold coin.

was it treated you think?

does it weigh the same as a non-goldtoned WL?

maybe it was dipped in a gold-ladened jewelluster dip?
if so, the weigh differential might be so miniscule it may not be noticable.....

dorkkarl · February 26, 2004 9:50PM

pass

K S

mrfred · February 26, 2004 10:49PM

What's that wear on the '1' in the date? Is that normal?

Dog97 · February 26, 2004 11:03PM

I don't know if this is a show off newp thread or ask advice thread and might hurt your feelings but anyway it looks circulated & AT to me.

What do y'all think of the WLH?

Comments

Leave a Comment