Home U.S. Coin Forum

GTG Liberty Nickel


First time submitting a GTG coin. I don't agree with the grade but would like to see how the 'experienced' collector's grade this coin. Thanks for looking :) Jim

Comments

  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 3,921 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It appears Gem or close to with the typical weakness in stars 1,2 and 12,13.

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,211 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jgoetz4 It is also highly unlikely you or anyone would agree with the 'grade' on that slab.
    It's from an untrusted source and you are wise to treat your nickel as raw.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,090 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Solid MS65 and maybe even MS66. If it looks like the photos in-hand it is a very nice example.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 31,475 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2026 9:15AM

    64/65, nice example 👍

  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 710 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks nice. I’ll guess 66.

  • jgoetz4jgoetz4 Posts: 54 ✭✭

    A few more guesses than I'll post the grade as well as the ridiculously low price I paid for it about 3 years ago.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 31,475 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hope ya got it at a decent price as well

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,043 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In that holder, probably 67.
    In a major TPG holder, 65 shot 66.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian
    Copperindian II
    Indy Eagles
    Gold Rush

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian
    Nickelodeon
    Early Walkers

    Successful transactions: redraider, winesteven, renomedphys, splitaces, oreville, ajaan, Cent1225, onlyroosies, justindan, blitzdude, DesertMoon, johnnyb, Heubschgold, SunshineRareCoins, ParadimeCoins, ndeagles, Southern_Knights, pcgsregistrycollector

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My guess is that the coin was graded MS67 and that PCGS would grade it MS65.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • EbeneezerEbeneezer Posts: 393 ✭✭✭

    My personal grade, a solid AU58. The professional graders, MS63.

  • jgoetz4jgoetz4 Posts: 54 ✭✭

    Ok folks, first and foremost, thank you for all the responses. They are greatly appreciated :) And now for the price? I paid $60 at an antique store (Black Rose in Hanover, PA) After looking at it for 10 or 15 mins, I thought it would legitimately grade 64, maybe 65, on a good day if the grader was in a good mood lol. I didn't and still don't believe it's a 66. Thanks again :)

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,587 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2026 11:11AM

    Would say 65 PCGS or NGC.

    Investor
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I was going to say MS-65. It's almost impossible to give higher grades from photos.

    As they say about blind squirrels, acorns and maybe this grading company, "Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once and a while." I have never heard of this grading company.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • jgoetz4jgoetz4 Posts: 54 ✭✭

    Considering what I paid for it, and what the 'sold' prices are on eBay for 63's, I may submit it to either PCGS or NGC. Currently, it's in my 20th century type coins holder.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jgoetz4 said:
    Considering what I paid for it, and what the 'sold' prices are on eBay for 63's, I may submit it to either PCGS or NGC. Currently, it's in my 20th century type coins holder.

    I think that it's a good idea to remove it from the off-brand holder. I know a guy who had some nice coins in such holders, and the holder turned out not to be inert. It damaged the coins and cost him a fair amount of money.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • jgoetz4jgoetz4 Posts: 54 ✭✭

    @BillJones said:

    @jgoetz4 said:
    Considering what I paid for it, and what the 'sold' prices are on eBay for 63's, I may submit it to either PCGS or NGC. Currently, it's in my 20th century type coins holder.

    I think that it's a good idea to remove it from the off-brand holder. I know a guy who had some nice coins in such holders, and the holder turned out not to be inert. It damaged the coins and cost him a fair amount of money.

    I did remove it about 2 weeks after I bought it. I use plastic gloves even on my circulated, older coins.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,448 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There is no way I would venture a guess from those photos. The person that ran that service was notorious for cracking problem coins from PCGS and NGC and straight grading them. Rotate the coin carefully under light to look for hairlines.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,309 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS64
    It makes me wonder how many people this guy screwed and caused another collector to walk away from the hobby. They should be charged with fraud.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,347 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2026 2:00PM

    @Morgan13 said:
    MS64
    It makes me wonder how many people this guy screwed and caused another collector to walk away from the hobby. They should be charged with fraud.

    Regardless of how strongly you feel about it, I recommend being more cautious in your accusations. It could cause you problems.
    Most of the guesses were within one or two points of the assigned grade. That’s not even always the case, with NGC and PCGS coins that are posted here for grade guesses.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan13 said:
    MS64
    It makes me wonder how many people this guy screwed and caused another collector to walk away from the hobby. They should be charged with fraud.

    You should not take this as an endorsement, this is a true basement slab operation. However, even in the trash a gem can be found. This now has a CAC green bean, as I recall I paid $3 for this in the NNC slab.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,882 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerguy21D said:
    In that holder, probably 67.
    In a major TPG holder, 65 shot 66.

    this!

  • oldglorycoinsoldglorycoins Posts: 260 ✭✭✭

    Never seen a basement company undergrade a coin that bad, I'm surprised it's not a 68. If it was cac it's a 63, PCGS 64, ngc 65 and anacs 65 details, questionable color

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file