Prices of PCGS Slabbed Coins vs. the Competition

I was just wondering if anyone thinks that it is wise to purchase non-PCGS slabs to save a substantial amount of money. I, like most people, prefer PCGS, but is the price premium worth it? As an example, I just purchased the key date 1993 silver eagle in an NGC MS69 holder for a mere $45. The same coin in the same grade in a PCGS slab sells for around $110. My NGC graded coin looks just as good or better than the same one in a PCGS slab, and I spent less than half as much. This is probably an extreme example, but with other coin series, there is still a substantial price difference.
Author of MrKelso's official cheat thread words of wisdom on 5/30/04. 


Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.



Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
0
Comments
It seem to me that,for the fee,if it will cross,go for it.I would,good luck.
Buying non PCGS coins is just throwing your money away.
..... but keep this really quiet shuuuuuuu
dont bring up fbl Frankies
islemangu@yahoo.com
See Current Sales on Etsy
https://www.etsy.com/shop/Islemangu?ref=shop_profile&listing_id=4331147333
I can think of a dozen reasons not to have high capacity magazines, but it's the reasons I haven't thought about that I need them.
<< <i>No. Only buy PCGS coins. They are the only ones that have value. If a coin were as good as the others say it is then it would be in a PCGS slab.
Buying non PCGS coins is just throwing your money away. >>
pleeeeeeeease, buy the coin, not the holder!!!
As far as key-dates, first buy the coin for its merits.
But when it comes time to sell, usually a PCGS graded coin will bring stronger money.
jim
<< <i>My NGC graded coin looks just as good or better than the same one in a PCGS slab, and I spent less than half as much. >>
I would say that makes you a smart shopper.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>PCGS is currently the market favorite. That can change. Remember that for a few years in the late 1980's NGC was the market favorite. ANACS seems to be making a major push to gain ground on PCGS and NGC. The other services seem to be going in the opposite direction by catering to large on-line auction sellers. >>
Your kidding....right?
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
<< <i>No. Only buy PCGS coins. They are the only ones that have value. If a coin were as good as the others say it is then it would be in a PCGS slab.
Buying non PCGS coins is just throwing your money away. >>
Please, if you are going to post advice, please make it constructive.
First POTD 9/19/05!!
It's great to say buy the coin and not the holder, but the market pays for the holder as well as the coin. If you are buying a lesser holder, make sure you are paying the correct lessor price.
Greg
As for everything else, smart people buy the coin, not the holder. I’ve sold PCGS coins to dealers at premium prices and I’ve sold NGC coins at premium prices. I’ve seen coins in both holders for which I would not have paid Blue Sheet “bid.”
Buying ONLY one brand because you think it is “best”, “always right” and “always worth a premium” is a spurious approach to buying coins. It’s a good way to over pay and perhaps get burned in the long run.
If you are planning on crossing, then selling, you'd best plan on 3 months turn around time for PCGS economy service. Or---- you could skip the wait and the fees and just buy the coin in a PCGS holder to start with
My Auctions
Buy the coin!
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
Whether of not PCGS coins are better than the competition will be argued endlessly. But few people can argue that collectors are willing to pay more for PCGS coins. If you buy a coin housed in a less expensive slab, you'll get less money when it comes time to sell.
The best wisdom of all is to learn (and learn well) how to grade coins. You may find that PCGS coins are better graded than the competition (or not). Either way, you'll buy the coin that makes you happiest and you just might find a great deal in end.
<< <i>You have to look at each coin, but IMO generally, a coin in a NGC holder is just as nice as the PCGS Holder. >>
If that were true, PCGS would not command more money! I have a problem with the word GENERALLY, the more appropriate word would be SOMETIMES!
It's obvious from the advice you've given that you are not very knowlegable about coin collecting.
To say that no coin has value if not in a PCGS slab. Give Me A Break!!!
I sold a 1797 Half in an NGC slab for $50,000.00 a year ago. I would say that coin had considerable value. It recently sold for $75,000.00. It actually increased in value while in an NGC slab. Imagine that.
Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
<< <i>NGC also shot itself in the foot by assigning some “injudicious” grades to many modern coins early in the game (circa 2000). >>
Bill,
The irony of the current market in moderns is that PCGS did EXACTLY the same thing. Anybody who has looked at enough PR70DCAMs graded from that era will tell you that PCGS was pumping them out based on what the competition was doing, not on the merits of the coins. Somehow, though, the market has not punished them for that debacle as it has NGC.
Russ, NCNE
Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
I can think of a dozen reasons not to have high capacity magazines, but it's the reasons I haven't thought about that I need them.
NGC, God bless them, allowed (and is still doing so) the PR70 error to also poison the MS70 Market. NGC is a bit slower on the draw also to correct their mistakes, generally agreeing upon a second evaluation the coins meets the criteria for the grade.
peacockcoins
<< <i>That would be the same brainwashed mind as those who believe GM is the only auto company who can build a good car, that their political party can do no wrong, or that the NY Yankees are the greatest baseball team in the world. >>
They aren't, but they're sure as hell better than the Mariners.
Russ, NCNE
Buying ONLY one brand because you think it is “best”, “always right” and “always worth a premium” is a spurious approach to buying coins. It’s a good way to over pay and perhaps get burned in the long run. >>
Good point Bill!
<< <i>I wonder how much that 1797 would have went for in a PCGS slab? >>
Excellent point "Wallstreetman"!!!!
Bill,
The irony of the current market in moderns is that PCGS did EXACTLY the same thing. Anybody who has looked at enough PR70DCAMs graded from that era will tell you that PCGS was pumping them out based on what the competition was doing, not on the merits of the coins. Somehow, though, the market has not punished them for that debacle as it has NGC.
Russ, NCNE >>
Maybe because there are more NGC 70s! Doesnt take a Rocket Scientist to figure that one out!
<< <i>I wonder how much that 1797 would have went for in a PCGS slab? >>
It probably couldn't make it into a PCGS slab because of some problem. That is why it was in a NGC slab.
We all know that PCGS coins are worth the most so if it is in a different slab there is a reason for that.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Maybe because there are more NGC 70s! Doesnt take a Rocket Scientist to figure that one out! >>
WSM,
Really? Let's do a little comparison in Kennedy Halves for PR70:
1978-S
PCGS - 58
NGC - 0
1979-S Ty1
PCGS - 66
NGC - 6
1979-S Ty2
PCGS - 39
NGC - 0
1980-S
PCGS - 51
NGC - 4
1981-S Ty1
PCGS - 63
NGC - 0
1981-S Ty2
PCGS - 24
NGC - 0
1982-S
PCGS - 70
NGC - 2
1983-S
PCGS - 128
NGC - 2
1984-S
PCGS - 66
NGC - 0
1985-S
PCGS - 54
NGC - 1
I could go on and on, but I'm tired of typing. Oh, and my apologies for confusing you with facts.
Russ, NCNE
1. Yes there are times that a NGC coin is every bit as nice as a PCGS coin and at a lower price.
2. By and large, PCGS adheres to a tighter set of standards.Perhaps 1/2 to l point tighter then NGC.
3. Generally the NGC * coins have a better chance of crossing to PCGS in grade.
4. PR coins by NGC sometimes have small hairlines in the high grades that
will not cross in grade to PCGS.
5. Does PCGS have overgraded coins, yes they do. These exist, but to a lesser overall extent
then other third party grading service.
6.My personal preference is to have my coins in PCGS Holders. Why? Because it makes
me feel more confident about my selection of a coin. Does that make sense? Who knows
thats just the way I feel about it.
7. If you dont agree, thats OK, its just my opinion.
Camelot
The 97 Half would have been the same price in either holder, because it was the same coin. I only deal with people that actually know how to grade coins and who buy coins, not holders. I could have gotten the same price if it was raw.
We're talking true American Classics here. Not modern day hyped mumbo jumbo registry set stuff.
MS70s will have a BIG impact on the PR70 Market of XYZ grading company! BTW, there is still more PR70s in NGC in general!
<< <i>Russ, you really need to get out of this Kennedy rut your in and expand your horizons! >>
WSM,
As I'm typing this, I'm asking myself why I bother. But, the thought crosses my mind that while you will continue to blindly spoon up any pablum that PCGS plops on to your plate, there may be others around who mistakenly assume that your drivel is the be all and end all of grading. So..
You will find exactly the same thing for PR70 in every modern series. PCGS has graded many, many more than NGC. That is a fact.
Russ, NCNE
As per other thread right now, I have to disagree....
To say that there is an overarching absolute grading bias based soley on the plastic is purely false. Furthermore, it shows a lack of experience with the real market and a lack of grading ability.
Gloves on... but lets keep it clean. Again, not meant as a flame, hopefully taken as solid advice instead.
John
siliconvalleycoins.com
<< <i> What do you think is easier to make, a PR70 or a MS70?
Are you going to answer my question?
<< <i>Hey WSM and FOM, who really gives a rats ass! >>
You do! MR. PCGS 66FBL
<< <i>
<< <i>Hey WSM and FOM, who really gives a rats ass! >>
You do! MR. PCGS 66FBL >>
What's a PCGS66FBL