[GTG]: 1927 Saint-Gaudens Gold Double Eagle *GRADE REVEALED*

Options
P0CKETCHANGE
P0CKETCHANGE Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited September 8, 2026 8:14AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Update: grade revealed in a comment

Common date double eagle in a PCGS holder.



Comments

  • FlyingAl
    FlyingAl Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS66. Lovely!

    Coin Photography

  • logger7
    logger7 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 7, 2026 12:02PM
    Options

    Probably MS64 cac. This date is about the best for aesthetic appeal of the series. I read the sun has to be clear and unhit for a real gem.

  • Walkerguy21D
    Walkerguy21D Posts: 12,164 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I’ll go 65, thinking the mark on the sun may have held it back, and yes it’s a lovely coin!

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Walkerguy21D said:
    I’ll go 65, thinking the mark on the sun may have held it back, and yes it’s a lovely coin!

    If the coin graded less than 66, it probably wasn’t because of the mark on the sun. While distracting, it’s not significant enough to preclude a grade of 66.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • PerryHall
    PerryHall Posts: 47,752 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Walkerguy21D
    Walkerguy21D Posts: 12,164 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MFeld said:

    @Walkerguy21D said:
    I’ll go 65, thinking the mark on the sun may have held it back, and yes it’s a lovely coin!

    If the coin graded less than 66, it probably wasn’t because of the mark on the sun. While distracting, it’s not significant enough to preclude a grade of 66.

    Thanks Mark; actually I made that comment because of you, as I know you prefer it when posters include their rationale for their guesses.
    Perhaps I’m overly sensitive to marks on the sun, being a walker guy. But even in this case it’s on the reverse, I still found it a bit distracting.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Walkerguy21D said:

    @MFeld said:

    @Walkerguy21D said:
    I’ll go 65, thinking the mark on the sun may have held it back, and yes it’s a lovely coin!

    If the coin graded less than 66, it probably wasn’t because of the mark on the sun. While distracting, it’s not significant enough to preclude a grade of 66.

    Thanks Mark; actually I made that comment because of you, as I know you prefer it when posters include their rationale for their guesses.
    Perhaps I’m overly sensitive to marks on the sun, being a walker guy. But even in this case it’s on the reverse, I still found it a bit distracting.

    I appreciate your having included your rationale. And I agree that the mark distracting.
    One of the things I learned as a grader is that there are a lot of coins that I don’t like, even if they
    appear to be accurately graded.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Batman23
    Batman23 Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65

  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65+ with a sticker.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • tradedollarnut
    tradedollarnut Posts: 20,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    1. Too much going on around the high point of her leg
    Early Dollar Set
  • marcmoish
    marcmoish Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    64+

    Beaned

  • johnny9434
    johnny9434 Posts: 34,068 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Ms 64+, nice coin

  • Kove
    Kove Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65

  • dcarr
    dcarr Posts: 10,257 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS66.

    Moonlight Mint
  • tradedollarnut
    tradedollarnut Posts: 20,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I’m forced to change my guess to 63. The breast area is too flat for 64

    Early Dollar Set
  • Copperindian
    Copperindian Posts: 3,375 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65+

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian
    Copperindian II
    Indy Eagles
    Gold Rush
    Bust Caps

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian
    Nickelodeon
    Early Walkers

    Successful transactions: redraider, winesteven, renomedphys, splitaces, oreville, ajaan, Cent1225, onlyroosies, justindan, blitzdude, DesertMoon, johnnyb, Heubschgold, SunshineRareCoins, ParadimeCoins, ndeagles, Southern_Knights, pcgsregistrycollector, BruceS

  • dunkleosteus430
    dunkleosteus430 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS-66

    I collect world proof sets, coins featuring composers, mid-20th century U.S. proof coins, U.S. type coins, and whatever else I want.

  • alaura22
    alaura22 Posts: 3,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS-64 CAC

    Mike
    My Indians
    Dansco Set

  • Cougar1978
    Cougar1978 Posts: 10,067 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65

    Investor
  • hummingbird_coins
    hummingbird_coins Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65 CAC

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 7, 2026 2:48PM
    Options

    @tradedollarnut said:
    I’m forced to change my guess to 63. The breast area is too flat for 64

    Although I wouldn’t grade the coin that low, I can certainly see your point.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • mirabela
    mirabela Posts: 5,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65 on the basis of it looks way better than the 63 and the couple of 64's I've owned, lol -- nice luster, marks but small, non-violent ones, strike pretty good if not perfect.

    mirabela
  • csdot
    csdot Posts: 737 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65+

    Indian Head $10 Gold Set Album

  • Goob
    Goob Posts: 576 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 7, 2026 3:19PM
    Options

    That’s a beautiful Saint! I’ll guess MS66

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • logger7
    logger7 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Isn't the sun supposed to be virtually mark free for a gem grade?

  • crazyhounddog
    crazyhounddog Posts: 14,250 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 7, 2026 3:33PM
    Options

    My guess is athletes foot 65. A very pretty saint.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • mattniss
    mattniss Posts: 863 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Very nice example! I'm in the MS65 camp, and it deserves a CAC sticker if it doesn't have one at that grade.

  • Smudge
    Smudge Posts: 10,001 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65.

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @logger7 said:
    Isn't the sun supposed to be virtually mark free for a gem grade?

    I’ve never heard of such a requirement.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • oreville
    oreville Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    PCGS graded it MS-65 not CAC. If PCGS graded it MS-64 or 64+ then CAC green stickered it.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • Goldbully
    Goldbully Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS64+ CAC approved

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @oreville said:
    PCGS graded it MS-65 not CAC. If PCGS graded it MS-64 or 64+ then CAC green stickered it.

    Your post and several others included reference to CAC, but the opening post didn’t even indicate that it was submitted their.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MFeld said:

    @oreville said:
    PCGS graded it MS-65 not CAC. If PCGS graded it MS-64 or 64+ then CAC green stickered it.

    Your post and several others included reference to CAC, but the opening post didn’t even indicate that it was submitted there.

    Speaking for myself, I know the OP appreciates CAC's opinion on his coins. I think it's unlikely (but not impossible) that he bought a non-stickered coin and did not subsequently submit it for sticker review.

    I just added my opinion re the sticker for completeness and because it's fun to take a guess and test ones' skills.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • P0CKETCHANGE
    P0CKETCHANGE Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    GRADE REVEAL

    This result may surprise everyone except tradedollarnutcase, who was the only one that guessed correctly.

    I will be sending her off to CAC for sticker review next month and will update the thread when she is back.


  • marcmoish
    marcmoish Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    wow, surprise indeed, don't be surprised if you get a gold.

  • tradedollarnut
    tradedollarnut Posts: 20,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @marcmoish said:
    wow, surprise indeed, don't be surprised if you get a gold.

    And don’t be surprised if it doesn’t sticker. It’s a great looking coin, but JA is funny about high points

    Early Dollar Set
  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Regardless of the number on the holder, that looks like a very lustrous and attractive example, particularly assuming that you likely paid near melt.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 35,933 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The piece is very attractive, but it has a very minor break in the mint frost at the highest points. I think that MS-63 is a fair grade, but it's not a "Gem Unc."

    Here is a 1927 double eagle, graded MS-65, with the coveted "green bean."

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • mattniss
    mattniss Posts: 863 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Here's my 1927 DE, graded MS63 with green CAC, as another reference point.

  • safari_dude
    safari_dude Posts: 698 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I was leaning towards 63/64 with the knee chatter. Good call TDN! Beautiful coin though!

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,875 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Not that it matters, I would have guessed 64 for the flatness in the chest and on the knees. And I would predict no bean at that grade as it technically has friction and CAC hates friction on MS graded coins.

  • oreville
    oreville Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I did not think Liberty’s breast flatness was as serious an issue that @tradedollarnut thought. I was thinking that it was more of a soft strike issue. As far as PCGS grade … it is an older PCGS slab which i and PCGS was more conservative back in the day.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • P0CKETCHANGE
    P0CKETCHANGE Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Just got the coin. In dim angled lighting, it has a pleasant green-gold skin that I wasn't expecting based on the GC photos (forgive the glare in the first set of photos; it was the only way to show it). Looks like nice originality, although gold isn't my specialty.

    There is a touch of light friction on Liberty's breast. I don't have enough experience with Saints to know if it's disqualifying, so this will be a good learning opportunity. I am trying to pick up a couple more to send in one sub.



  • Higashiyama
    Higashiyama Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @BillJones - wonderful rich gold color on your coin.

    Higashiyama
  • tradedollarnut
    tradedollarnut Posts: 20,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Beautiful coin - grade just doesn’t matter in this instance

    Early Dollar Set

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Comment As ...

Categories