Home› U.S. Coin Forum

GTG 1903-O Morgan **Revealed**

AlanSkiAlanSki Posts: 1,925 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 15, 2024 9:05PM in U.S. Coin Forum



Comments

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,896 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like at 58, but would not be surprised if it got 62 or 63. I kind of like its "crustiness".

    *For Sale on BST* *For Sale on Ebay*
  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2024 2:12PM

    64
    This type of toner makes her nose look like she was married to Ike Turner.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan

  • jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 1,399 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,391 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You have always got totally cool coins. I look forward to your threads.
    My guess, MS65 (and I don't know why).

    peacockcoins

  • DelawareDoonsDelawareDoons Posts: 3,413 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Weird to see a toned 03-O.

    64.

    "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,991 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s impossible to grade a toned piece like this from two pictures. If the toning gone too far, and killed the cartwheel luster or broken, it can’t be “choice.”

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ah, man. Cougar1978 laughed a my guess. . .

    :/

    peacockcoins

  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,164 ✭✭✭✭

    64

    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • 124Spider124Spider Posts: 940 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The obverse looks awful, to my eye; mushy and tarnished. The reverse looks fine.

    Comparing it to my 1903-O (PCGS/CAC MS64), I vastly prefer mine to that one (but, of course, I don't like toning or crust, or whatever one wants to call it).

    MS62 on a good day.

  • jp84jp84 Posts: 202 ✭✭✭

    AU55

  • AlanSkiAlanSki Posts: 1,925 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Funny whoever was laughing at the 64/65 guesses was incorrect.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm not surprised, was probably graded in the 90s.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,991 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The tiny bit of the obverse that is peaking out below the grading label tells more about this coin than the obverse photo in the OP. It shows color and luster.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Mick999Mick999 Posts: 8 ✭

    Here's mine

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...