Options
GTG - REVEALED One of the Trickiest Morgans I've Ever Seen
FlyingAl
✭✭✭✭✭
I was contacted recently by a well established collector who wishes to remain anonymous who wanted me to image this particular piece. I was given permission to do a GTG, so good luck!
19
Comments
68+
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
66
Nevermind, I see that the top pop is 67+ so I want to change my guess to that. Looks damn good though!
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
Why so low?
I’ll go with 67+, and would have guessed higher if any had graded higher.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Wow, the luster pops on that baby!
Edited to add: after another look, I’m going with 67-67+.
Great looking coin!
This was recently holdered, so the pops may or may not be current.
Coin Photography
Well, like @MFeld my initial impression was "better than 67+", so if that's a possibility I would keep it at 68+. I don't even see a hit or a hairline on the coin anywhere, and it looks like its screaming with luster. I don't know what would hold it back from 68 unless it was graded 30 years ago or if the images were deceptive.
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
MS 67...the picture looks like a 68 but I'm hedging (plus this isn't a date you tend to see even in 67 let alone higher)
Very nice, I'll go 68. Edited to add, I didn't see 67+ was the highest grade for that date.
67+ But my gut tells me that this is one of those trick questions the op is known for.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I want to say 67 or 67+ because of the date/mint but based on the photos I don't see any reason it shouldn't be a 68.
I'm going to say 68
67+ cac
Cheek looks weird, like rubbed with a sock? I’ve seen this look on gold before and it normally deducts 1 point. Reverse eagle has a few problems/ticks as well. The somewhat strange lighting in the photo doesn’t help.
Pops are updated every working weekday at around midnight pacific time, so unless this thing was graded and returned and photographed on a Saturday, current pops should be accurate.
With that eye appeal it has to be a plus, so I will agree with 68+. Wow, what a gorgeous Morgan.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Without reading the replies, I thought the image looked like a MS68, so will stay with that.
Louis Armstrong
It looks kissed by anacs.
67+ beaned, yes!
With that said I'm going MS68
Dan
You are right on, not a mark to be found
Mike
My Indians
Dansco Set
67 with cac sticker
68 or even better.
Damn that is stellar!
bob
vegas, baby!
67+, that's a super nice one!
Collector, occasional seller
Ms67
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
That’s a WOWSER.
67.
68+
Mr_Spud
Altered Surfaces
Having fun while switching things up and focusing on a next level PCGS slabbed 1950+ type set, while still looking for great examples for the 7070.
Going to guess 67+. Man, that is absolutely worthy of the statement "one of the nicest Morgans I've ever seen"!
That is a superb Morgan Dollar. I would guess the grade to be 69.
The only miniscule marks I could find were in the right and left laurel leaves. You wouldn't see them with the naked eye.
This is one stunner of a coin.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS88
My gut is that this is a trick post and there is a microscopic patch of hairlines we can’t see in the photo. That could also just be my cynicism.
Based on what we see, if this had been an 1881-S, I would have guessed MS69. Since it is a better date, I would have said 68 or if the graders were particularly harsh 67+ without cheating.
Should be 67/67+
67+
Thank you. While I see the coin very differently from the way you do, I very much appreciate you taking the time to reply.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
67+ and bean
Looks to be 68 easily.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
68 Absolutely pristine
Wow! Stunning! Looks like a 68 to me.
https://www.smallcopperguy.com
What's the ding on the throat?
It's part of the design. Take a look at a few other Morgan's.
Steve
My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
MS68
However I now see PCGS has graded no 1891-S higher than MS67+
67+ all day long
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
Going with the crowd, MS67+. Very Beautiful coin! Interesting, I just bought a 1891-CC yesterday at the San Jose Coin Expo.
I believe I see a bag mark on the reverse (approx. 4 o'clock position) between America and Dollar, as well as a few on the obverse lower throat area.
If the coin appears to be a 68 to many here, there must be a reason why it's not registered as a 68. I'm then going to say a Details/ Questionable Color.
The angular second picture or "reveal" tells the tale of the grade. Totally AU
, but a nice coin.
The GTG is an MS 65 coin "purple is dried dip residue" Again another nice coin
65
You're looking at two different coins entirely.
Yes, I am !
Furthermore I said so.
You see a pouncing with a cognitive bias , but you do not comprehend what I wrote
Thank you Please come again
67+
67
68 was my guess. But if 67+ is the highest, it must be that.
I have a 67+ but this looks cleaner.
My YouTube Channel
67+