Home U.S. Coin Forum

Seller on ebay doesn't know anything about his coin...Just that it's rare...

mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

1894-S dime, uncertified. It's been bid to $2500 with a few days to go. Only $5.48 postage cost to the lucky winning bidder. Now, I can't find the picture for the 1894-S piece being offered in Flynn so hesitate to bid on this particular piece.

Could this be a hitherto undiscovered specimen of a great rarity, the 1894-S dime?

The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

Comments

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,449 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Link?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 31,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thats what the S is for, Special

  • GoobGoob Posts: 377 ✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    Link?

    I think I may have found it
    https://ebay.us/m/U74VMt

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am 90% sure that is 100% fake.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Could be a setup. Make it look like seller sold one and had the positive feedback posted either by themselves or a friend. I suppose it uncirculated too!
    I would really like to see this coin.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 11,168 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Funny how there are 3 bids totaling $2500 and bidding started at $2500. I would think that would be hard to do.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,449 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 30, 2026 2:41PM

    @Goob said:

    @MFeld said:
    Link?

    I think I may have found it
    https://ebay.us/m/U74VMt

    Yes, that must be the listing, but please don’t bid on it.😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • BJandTundraBJandTundra Posts: 393 ✭✭✭✭

    How can it be ungraded but still have a CAC?

  • GreenstangGreenstang Posts: 1,581 ✭✭✭✭✭

    He says it is graded by NGC but doesn’t show it in a holder.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,449 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Greenstang said:
    He says it is graded by NGC but doesn’t show it in a holder.

    The listing also claims that the coin is CAC certified. The seller might not even know what that means.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,449 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BJandTundra said:
    How can it be ungraded but still have a CAC?

    It can’t.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • vplite99vplite99 Posts: 1,423 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nope!!!

    Vplite99
  • The first 94s dime he sold was for $400. The buyer said he shipped it without tracking.

  • silverpopsilverpop Posts: 6,911 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd give that dime a hard pass

    1997-present

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,926 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Without the tracking stuff...

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/306895244045

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,567 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:
    Without the tracking stuff...

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/306895244045

    That's a large cent. LOL.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Further research reveals that this particular specimen of 1894-S dime was unknown to David Lawrence as well as Kevin Flynn. Don't anybody accuse me of not doing my due diligence when it comes to the 1894-S dime.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I accidentally came across this listing while hunting for an 1894 Philly issue dime for my one-a-year Barber dime set. I would have posted the link but couldn't make it take here.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Old_Collector said:

    @lcutler said:
    Their only feedback as a seller is another 1894 s dime, they had two of them!

    Scam. Seller had two of the 10 known multi-million dollar coins. Right.
    https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1894-s-10c/4805

    I expect that the S is for the Shanghai mint.

    I've got more than a couple 1894-S dime stories to tell. It's my favorite great rarity. B)

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Run

    Investor
  • EbeneezerEbeneezer Posts: 400 ✭✭✭
    edited May 2, 2026 11:16AM

    Sure, drop good money on it. Ignore the fact that a large part of the reverse details are non-existant. Enjoy your rare coin.

  • blaircountycoinblaircountycoin Posts: 261 ✭✭✭

    I looked at his Ebay listings. Forget the 94s, I want the $30000 1932 slabbed quarter in AU details!

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    eBay looked into my two reports - one that the coin wasn’t genuine and the other, that the seller was misrepresenting the coin as being certified by NGC and CAC. And they determined that the listing wasn’t in violation of their policy.

    They need to ****can their AI bot counterfeit expert.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,449 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S said:

    @MFeld said:
    eBay looked into my two reports - one that the coin wasn’t genuine and the other, that the seller was misrepresenting the coin as being certified by NGC and CAC. And they determined that the listing wasn’t in violation of their policy.

    They need to ****can their AI bot counterfeit expert.

    It’s not only about the failure to eliminate even blatant counterfeits. As mentioned, I also submitted a separate report regarding the seller’s misrepresentation that the coin was certified by NGC and CAC. That should have been a slam dunk determination by human or AI, that the seller was in violation of eBay policy.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • DesertCoinDesertCoin Posts: 339 ✭✭✭

    Fake

    “Land of the free because of the brave”
    “Saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone”
    In Deo solo confidimus


    Member since 2026
    Successful BST transactions with: Ted 1, JWP, bigjpst, Vetter, nickelsciolist,
  • csdotcsdot Posts: 723 ✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @mr1931S said:

    @MFeld said:
    eBay looked into my two reports - one that the coin wasn’t genuine and the other, that the seller was misrepresenting the coin as being certified by NGC and CAC. And they determined that the listing wasn’t in violation of their policy.

    They need to ****can their AI bot counterfeit expert.

    It’s not only about the failure to eliminate even blatant counterfeits. As mentioned, I also submitted a separate report regarding the seller’s misrepresentation that the coin was certified by NGC and CAC. That should have been a slam dunk determination by human or AI, that the seller was in violation of eBay policy.

    Doubt it would get any better if GameStop acquires eBay. :D

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/04/gamestop-ebay-takeover-bid-ryan-cohen-gaming-retail-ecommerce.html

  • Old_CollectorOld_Collector Posts: 876 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 11, 2026 6:04PM

    I watched the new ANA video on Chinese counterfeits, very interesting -- the Chinese manufacturers have 300-500 lot minimums and can provide up to 100,000 a month on some "coins." Also, interesting the comment that basically the entire Red Book has been copied:

    https://youtu.be/0hDieI9gocY?si=35bBbYAXvQ2Uny_H

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 10, 2026 3:11PM

    I am surprised that CoinFacts does not show one. As you can see from the real one at the bottom, which Legend Numismatics handled, the date on the eBay offering does not match. Also the the rims and the dentiles are wrong. The verdict is, this piece is a counterfeit.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s a pretty good fake - or it could be the unique “inverted S” variety!

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The date is generally hard for the fakers to get right. One digit of the date on the counterfeit piece, the "8", looks really bad. Also, look how lame and anemic looking the "1" is.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • Old_CollectorOld_Collector Posts: 876 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 11, 2026 6:08PM

    @MFeld said:

    @mr1931S said:

    @MFeld said:
    eBay looked into my two reports - one that the coin wasn’t genuine and the other, that the seller was misrepresenting the coin as being certified by NGC and CAC. And they determined that the listing wasn’t in violation of their policy.

    They need to ****can their AI bot counterfeit expert.

    It’s not only about the failure to eliminate even blatant counterfeits. As mentioned, I also submitted a separate report regarding the seller’s misrepresentation that the coin was certified by NGC and CAC. That should have been a slam dunk determination by human or AI, that the seller was in violation of eBay policy.

    I reported 2 circulated raw Lincoln cents that are listed as NGC MS64 and PCGS MS65, and the only pictures of the coins were the well worn coins sitting on a flat surface without any slab. AI told me there was no problem with the listings. I give up.

  • Old_CollectorOld_Collector Posts: 876 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:
    I am surprised that CoinFacts does not show one. As you can see from the real one at the bottom, which Legend Numismatics handled, the date on the eBay offering does not match. Also the the rims and the dentiles are wrong. The verdict is, this piece is a counterfeit.

    CoinFacts shows 3 (PR66, PR64+, and PR63): https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1894-s-10c/images/4805
    They are listed at the very end of the proof Barber dimes.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,449 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Old_Collector said:

    @MFeld said:

    @mr1931S said:

    @MFeld said:
    eBay looked into my two reports - one that the coin wasn’t genuine and the other, that the seller was misrepresenting the coin as being certified by NGC and CAC. And they determined that the listing wasn’t in violation of their policy.

    They need to ****can their AI bot counterfeit expert.

    It’s not only about the failure to eliminate even blatant counterfeits. As mentioned, I also submitted a separate report regarding the seller’s misrepresentation that the coin was certified by NGC and CAC. That should have been a slam dunk determination by human or AI, that the seller was in violation of eBay policy.

    I reported 2 circulated raw Lincoln cents that are listed as NGC MS64 and PCGS MS65, and the only pictures of the coins were the well worn coins sitting on a flat surface without any slab. AI told me there was no problem with the listings. I give up.

    Sadly, I’m not surprised at their decision. It’s really difficult to fathom, though, as they shouldn’t need coin experts to get that right.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,011 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The eBay fake doesn’t even look like a proof.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All four digits of the date on the counterfeit piece look like hell. A sorry 1894-S counterfeit I saw many years ago actually had a good-looking date because a genuine 1894 Philly issue was used with an 'S' mintmark soldered on. Horrid looking fake with globules of silver solder hanging on and scorched partially melted features around the soldered on 'S' mintmark.

    Two characters had walked into the coin store (Dan Brown's shop on E. Colfax, Denver) with a coin they were wanting $50K for. 1894-S dime. I was just a customer in the store but they showed me the piece when the store employee they first showed it to said he had to go to the back of the store to discuss with the owner whether they would buy or pass on purchasing. I didn't offer an opinion on their coin but it was very obvious to me they were trying to sell the store a fake.

    The employee came back to the counter and told the two that the shop would buy their coin only if was deemed to be authentic by ANACS.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file