@johnny9434 said:
Why no half dollar? Just wondering
I have a bunch of similar mint set errors that came out of a dealer estate. QC at the mint US not perfect. You will find missing coins, substituted coins, etc. It is pretty scarce, but it happens.
@johnny9434 said:
Why no half dollar? Just wondering
I have a bunch of similar mint set errors that came out of a dealer estate. QC at the mint US not perfect. You will find missing coins, substituted coins, etc. It is pretty scarce, but it happens.
@johnny9434 said:
Why no half dollar? Just wondering
I have a bunch of similar mint set errors that came out of a dealer estate. QC at the mint US not perfect. You will find missing coins, substituted coins, etc. It is pretty scarce, but it happens.
No. I have seen errors like this before. I once had a set that had a piece of string in it shipped to me directly from the mint.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@XpipedreamR said:
What's going on with the nickel in the Denver package? It looks like it's missing a chunk. How many times did lightning strike this mint set?
I would not be surprised. I go through thousands and thousands and thousands of 1950-64 proof sets a year, and have seen a number of things like this, all in untampered, original packaging. The mint is a production facility, things happen.
A couple of my favorites from times past were a 69 mint set with a decent sized bread crumb sealed in with one of the coins, and a 74 proof set with a wood fragment from having been "bonked" with a piece of wood and mallet used to seat the coins in their slots.
A Denver dime in the '69 Philly packet is a common error. I've seen four or five of them at least.
I know they exist; that's still no guarantee that these are original. I just think this set and the set in the OP both look fishy. Combine that with the fact that this guy doesn't even know that pre-82 cents weren't "coated"... no thanks.
Comments
I think legit.
bob
I also think legit.
Why no half dollar? Just wondering
I have a bunch of similar mint set errors that came out of a dealer estate. QC at the mint US not perfect. You will find missing coins, substituted coins, etc. It is pretty scarce, but it happens.
Now I know, t.y.
Plus mint errors.
Someone posted a mint set that had 2 dimes in the space where 1 dime belongs. Stuff happens.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
That be me. 😂
Especially in philly! 😉
This area looked tampered with to me. I could be wrong.
I don't see anything unusual there. And if you look at the top part, you can see the edge marks on the plastic which look authentic.
Roger that, thanks!
No. I have seen errors like this before. I once had a set that had a piece of string in it shipped to me directly from the mint.
What's going on with the nickel in the Denver package? It looks like it's missing a chunk. How many times did lightning strike this mint set?
Looks like it could be a little clip doesn't it?
Long time no see.
I would not be surprised. I go through thousands and thousands and thousands of 1950-64 proof sets a year, and have seen a number of things like this, all in untampered, original packaging. The mint is a production facility, things happen.
Yep... Other issues with mint sets have been reported here over the years. Cheers, RickO
A couple of my favorites from times past were a 69 mint set with a decent sized bread crumb sealed in with one of the coins, and a 74 proof set with a wood fragment from having been "bonked" with a piece of wood and mallet used to seat the coins in their slots.
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
The 1968 do not strike P halves. Only Denver. Another false mentions on eBay.
NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT.
FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL.
THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.
MARK TWAIN
I have one with a rock, pebble or stone in the mint set. Didn't know the mint packaging room was a construction site! 😂
Or maybe it's rock cocaine! 🤣 🤣 Who know what's happening at the Philly mint these days. 😉
Yes it does.
Good eye! 👍🏻
The set is NOT missing a half dollar as no 1968 Philadelphia halves were minted. The set is complete and contains one extra cent.
This seller has alot of error sets in his listings.
HAPPY COLLECTING
I messaged him about it and he corrected the listing.
Here's another error mint set... this one looks fishy. I'm wondering if this guy has a heat sealer...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/334816439468?hash=item4df49d6cac:g:QYYAAOSwj5VkKdFf
He also apparently knows nothing about coins. Case in point:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/234955887426?hash=item36b4765342:g:EKIAAOSwSPdkKcRR
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
The S mint nickels is normal.
A Denver dime in the '69 Philly packet is a common error. I've seen four or five of them at least.
I know they exist; that's still no guarantee that these are original. I just think this set and the set in the OP both look fishy. Combine that with the fact that this guy doesn't even know that pre-82 cents weren't "coated"... no thanks.
RIP Mom- 1932-2012