[GTG] 1921 Peace Dollar **GRADE REVEALED IN COMMENT**
Result shall be posted within 36 hours. Any and all comments on the coin are welcome. 
Comments
-
wow... MS65?... very nice!!
Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.1 -
High end 65... I'll also guess it's been beaned by now fwiw
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled0 -
64, primarily due to thin, but long reverse scratch in left field. The movement in the video is considerably too fast.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
2 -
I first thought higher end 64... saw the scratch on the reverse... but then got hypnotized by the video of the obverse...
Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.0 -
66
1 -
63 RGDS!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Retiring at 55, what day is today?
1 -
@MFeld said:
The movement in the video is considerably too fast.It’s because I have to reduce the frame rate significantly to get the animated GIF to a file size that the forum software will accept. If you have knowledge about how to post full resolution video in a post, I am all ears.
Barring that, I think having the video as-is is better than not having it for purposes of evaluating the coin.
0 -
My first thought was MS64.
0 -
MS65 - nice ‘21!
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Copperindian II
Indy Eagles
Gold Rush
Bust CapsRetired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
Nickelodeon
Early WalkersSuccessful transactions: redraider, winesteven, renomedphys, splitaces, oreville, ajaan, Cent1225, onlyroosies, justindan, blitzdude, DesertMoon, johnnyb, Heubschgold, SunshineRareCoins, ParadimeCoins, ndeagles, Southern_Knights, pcgsregistrycollector, BruceS
0 -
I would say MS-65+. For once the obverse is better than the reverse. If the reverse rules, you could go as low as MS-64 because there is a significant mark on the eagle's back, and there appears to be a very thin but long pin scratch running through to tops of the rays. Still I think think that the obverse will probably carry the piece.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?0 -
Looks a tad bit too shiny in the video therefore I will be contrarian and say Unc details cleaned.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
0 -
Leaning towards MS64
Collector, occasional seller
0 -
@BillJones said:
I would say MS-65+. For once the obverse is better than the reverse. If the reverse rules, you could go as low as MS-64 because there is a significant mark on the eagle's back, and there appears to be a very thin but long pin scratch running through to tops of the rays. Still I think think that the obverse will probably carry the piece.It appears to be in a solid light blue label holder which I believe was in use prior to the inception of the plus grade.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled1 -
64+
mirabela1 -
64+ too, and a like.
1 -
64
0 -
64+ despite the reverse scratch. No CAC.
Always looking for attractive rim toned Morgan and Peace dollars in PCGS or (older) ANA/ANACS holders!
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne0 -
@hummingbird_coins said:
@BillJones said:
I would say MS-65+. For once the obverse is better than the reverse. If the reverse rules, you could go as low as MS-64 because there is a significant mark on the eagle's back, and there appears to be a very thin but long pin scratch running through to tops of the rays. Still I think think that the obverse will probably carry the piece.It appears to be in a solid light blue label holder which I believe was in use prior to the inception of the plus grade.
I believe "plus grading" at PCGS began in 2010. This holder has prongs which did not appear until 2011.
1 -
63
1 -
-
Rub on the eagle and portrait?
AU55.0 -
@OnBendedKnee said:
Rub on the eagle and portrait?
AU55.That's strike weakness. Believe it or not, this coin is quite well struck for the date.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled0 -
-
64 here, can’t get to 65 but nice luster.
@P0CKETCHANGE said:
@MFeld said:
The movement in the video is considerably too fast.It’s because I have to reduce the frame rate significantly to get the animated GIF to a file size that the forum software will accept. If you have knowledge about how to post full resolution video in a post, I am all ears.
Barring that, I think having the video as-is is better than not having it for purposes of evaluating the coin.
Using a Vimeo link is the only method I’ve found that shows a video well. IG posts don’t seem to work anymore, but the Vimeo links embed into the post so viewers don’t have to venture off from the site. That said, my personal preference would be to have the higher quality video even if it means it won’t be embed here.
1 -
I'm guessing 64 also
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS880 -
Net 65 shot 64+
(66 obverse, 64 reverse)1 -
55? Yikes, prob. not even a CAC grade at that level. It has the look of a 65 even with a few warts on reverse. Clearly better, at least to my eyes, than 64s and a nice strike at that. Prob. dipped in the past but not objectionably so.
Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
Well, just Love coins, period.0 -
MS 65+
Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
0 -
I think the scratch will keep it down to MS64.
0 -
@PeakRarities said:
Using a Vimeo link is the only method I’ve found that shows a video well. IG posts don’t seem to work anymore, but the Vimeo links embed into the post so viewers don’t have to venture off from the site. That said, my personal preference would be to have the higher quality video even if it means it won’t be embed here.Thanks Dan. I’ll try Vimeo next time if it embeds within the post. IG used to work that way but seems to be blocked now. I don’t want to use external links as I know some forum members do not click them, and everyone should have the same information for a GTG.
0 -
65
Tom
0 -
Best 58 Ever !
0 -
Sold! lol
Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
Well, just Love coins, period.0 -
@7Jaguars said:
55? Yikes, prob. not even a CAC grade at that level. It has the look of a 65 even with a few warts on reverse. Clearly better, at least to my eyes, than 64s and a nice strike at that. Prob. dipped in the past but not objectionably so.Just wondering, where are you seeing any wear or flatness on the high points?
0 -
@PeakRarities said:
@7Jaguars said:
55? Yikes, prob. not even a CAC grade at that level. It has the look of a 65 even with a few warts on reverse. Clearly better, at least to my eyes, than 64s and a nice strike at that. Prob. dipped in the past but not objectionably so.Just wondering, where are you seeing any wear or flatness on the high points?
Dan, I believe that was a reply to an earlier post I have copied below. And this serves as a good example of the confusion that can result from not quoting the post to which you’re replying.
OnBendedKneeOnBendedKnee Posts: 261 ✭✭✭ May 4, 2025 12:31AM
Rub on the eagle and portrait?
AU55.Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
0 -
@hummingbird_coins said:
That's strike weakness. Believe it or not, this coin is quite well struck for the date.
This statement confuses me just a little.
0 -
@braddick said:
@hummingbird_coins said:
That's strike weakness. Believe it or not, this coin is quite well struck for the date.
This statement confuses me just a little.
How about: The missing detail is due to some weakness in strike, not wear. However, this example is still above average in strike for a 1921”. ?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
5 -
^
0 -
@MFeld said:
@braddick said:
@hummingbird_coins said:
That's strike weakness. Believe it or not, this coin is quite well struck for the date.
This statement confuses me just a little.
How about: The missing detail is due to some weakness in strike, not wear. However, this example is still above average in strike for a 1921”. ?
Ahhh my mistake, thanks Mark. Excuse my misinterpretation @7jaguars, it looks like we're on the same page.
0 -
This coin is graded MS64+. Thanks all for input. Many guesses were close. Shoutout to @mirabela with first 64+ guess. I acquired it from the good folks at Witter Coin. It’s as nice as I could expect below a true gem IMO.
12 -
Beautiful.
I am glad I was terribly wrong.0 -
@PeakRarities said:
@MFeld said:
@braddick said:
@hummingbird_coins said:
That's strike weakness. Believe it or not, this coin is quite well struck for the date.
This statement confuses me just a little.
How about: The missing detail is due to some weakness in strike, not wear. However, this example is still above average in strike for a 1921”. ?
Ahhh my mistake, thanks Mark. Excuse my misinterpretation @7jaguars, it looks like we're on the same page.
Indeed!
I do like it at that grade & would have possibly been a buyer as well. I know it sounds rather crass but wonder at the price paid??
Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
Well, just Love coins, period.0 -
@7Jaguars said:
I do like it at that grade & would have possibly been a buyer as well. I know it sounds rather crass but wonder at the price paid??PM’d
0 -
I"m glad I was wrong but couldn"t muster up a straight grade with that video.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
0 -
Well deserved grade & sticker. Very nice.
0 -
Very nice. For comparison here's my MS64 VAM 3 that just came back with CAC sticker.
0 -
It's gorgeous. I really like it. One like that is on my list for the last handful of things my collection needs. Great addition to yours.
mirabela1 -
I was torn between 64 and 65, so the grade makes sense to me.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
0
resized.jpg)
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.5K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 60 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum