Why is this not a PF 70
gashmios
Posts: 504 ✭✭✭
I've never been able to really split the difference between a 69 and a 70 and yet big money can ride of the distinction/
Why is this silver Ike not an Proof 70?


So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
2
Comments
Obverse
Reverse
Reverse
the images aren't well lit. we've some of the opinion not to grade proofs from photos.
putting that aside temporarily, coins of this era have many striking flaws and a mark is easily hidden amongst them. this is a job for an ike expert seeing it in hand
Underneath Ike’s ear (on the neck) looks to have break in the frost / scuff marks.
small scratches and spots - look at the jaw and cheek of IKE
http://www.mrbrklyn.com/images/coins/1974_pf69_ike_o.png
http://www.mrbrklyn.com/images/coins/1974_pf69_ike_r.png
run away


Because it's a proof.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
Indeed - so an airplane crashed on the boarder between Vermont and Canada... where are the survivors buried?
Really?
I think I see all kinds of haze and frost breaks and what might be tiny marks (amongst all the dust and marks on the plastic).
The best answer: because the team of experts that viewed the coin in hand saw flaws.
You may, of course, crack it out and send it back in for a new opinion.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
In a Brooklyn boarding (sic) house?
Oldest joke in the book.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
Show me the PROOF!!
The Derby Line library.
Even with perfect images, without a 5x and the coin in hand none of us can tell why it's a 69 vs. a 70.
Collector, occasional seller
A "69" was probably a gift, I'd just be grateful for that.
PR-70 says the coin is "perfect" under 5X magnification, I believe. Something as small was a mint caused spot in the fields, which breaks the mirrored Proof surface, is enough to deduct a point.
I see more tiny problems on that Ike Dollar. I believe that Ike Dollars in PR-70 are quite scarce because the minting standards were not as high then. Furthermore then government packaging encouraged haze which takes the coin out immediately.
I see spots, ticks, and scratches in the picture.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I see hairlines on Ike that shouldn't be there.
from what i can tell it's clearly a 74
That's why PCGS is in business, because you can't determine the grade it is. And even if you did, nobody would listen, because you would have involved interest in your own coin. You buying (or selling) a TPG coin means that there's less argument about the grade.
Micah Langford - https://www.oldglorycoinsandcurrency.com/
Most likely, trying to distinguish 69 vs 70 on a big proof coin like this will require in-hand inspection. Anything else is probably speculation, based on the limited views available in the photographs.
I think so as well. I would had graded it at PF68
Well then why are you wondering if its a PF70?
Micah Langford - https://www.oldglorycoinsandcurrency.com/
What I think mostly only matters to me.
They didn't start making Ikes until 71.
Well, you did sort of make it our business when you posted it on a public forum.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Based on those pics alone, PR-69 DCAM seems generous.
Official PCGS account of:
www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com
A PF70 is a perfect coin.
Honestly does your coin look perfect?
I have a Franklin half that looks perfect but after close examination and trying to be honest with myself about I realize it could be a 68. As others have said 69 is a gift.
Try to stay neutral and accept that its graded properly. Over time you will thank yourself.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP
According to the published PCGS and NGC standards, a coin need not be perfect to receive a grade of 70.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
OP could point that out on the submission form when he resubmits. Do you advise cracking the Ike out of it's holder and then resubmitting. Or leave in the holder?
Einstein’s view of God was non-traditional and pantheistic, focusing on the harmony, order, and intelligibility of the cosmos rather than a personal deity. His quotes reveal a profound respect for the universe’s mysteries, a belief in rational laws, and a moral philosophy grounded in compassion and understanding, bridging science and spirituality.
“My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.”
Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)
I wouldn’t even consider resubmitting that coin for a higher grade. Just because a coin doesn’t need to be “perfect” for a 70, doesn’t mean that one such as the subject coin (with obvious flaws) should be graded higher than 69. Read the published standards.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
At one time, it was not possible to receive a 70 on a coin that was already in the holder due to it not being possible to examine the coin sufficiently once it's encapsulated, especially when the holder itself is impaired. I don't know if that's still the case. Even so, reasons for this coin not to grade 70 were apparent even with the quality of the photos, so the point is rather moot.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
The reason to ask this question is to see what others think. I alrqady know what I think.
But the question should be "why is this coin a 69?" When you ask "why isn't this coin a 70?", it implies that you think it may not be a 69.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
As noted, it is hard to grade a coin from pictures. But...I do not like the coin as a PR69DCAM. To me, Eisenhower's cheek appears to have too many distractions to be a 69. My opinion is PR67DCAM.
I brought that coin because I loved the reverse, but the distinction between a PF69 and PF70 was always a bit of a puzzle for me and the difference in costs can be rude.
fwiw, pcgs shows a pop zero in 70
so it's 68/0
Milk spots. RGDS!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Retiring at 55, what day is today?
Reverse scratch
I believe you but I don't see that.