1895's come extremely well made, and while expensive, they are not that hard to find. The price curve is so flat for these, that unless you are in love with the look of that one, I would wait and get a nicer looking one.
I sure as hell wouldn't kick that coin out of my collection.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I’d be really happy with that one. Many people who collect business strike Morgans like to add the 1895 proof, because of the fact that no business strikes were made in Philadelphia that year. I understand the thought process and it makes sense. 👍
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
I've found the coin I've been wanting to buy for the last eight years, but it's in strong hands and not going anywhere. And it's not the kind of coin I can just happen to find.
"Vou invadir o Nordeste, "Seu cabra da peste, "Sou Mangueira......."
This thread goes to show you beauty is in the eye of the beholder. As a PR62, I like this coin quite a bit and would be very happy to have it in my collection.
I think it boils down to budget and desire to own this date. I have neither. I think it's a decent looking coin. It really doesn't look beat up for a 62.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
For a 65, no. I'm not sure why people are having a hard time with it.
That being said, when you're looking at price guide differences, it's only a 20% difference in price to get a 64, so maybe it's smarter to get a nice 64 for not much more money (comparatively speaking, I know it's another 10k)
Highly desirable rare coin with pricetag to match... I think the toning (haze) is what's holding this particular piece back. The TV shows darker fields... and I would hope the mirrored fields are more evident with coin in hand. The cheek is remarkably free from contact marks... for a 62.
I like it... but like most things in life... depending on the price... for a 5-figure coin...
Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
Comments
Seeing that this coin sold for $57,600 in 7/23 against a $75,000 value will tell you something...........
Still a very rare bird
Good luck
Mike
My Indians
Danco Set
Nice, desirable key date Morgan. My collection, probably just about everyone else on this forum, will never be complete...always upgrading.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
1895's come extremely well made, and while expensive, they are not that hard to find. The price curve is so flat for these, that unless you are in love with the look of that one, I would wait and get a nicer looking one.
I would be willing to bet it wouldn’t be the last coin you would buy. You’re never finished
Lafayette Grading Set
So your collection is Morgan proofs rather than business strikes?
My collection consists of mostly keys & semi keys Mercs, WLHs & Morgan dollars.
I was asking the forum to give me their thoughts on it.
For a PR62 I guess it is fine, below are the HA images (top set) and PCGS TV (bottom)-
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Meh
i would hold out for a nicer one if the budget allows.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
I sure as hell wouldn't kick that coin out of my collection.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I wouldn't either, but if looking for one for my collection I would try for one thats a little bit nicer.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
I’d be really happy with that one. Many people who collect business strike Morgans like to add the 1895 proof, because of the fact that no business strikes were made in Philadelphia that year. I understand the thought process and it makes sense. 👍
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I can think of thousands of coins I would rather own. Of course, too many to mention here.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
Hard to tell from the photo. Proof coins not easy to view on a screen.
Just a thought, crack it out, give it a professional dip. It just might release the deep mirrors hidden below the tarnish......
Mike
My Indians
Danco Set
I've found the coin I've been wanting to buy for the last eight years, but it's in strong hands and not going anywhere. And it's not the kind of coin I can just happen to find.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
The $64,000.00 question. My thoughts ? Less than perfect, greater than lackluster , highly desirable and out of my reach.
Ever a hole. Always a spot.
To fill or not to fill ? That is the question.
I like it!
You have big cojones.
This thread goes to show you beauty is in the eye of the beholder. As a PR62, I like this coin quite a bit and would be very happy to have it in my collection.
I think it boils down to budget and desire to own this date. I have neither. I think it's a decent looking coin. It really doesn't look beat up for a 62.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
It's easier to do it with someone else's 5 figure coin.
Reminds me of my 1896 in a way.


Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
For a 62 that's a great looking coin!
For a 65, no. I'm not sure why people are having a hard time with it.
That being said, when you're looking at price guide differences, it's only a 20% difference in price to get a 64, so maybe it's smarter to get a nice 64 for not much more money (comparatively speaking, I know it's another 10k)
I'm BACK!!! Used to be Billet7 on the old forum.
Highly desirable rare coin with pricetag to match... I think the toning (haze) is what's holding this particular piece back. The TV shows darker fields... and I would hope the mirrored fields are more evident with coin in hand. The cheek is remarkably free from contact marks... for a 62.
I like it... but like most things in life... depending on the price... for a 5-figure coin...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Not a fan of the muted luster but still looks super clean for a 62.
I'd take it for the price.
Very nice large images from Heritage, @TomB !
Here are the large TVs: