It's an ANACS holder, graded MS62RB. It's a Heritage image, so we can reasonably assume more red than is showing. Do you guys think it's accurately graded? Strike look good? Thanks.
Yes, it is accurately graded and a nice coin. Russ: Did you check the date for repunching in Kevin Flynn's book "Getting your two cents worth" and in the Cherrypicker's Guide?
It seems mighty clean for only a MS62. I wonder if the color is original and untampered with. ANACS sometimes lowers the grade for questionable color coins rather than net grading them. Maybe the color is fine and the luster is a bit on the shy side.
Look's nice Russ but I would suspect hairlines in a grade of 62 though as I do in most coins graded 62 if I can't view them in person. Also I see a few area's that look green- probably toning but could be something bad such as verdigris or PVC. mike
<< <i>It seems mighty clean for only a MS62. I wonder if the color is original and untampered with. ANACS sometimes lowers the grade for questionable color coins rather than net grading them. Maybe the color is fine and the luster is a bit on the shy side. >>
Find out the serial number on the holder. If it is of recent vintage it is probably original. ANACS has been very picky about retoned copper recently. Why do you want an MS62? Not a very desirable grade in terms of resale.
Hopefully more red than the image shows for the RB designation. The leaves to the left and right of the shield look "soft", also the bow on the reverse, as well as the reverse leaves. If the luster is good, it's probably a good coin. If the luster is muted, accompanied with the "softish" details, I could see the coin ending up in an au/58 holder. I like the coin (no spots or major problems seen in the scan), to own it, it would depend on what the price was. 62's can be funny grades.
I think that the color has been "enhanced" to bring up the red that you see. Still that sort of thing is to be expected for an MS-62 or even an MS-63. For less than $100, I can't see a problem here.
As for the sharpness, it's been my experience that many if not all 1870 Two Cent pieces are weakly struck. When I was collecting a set of Two Cent pieces in EF back in the late 1970s ** the 1870 that I found for my set was weakly struck. It would have taken very little wear for that coin to have gone from EF-40 to Fine-12 or VG-10. The relief on the devices was really low.
**NOTE back in the late 1970s inflation was ruining the economy and people were buying "things." The coin market was going nuts, and many collectors were being priced out of the market. That's why I was collecting Two Cent pieces in EF. "Real" collectors never want to go back to a time like that again!
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
I would go with some of the other comments (based solely on the picture)...it seems streaky and splotchy to me. The pic 'may' be a little out of focus (or over compressed) and that might be causing the strike to look worse than it is but it is hard to tell for sure.
It doesn't do much for me just from the picture but ou seem to know a lot about Heritage's photos so you may get a nicer coin than what I see on my monitorn.
Time sure flies when you don't know what you are doing...
Comments
Russ:
Did you check the date for repunching in Kevin Flynn's book "Getting your two cents worth" and in the Cherrypicker's Guide?
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
I don't have the coin, so I can't check anything on it. It's one I'm thinking about going after.
Russ, NCNE
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Sorry I just do not like it for some reason.
and thats a good thing russ
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
But it's bound to look better than that picture.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
Pretty similar to the one above.
Luckily for me, we have a very nice forum member who's going to check it out personally for me in Long Beach. Thanks Mark (mdwoods)!
Russ, NCNE
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
I dont think you will like it based on the scan. (Your coin is much nicer.)
I have about the best monitor availble for viewing coins and the Heritage photo's show the coin to be streaky and the detail is a tad mushy.
<< <i>It seems mighty clean for only a MS62. I wonder if the color is original and untampered with. ANACS sometimes lowers the grade for questionable color coins rather than net grading them. Maybe the color is fine and the luster is a bit on the shy side. >>
Find out the serial number on the holder. If it is of recent vintage it is probably original. ANACS has been very picky about retoned copper recently. Why do you want an MS62? Not a very desirable grade in terms of resale.
I like the coin (no spots or major problems seen in the scan), to own it, it would depend on what the price was. 62's can be funny grades.
LSCC#1864
Ebay Stuff
As for the sharpness, it's been my experience that many if not all 1870 Two Cent pieces are weakly struck. When I was collecting a set of Two Cent pieces in EF back in the late 1970s ** the 1870 that I found for my set was weakly struck. It would have taken very little wear for that coin to have gone from EF-40 to Fine-12 or VG-10. The relief on the devices was really low.
**NOTE back in the late 1970s inflation was ruining the economy and people were buying "things." The coin market was going nuts, and many collectors were being priced out of the market. That's why I was collecting Two Cent pieces in EF. "Real" collectors never want to go back to a time like that again!
It doesn't do much for me just from the picture but ou seem to know a lot about Heritage's photos so you may get a nicer coin than what I see on my monitorn.
CoinPeople.com || CoinWiki.com || NumisLinks.com
K S