GTG 1903-O Morgan **Revealed**

Options
AlanSki
AlanSki Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 15, 2024 10:05PM in U.S. Coin Forum



Comments

  • World67
    World67 Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    64

  • Connecticoin
    Connecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Looks like at 58, but would not be surprised if it got 62 or 63. I kind of like its "crustiness".

  • Morgan13
    Morgan13 Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2024 3:12PM
    Options

    64
    This type of toner makes her nose look like she was married to Ike Turner.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP PROMETHIUS88

  • jughead1893
    jughead1893 Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    64

  • jfriedm56
    jfriedm56 Posts: 3,101 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58

  • privatecoin
    privatecoin Posts: 3,853 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    63

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • braddick
    braddick Posts: 25,185 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    You have always got totally cool coins. I look forward to your threads.
    My guess, MS65 (and I don't know why).

  • DelawareDoons
    DelawareDoons Posts: 3,444 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Weird to see a toned 03-O.

    64.

    "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 35,935 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    It’s impossible to grade a toned piece like this from two pictures. If the toning gone too far, and killed the cartwheel luster or broken, it can’t be “choice.”

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • braddick
    braddick Posts: 25,185 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Ah, man. Cougar1978 laughed a my guess. . .

    :/

  • BustHalfBrian
    BustHalfBrian Posts: 4,200 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    64

  • 124Spider
    124Spider Posts: 1,270 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The obverse looks awful, to my eye; mushy and tarnished. The reverse looks fine.

    Comparing it to my 1903-O (PCGS/CAC MS64), I vastly prefer mine to that one (but, of course, I don't like toning or crust, or whatever one wants to call it).

    MS62 on a good day.

  • jp84
    jp84 Posts: 224 ✭✭✭
    Options

    AU55

  • AlanSki
    AlanSki Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Funny whoever was laughing at the 64/65 guesses was incorrect.

  • logger7
    logger7 Posts: 9,859 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'm not surprised, was probably graded in the 90s.

  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 35,935 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The tiny bit of the obverse that is peaking out below the grading label tells more about this coin than the obverse photo in the OP. It shows color and luster.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Mick999
    Options

    Here's mine

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file