The 71-D's come pretty nice. Looks like a decent strike, and the fields on the obverse are quite clean. There are a few microticks on the jaw, and one on the right middle shield. I can't tell from the pic if the bottom of the neck is clean, but it appears so. I'm unsure of the disturbance traveling right toward the edge from the designer's initials, but it is not distracting. Luster is subdued, and average. The breaks in luster on either side of the eagle ARE distracting. For that reason, I max the coin at a 5, even though based on marks, it's a nicer coin. If the blotchiness developed after it was holdered, the coin is a high 66. Otherwise, it's a 5 to me. BTW - no scuff at the top of the shield, and that's pretty unusual.
Don
Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
In terms of the toning, this picture totally flatters the coin. It doesn't really look anything like this. The lavender toning is very, very subtle, and you just about have to stand on your head and squint your eyes to even see it.
It's a nice looking coin, though, and is in a 65 holder.
Comments
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
Cameron Kiefer
Jade Rare Coin eBay Listings
Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
Don
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
It's a nice looking coin, though, and is in a 65 holder.