Home U.S. Coin Forum

The Collaborative "Virtual 7070" Type Set Project

11112131416

Comments

  • calgolddivercalgolddiver Posts: 1,697 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lordmarcovan said:

    @winesteven said:
    By the way, I just received some good news today:

    For many years, I had been #3 Current on each of the two PCGS Dansco 7070 Registry Sets (one set with Gold, the other set without Gold). I was never able to compete financially with the two numismatic giants ahead of me - “Black Cat” at #2, and D.L. Hansen at #1.

    Last year Black Cat retired his two #2 sets, so I moved up to #2 Current. Just yesterday, D.L. Hansen retired his two #1 sets, so I now “backed into” #1 Current on each of the two PCGS Dansco 7070 Registry Sets.

    Steve

    Hey! COINgratulations! El Numero Uno!

    Congratulations Steve !!! Well deserved and outstanding coins !!!

    Top 20 Type Set 1792 to present

    Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set

    successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), Downtown1974, Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Proofcollection, Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)

  • calgolddivercalgolddiver Posts: 1,697 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This coin is currently on my want list.

    Top 20 Type Set 1792 to present

    Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set

    successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), Downtown1974, Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Proofcollection, Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)

  • Desert MoonDesert Moon Posts: 6,188 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 4, 2026 7:44PM

    .

    My online coin store - https://desertmoonnm.com/
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 44,802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @winesteven said:
    This was bought as a 64CAM, and got the plus via Reconsideration:

    Wow, what a sharp coin. You seem to do pretty well with Reconsiderations. How would you rank your overall success rate with that, percentage-wise?

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • winestevenwinesteven Posts: 5,376 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2026 4:27AM

    @lordmarcovan said:

    @winesteven said:
    This was bought as a 64CAM, and got the plus via Reconsideration:

    Wow, what a sharp coin. You seem to do pretty well with Reconsiderations. How would you rank your overall success rate with that, percentage-wise?

    Unlike some collectors, I’m a strong believer in maximizing value. With that said, I don’t partake in our wonderful hobby at all for profit. I partake purely for the fun, pleasure, history, art and stories behind many coins. But there’s nothing wrong with maximizing value. If I don’t do it, I know my heirs won’t know how at the time of sale.

    To partially answer your question, I have a LOT more failures than successes! However, at the grade levels I buy, getting a plus added to the whole grade often adds a lot of extra market value. Almost every Reconsideration submission of a group of coins ends up with a noticeable NET increase in market value over the sub cost with round-trip shipping.

    There’s absolutely no doubt in my mind that I would have a higher success rate (including getting some bumps to the next whole grade number) if I used Regrade vs. Reconsideration. With Regrade, they crack out every coin, and guarantee the new grade will NOT be any lower than the initial grade! However, that means a couple of things:

    1. EVERY coin that fails to upgrade will have to be resubmitted to CAC to get the sticker reapplied, but since the cert number WILL be different, I then have to pay the much higher “normal” stickering fee compared to their much lower “re-sticker” fee. Naturally, even the coins that get upgraded would have to pay this higher fee too. With Reconsideration, coins that fail to upgrade get returned in their original holders, with the CAC stickers intact, as no coins get cracked out except those that actually upgrade. Coins that get a plus upgrade via Reconsideration retain the same cert number, so the much lower re-sticker fee is charged.
    2. If a coin gets upgraded to the next higher whole grade number, whether via Reconsideration or Regrade, when sent back to CAC, that coin then must qualify for the sticker to be “solid at that new higher whole grade”. If it isn’t, then “No sticker for you”. Not so with only a plus upgrade, as CAC stickering ignores pluses (CACG recognizes pluses in their grading).

    Steve

    A day without fine wine and working on your coin collection is like a day without sunshine!!!

    My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 44,802 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2026 1:56AM

    @winesteven said:
    Unlike some collectors, I’m a strong believer in maximizing value. With that said, I don’t partake in our wonderful hobby at all for profit. I partake purely for the fun, pleasure, history, art and stories behind many coins. But there’s nothing wrong with maximizing value. If I don’t do it, I know my heirs won’t know how at the time of sale.

    I totally agree with that. It would be silly not to try to maximize value. Since I'm a lean-n'-hungry type with relatively shallow pockets, I try to do that as often as possible. My collection is constantly evolving and I frequently sell and swap stuff, always attempting to "trade up" slightly each time. I am more collector than investor, but do always try to keep the resale value of my coins in mind. Gotta keep an eye on the bottom line.

    I have never used CAC (the few beans I do own were bought that way), but according to your advice, I think I might submit most of my US stuff to them the next time I'm at a big show.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 30,834 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @calgolddiver said:

    AU53 from the bay. A recent addition.

    I like the crusty look

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 30,834 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @winesteven said:
    PR65+ DCAM w/CAC. PCGS Pop = 2, only 1 finer!

    Steve

    Nothing wrong here....

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 30,834 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Mr_Spud said:

    Nice and clean, I like

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file