Home Sports Talk

Let's talk about our "Jimmy the Greek specials"

18081828385

Comments

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Raiders now at -4

    They've also had their share of headlines lately. Including of course that they just got blown out by the woeful Cowboys.

    I'm already in at -3 and no intentions of canceling the bet. Perhaps Sanders will show on Sunday that he is the future GOAT? But I'm betting against it.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 20, 2025 8:36PM

    i was very apprehensive about including Buffalo in that parlay

    but i thought surely they won't lay an egg like they did against Miami, and surely they can beat Davis Mills of all people

    well they did and they can't, and don't call me Shirley

    they are not a great team. get them on the road and they can lose to anyone. even Atlanta got them

  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 10,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Bills have not won in Houston in 19 years. Allen is now 0-4 in Houston.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Finally smashed an NBA PRA bet, I literally have lost several.in a row by one guy missing by 1 point

    I decided to switch it up.and add in some 3 point overs and it worked

    James Harden and Maxey were the highlights for these

    Lost about $400 before these hit so looks good but not all of it is gravy

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @perkdog said:

    Finally smashed an NBA PRA bet, I literally have lost several.in a row by one guy missing by 1 point

    I decided to switch it up.and add in some 3 point overs and it worked

    James Harden and Maxey were the highlights for these

    Lost about $400 before these hit so looks good but not all of it is gravy

    Plus that fat 100% parlay boost. The 35% wasn't bad either.👍

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    nice hit perk!

    switching gears on OKC tonight. going against them, but only on the spread. so many points.

    the Mavs are a shell of themselves without Luka, but the Pelicans suck worse

    -3748.58

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:
    nice hit perk!

    switching gears on OKC tonight. going against them, but only on the spread. so many points.

    the Mavs are a shell of themselves without Luka, but the Pelicans suck worse

    -3748.58

    Thanks bud!!

    I. looked at that line and thought the same thing, OKC on the road laying that many seems like a big ask

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    OKC appeared in their previous game, to be playing with one hand tied behind their back. The spread if I'm remembering right, was 16.5 and they won by 14, something like that.

    That team is so dam good, they can win games playing at 3/4 speed. Of course the problem is if playing the spread with them, it could be very dangerous.

    Of course if the other team quits, or it turns into garbage time and the second stringers can't hit a bucket, then OKC covers.

    Considering all that uncertainty, if the very low ML odds aren't palatable, it's not a bad idea at all to play it the way ya just played it. Solid bet in my opinion.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 21, 2025 8:15AM

    @stevek said:

    OKC appeared in their previous game, to be playing with one hand tied behind their back. The spread if I'm remembering right, was 16.5 and they won by 14, something like that.

    That team is so dam good, they can win games playing at 3/4 speed. Of course the problem is if playing the spread with them, it could be very dangerous.

    Of course if the other team quits, or it turns into garbage time and the second stringers can't hit a bucket, then OKC covers.

    Considering all that uncertainty, if the very low ML odds aren't palatable, it's not a bad idea at all to play it the way ya just played it. Solid bet in my opinion.

    it's actually kinda fun incorporating them into a wager whenever they play. they never lose, but they're going to eventually. i'm dying to catch them on the night they do via the ML. but instead of standing in front of that train, i'm going to start taking the colossal number of points they hand over each time they play. so even if they keep defying the odds by winning every game, my hope is that it'll at least end up within the number.

    who knows, maybe they go 81-1 this season and win every game here on out by 30. :D

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It would be a crying shame to go 81-1, and thus not go undefeated. 😆

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    won the first leg of my parlay tonight when the Mavs took out the Pelicans 118-115

    then it was on to leg #2, whereby Utah was getting 21 points against OKC

    try not to laugh

    with 7:02 left in the 3rd quarter:

    Utah 84
    OKC 77

    what a genius i am. what an easy, peasy win.

    final score:

    OKC 144
    Utah 112

    😂

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    For some reason, tonight's OKC game reminded me of a scene from Blazing Saddles. The sheriff and the gunslinger are discussing ways on how to handle Mongo? The gunslinger, Gene Wilder, says something like, Don't shoot him, you'll only make him mad.

    The Jazz got up 14 points at the end of the first quarter, and OKC got mad.

    This Thunder team is just crazy good.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 21, 2025 9:39PM

    @stevek said:

    For some reason, tonight's OKC game reminded me of a scene from Blazing Saddles. The sheriff and the gunslinger are discussing ways on how to handle Mongo? The gunslinger, Gene Wilder, says something like, Don't shoot him, you'll only make him mad.

    The Jazz got up 14 points at the end of the first quarter, and OKC got mad.

    This Thunder team is just crazy good.

    i beat you to it by a minute

    check out my post

    i was up 28 with about a quarter and a half to go

    not only did i not win, but it wasn't even close

    when i saw what was going on i started laughing like Muttley

    OKC is capable of otherworldly things

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Texas A&M is -54.5
    The under is 59.5

    Right now, both of those lines are getting the most action. Talk about threading the needle. To win both bets, Texas A&M would have to win by at least 55, but not more than 59.

    May be some interesting betting value here, but I'll be damed if i can find it. LOL

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I just arrived home from the Galaxy handicapping seminar of finding value in low odds ML parlays.

    My first go at it - ML parlay - Ohio State, Miami, Utah

    BTW - the seminar price was expensive, but worth it. And the hors d'oeuvres were absolutely delicious.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    since you ponied up for my pricey seminar and enjoyed the hors d'oeuvres, hookers and blow, i'm going to tail you

    except i substituted OSU with Missouri and the points. why? because i've witnessed that line shrink by more than a FG this week. why has money been pouring in on the Tigers? no earthly idea, but i'm going to pretend like i know why and simply follow suit

    -3803.58

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 22, 2025 10:35AM

    First quarter lines are a fun way to get some quick action

    Even funner when you win lol

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:
    since you ponied up for my pricey seminar and enjoyed the hors d'oeuvres, hookers and blow,

    >
    Tell Crystal I said "Hi" - she will remember me, I'm a good tipper. 😎

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    galaxy to the whales: "hey why are we betting on Missouri again?"

    whales to galaxy: "just be quiet, get in your vehicle, and follow us."

    car goes over the cliff

    galaxy to the whales: "are you sure about this?"

    whales to galaxy: "be quiet, everything's fine"

    💥 💥 💥 🚗 💥 💥 💥

    -3853.58

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek said:
    I just arrived home from the Galaxy handicapping seminar of finding value in low odds ML parlays.

    My first go at it - ML parlay - Ohio State, Miami, Utah

    BTW - the seminar price was expensive, but worth it. And the hors d'oeuvres were absolutely delicious.

    Kansas runner has 229 yards rushing on 9 carries. In the first half!

    I seem to find every way possible to lose these parlays.

    Not over yet, but I'm not sure Utah is good enough to overcome this. Two easy stops turning into long touchdowns? Ridiculous. That D coach should be fired at halftime. 😒

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek said:

    @stevek said:
    I just arrived home from the Galaxy handicapping seminar of finding value in low odds ML parlays.

    My first go at it - ML parlay - Ohio State, Miami, Utah

    BTW - the seminar price was expensive, but worth it. And the hors d'oeuvres were absolutely delicious.

    Kansas runner has 229 yards rushing on 9 carries. In the first half!

    I seem to find every way possible to lose these parlays.

    Not over yet, but I'm not sure Utah is good enough to overcome this. Two easy stops turning into long touchdowns? Ridiculous. That D coach should be fired at halftime. 😒

    Now I know what you're thinking. Stevek should be overjoyed that he hit his parley, after basically spotting Kansas 14 points, and Utah coming back late with a miracle win. But I'm not happy at all having to sweat it out like this. I'm still hissed off.

    Just kidding. 😂😂😂😂😂

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Also caught the Oregon game spread -10.5

    Loved that game, but I was too chicken chit to post it here. 😆

    Bankroll now in decent plus side territory, but still not good enough.

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What's up in that Georgia Tech game. Georgia Tech was -2.5 ranked 16th in the country, playing at home. Now losing 28-0 early in the second quarter?

    Might be an interesting live opportunity. I'll have to take a look at it.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    my 10-teamer is still alive going into tomorrow (4 legs to go)

    adding this 4-teamer

    -3736.84

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭


    I put in 4 bets yesterday, hitting 3 out of 4, small tickles nothing big

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well the Sanders game is coming up today. Line at Raiders -3.5 which is close to where it opened.

    I initially thought this line would move to around Raiders -5 or -6, because of the horrible way Sanders previously played. Evidently since the line stayed close to where it opened, around half the public believes that Sander will improve off that first NFL game effort. Sure can't get much worse.

    Frankly, I'm seeing a Johnny Manziel part two here. But if it ain't, then it ain't. We shall see.

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rams ML

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @perkdog said:

    I put in 4 bets yesterday, hitting 3 out of 4, small tickles nothing big

    Never played a quarter bet, never even looked at it.

    But I can see that there may be some interesting opportunities. I'm gonna start looking at it, depending on the game.

    The 3rd quarter might be the most interesting. Figuring which team will make the best halftime adjustments. Not sure if that's available or not at half5time?

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 23, 2025 8:00AM

    @stevek said:

    @perkdog said:

    I put in 4 bets yesterday, hitting 3 out of 4, small tickles nothing big

    Never played a quarter bet, never even looked at it.

    But I can see that there may be some interesting opportunities. I'm gonna start looking at it, depending on the game.

    The 3rd quarter might be the most interesting. Figuring which team will make the best halftime adjustments. Not sure if that's available or not at half5time?

    Yep you can bet ML or spread for any quarter or half, O/U as well

    Basically there isn't much you cannot bet lol

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 23, 2025 8:03AM

    @stevek said:

    Well the Sanders game is coming up today. Line at Raiders -3.5 which is close to where it opened.

    I initially thought this line would move to around Raiders -5 or -6, because of the horrible way Sanders previously played. Evidently since the line stayed close to where it opened, around half the public believes that Sander will improve off that first NFL game effort. Sure can't get much worse.

    Frankly, I'm seeing a Johnny Manziel part two here. But if it ain't, then it ain't. We shall see.

    you may have a little bit of tunnel vision going on. the reason the line isn't on the move is because the Browns, as horrendous as they are, are playing an equally horrendous team in the Raiders. and as bad as Sanders looked last week, you also have to realize he isn't exactly going up against Ken Stabler today. Geno Smith is tied for the league lead in INTs and Cleveland's defense -- which is strong enough to keep them in games -- has the best pass defense in the NFL.

    it's just a godawful matchup, and personally i'd look elsewhere to park my money. it's almost as if the oddsmakers didn't know what to do with those two, so they gave the home team (Vegas) the obligatory 3 points and washed their hands of the situation. the line implies that if they were playing at a neutral site, it would be a virtual coin flip.

    and flipping a coin would be just as effective as trying to handicap those two atrocities

    .02

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @perkdog

    you may have stumbled across a new drug with those 1st Q spreads

    the great thing about them, in addition to winning like you did yesterday, is that it's over QUICK

    no dying and coming back to life 15 times over the course of four quarters

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 23, 2025 9:13AM

    one more. parlays & teasers abound.

    funny to call today's game must-win for my 7-3 team, but it is. we're at home, Rodgers out & Rudolph in, and the sked gets very rough after today and it doesn't stop until the reg season ends. gotta have it. we won't play extra football without it.

    same for KC. they lose to Indy today and it'll be time to start looking for a fork.

    and no way, no how am i going to attempt to stand in front of the OKC train again after what happened to me two nights ago. i said a while back i was betting on them until they lost again and i foolishly deviated. back on track.

    gl to all today

    -3736.84

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:

    @stevek said:

    Well the Sanders game is coming up today. Line at Raiders -3.5 which is close to where it opened.

    I initially thought this line would move to around Raiders -5 or -6, because of the horrible way Sanders previously played. Evidently since the line stayed close to where it opened, around half the public believes that Sander will improve off that first NFL game effort. Sure can't get much worse.

    Frankly, I'm seeing a Johnny Manziel part two here. But if it ain't, then it ain't. We shall see.

    you may have a little bit of tunnel vision going on. the reason the line isn't on the move is because the Browns, as horrendous as they are, are playing an equally horrendous team in the Raiders. and as bad as Sanders looked last week, you also have to realize he isn't exactly going up against Ken Stabler today. Geno Smith is tied for the league lead in INTs and Cleveland's defense -- which is strong enough to keep them in games -- has the best pass defense in the NFL.

    it's just a godawful matchup, and personally i'd look elsewhere to park my money. it's almost as if the oddsmakers didn't know what to do with those two, so they gave the home team (Vegas) the obligatory 3 points and washed their hands of the situation. the line implies that if they were playing at a neutral site, it would be a virtual coin flip.

    and flipping a coin would be just as effective as trying to handicap those two atrocities

    .02

    "you may have a little bit of tunnel vision going on."

    Admittedly, I just don't personally like this guy. However I try not to let that affect my handicapping. Same as I do being a homer for the Eagles, I try not to let that affect my handicapping either.

    Overall, I don't disagree with ya. I had mentioned previously with this game, either here or in the Sanders thread, about how awful are the Raiders. Certainly as you clearly mentioned about the Raiders, that has a lot to do with the lack of a significant odds change.

    I placed my bet early at -3 on the Raiders, around six or seven days ago, figuring I'd get good value on it with the line moving strongly in my favor. That didn't happen. I could just cancel the bet because I agree it seems like a coin flip type bet, and one of the fastest ways to go broke with bookies is betting heads or tails against their juice. That being said, with the line moving just a half point in my favor, it did add 16% value to the odds. So I'm just going to leave the bet alone and see what happens.

    Current odds of winning the Super Bowl - the bottom feeders.

    Cardinals: +100000
    Commanders: +100000
    Browns: +100000
    Titans: +100000
    Jets: +100000
    Giants: +100000
    Saints: +100000
    Dolphins: +100000
    Raiders: +100000

    The bookies this time of the season are fishing for the world's worst suckers. I mean the odds on any of these teams winning the Super Bowl, should be, +all the money in the world, and it would still be a sucker bet. 😂

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek

    gl man. hope LV does it for you.

    another guy we haven't mentioned is Jeanty. loved him at Boise, and i was really hoping the Bears would get their hands on him in the draft. to this point he has had a very subpar season. i'm sure his o-line sucks as much as his QB does, so it can't be all on him. here's hoping for a breakout game with 2 or 3 house calls.

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good luck fellas!!

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pregame, I liked the Colts in that Chiefs game but not quite enough to play.

    Colts scored first, ahead 7-0 and they were +2.5? Couldn't believe it, so I popped it. Now 14-3 Colts.

    This weekend just going too good. I'm waiting for the crash? Maybe the Chiefs come back in this game and win by 3. LOL

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Didn't play this game, I thought the ML on the Lions was too low. Lions now down by 10 against the Giants. But the odds are Lions -3.5?

    Really like the Lions to still win this game. I'm gonna just watch it, but I think I'm gonna regret not swallowing hard and giving up the -3.5 or at least playing the ML. 🤔

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek said:

    This weekend just going too good.

    time for a big one!

    (that's what she said)

    your boys are only -3 & -155 against Jerry's girls B)

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:

    @stevek said:

    This weekend just going too good.

    time for a big one!

    (that's what she said)

    your boys are only -3 & -155 against Jerry's girls B)

    Haven't actually took a "close" look at the game yet.

    A possible angle I do like is the Eagles very low scoring the past few games. So the bookie's computer may increase the odds on Hurts, Barkley and other Eagles props because of that. Might be some nice value there.

    I might go "prop crazy" on the game, but then again one thing I've been doing right since starting this last season, is to not force the bet or talk myself into it for any reason. I review the math, look at the qualitative factors, and let the bet come to me. Similar to the way Albert Einstein used to do when developing his amazing theories.

    Just kidding of course about the Einstein comparison. I just wanted to blow Darin's mind for a split second if he read it. 😂

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 23, 2025 12:01PM

    @stevek said:

    Just kidding of course about the Einstein comparison. I just wanted to blow Darin's mind for a split second if he read it. 😂

    when i read that i immediately had a vision that consisted of moths and a flame

    i was dying over here

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Stresssss

    I'm sweating over some passing props right about know 🫣

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:

    @stevek said:

    Just kidding of course about the Einstein comparison. I just wanted to blow Darin's mind for a split second if he read it. 😂

    when i read that i immediately had a vision that consisted of moths and a flame

    i was dying over here

    I see your parlays are doing well so far. Just need the Lions in the one parlay to step it up and take care of an inferior team.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek said:

    I see your parlays are doing well so far. Just need the Lions in the one parlay to step it up and take care of an inferior team.

    actually they're in trouble. the Chiefs are a hard watch and i think your team made the Lions retarded the week before because they're making Jameis Winston look like Y.A. Tittle today

    i need mucho help

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:

    @stevek said:

    I see your parlays are doing well so far. Just need the Lions in the one parlay to step it up and take care of an inferior team.

    actually they're in trouble. the Chiefs are a hard watch and i think your team made the Lions retarded the week before because they're making Jameis Winston look like Y.A. Tittle today

    i need mucho help

    Sorry, I didn't see where you had the Chiefs.

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sanders +110 for only 20 yards rushing? What?

    I figured he'd be running for his life all game. And maybe gain over 100 yards rushing, at least 50?

    Also line just moved to Raiders -3.

    Perhaps the low rushing prop is because if he messes up early, the coach will pull him? I dunno.

    I'm missing something in this game, so I'm gonna pass on it, just leaving alone the Raiders -3 as previously mentioned.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    if OKC wins tonight it'll be a clean sweep for moi today

    fortunate is an understatement............the Lions were dead, and so were the Chiefs

    i'm just going to give the gambling gods a bear hug and walk away

    hope you guys raked today

  • DarinDarin Posts: 7,388 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:

    @stevek said:

    Well the Sanders game is coming up today. Line at Raiders -3.5 which is close to where it opened.

    I initially thought this line would move to around Raiders -5 or -6, because of the horrible way Sanders previously played. Evidently since the line stayed close to where it opened, around half the public believes that Sander will improve off that first NFL game effort. Sure can't get much worse.

    Frankly, I'm seeing a Johnny Manziel part two here. But if it ain't, then it ain't. We shall see.

    you may have a little bit of tunnel vision going on. the reason the line isn't on the move is because the Browns, as horrendous as they are, are playing an equally horrendous team in the Raiders. and as bad as Sanders looked last week, you also have to realize he isn't exactly going up against Ken Stabler today. Geno Smith is tied for the league lead in INTs and Cleveland's defense -- which is strong enough to keep them in games -- has the best pass defense in the NFL.

    it's just a godawful matchup, and personally i'd look elsewhere to park my money. it's almost as if the oddsmakers didn't know what to do with those two, so they gave the home team (Vegas) the obligatory 3 points and washed their hands of the situation. the line implies that if they were playing at a neutral site, it would be a virtual coin flip.

    and flipping a coin would be just as effective as trying to handicap those two atrocities

    .02

    Galaxy- this is one of the best cautionary posts I’ve read here. Okay probably the only cautionary post I’ve read here. Usually it’s damn the torpedos full speed ahead.😁

    Full disclosure, I’m not betting much at all this year, occasional nfl parlay. I hope you guys all win money, even stevek believe it or not and I just thought this was a good post about not putting hard earned money on an awful team. Hard enough to win when you bet on a good team.
    Win some money dudes, and I am serious Steve you too, I know how hard it is to win at sports betting.

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Darin said:

    @galaxy27 said:

    @stevek said:

    Well the Sanders game is coming up today. Line at Raiders -3.5 which is close to where it opened.

    I initially thought this line would move to around Raiders -5 or -6, because of the horrible way Sanders previously played. Evidently since the line stayed close to where it opened, around half the public believes that Sander will improve off that first NFL game effort. Sure can't get much worse.

    Frankly, I'm seeing a Johnny Manziel part two here. But if it ain't, then it ain't. We shall see.

    you may have a little bit of tunnel vision going on. the reason the line isn't on the move is because the Browns, as horrendous as they are, are playing an equally horrendous team in the Raiders. and as bad as Sanders looked last week, you also have to realize he isn't exactly going up against Ken Stabler today. Geno Smith is tied for the league lead in INTs and Cleveland's defense -- which is strong enough to keep them in games -- has the best pass defense in the NFL.

    it's just a godawful matchup, and personally i'd look elsewhere to park my money. it's almost as if the oddsmakers didn't know what to do with those two, so they gave the home team (Vegas) the obligatory 3 points and washed their hands of the situation. the line implies that if they were playing at a neutral site, it would be a virtual coin flip.

    and flipping a coin would be just as effective as trying to handicap those two atrocities

    .02

    Galaxy- this is one of the best cautionary posts I’ve read here. Okay probably the only cautionary post I’ve read here. Usually it’s damn the torpedos full speed ahead.😁

    Full disclosure, I’m not betting much at all this year, occasional nfl parlay. I hope you guys all win money, even stevek believe it or not and I just thought this was a good post about not putting hard earned money on an awful team. Hard enough to win when you bet on a good team.
    Win some money dudes, and I am serious Steve you too, I know how hard it is to win at sports betting.

    One great thing about this thread is win or lose, we all root for each other.

    I took a few hits today, but nothing that bad. Fortunately I had nothing on the Eagles. Decided to just watch it.

    The only game I actually liked on this entire NFL card today was the Rams game coming up. Already decided on the Rams ML. Gotta see if there's any props worth playing.

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 23, 2025 6:46PM

    Hit a Draft Kings special, got lucky with the Mayfield TD

    I hope Draft Kings got it shoved up their rear end with this one

    This helped a lot, only down about $40 today and probably even give or take literally like $10 for the weekend so no big score but got a lot of action and I'm good with it

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @perkdog said:

    Hit a Draft Kings special, got lucky with the Mayfield TD

    I hope Draft Kings got it shoved up their rear end with this one

    This helped a lot, only down about $40 today and probably even give or take literally like $10 for the weekend so no big score but got a lot of action and I'm good with it

    2-1 odds on that prop which figured to be a shootout? Seems fat to me. Terrific value!

    You are getting scary good at finding these value props. I mean Mayfield throws two picks, and you still hit it. 👍

Sign In or Register to comment.