Conservation - Before and After
Recently mailed (02-16-23) my SAC dollar struck on clad quarter planchet to NGC/NCS for crossover (any grade) and conservation. Received back today. Thoughts? Opinions?


Comments
-
Beautiful coin! MS66
1 -
Where did that black stuff under the eagle come from? Otherwise, it looks like they did a great job. Did the grade change when you crossed it?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire1 -
@PerryHall said:
Where did that black stuff under the eagle come from? Otherwise, it looks like they did a great job. Did the grade change when you crossed it?The “black stuff” is a rub
1 -
Looks pretty clean, although the toning hid the black spots on her neck. Did it come back as a 66?
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
1 -
I like it.
Overall, it looks better- like what a clad quarter in GEM condition would look like.1 -
@PerryHall said:
Where did that black stuff under the eagle come from? Otherwise, it looks like they did a great job. Did the grade change when you crossed it?Some type of die flaw (lighting angle). Took a big chance, but was PCGS 67 now NGC 67.
0 -
Yeah, the neck spots are visible in both images and the black spot just looks like a scuff and can be seen in both images. I don't think it looks better or worse in either image, so I'd call it a wash since it crossed at the same grade.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin
1 -
I hesitate to show these images because many would prefer the Before. But, trust me, it was dull and brown and now it's Beautiful!

5 -
I prefer the “before”, as it shows character and is distinct-looking.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
5 -
Whatever the mark under the eagle is, it shows up on other examples from past auctions. AS if they were "made" at the same time.
0 -
@wozymodo said:
I hesitate to show these images because many would prefer the Before. But, trust me, it was dull and brown and now it's Beautiful!I agree. It is greatly improved. Some consider "dull and brown" to be "character" but it hurts the eye appeal of a modern coin.

Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire3 -
It’s just a personal preference and my guess is that a majority would prefer the “after”. Additionally, I think you raised an excellent point about the “before” appearance defeating the purpose.👍
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
1 -
I’m intrigued as to why you did the conservation with NGC since it was in a pcgs holder?
It’s rather difficult to get pcgs to grade sac errors ms67, so they clearly liked this coin originally. I would have let pcgs conserve it, and see if it would have bumped up to a 67+ or a 68. If it came back as a 67 again, then I’d have crossed to NGC if I had to have it in that holder.
2 -
I like the NGC insert it put the weight information on it.
2 -
@1madman said:
I’m intrigued as to why you did the conservation with NGC since it was in a pcgs holder?It’s rather difficult to get pcgs to grade sac errors ms67, so they clearly liked this coin originally. I would have let pcgs conserve it, and see if it would have bumped up to a 67+ or a 68. If it came back as a 67 again, then I’d have crossed to NGC if I had to have it in that holder.
Already a member of NGC before joining this forum a few months ago (not yet a member of PCGS). Also have a registry set of Errors I'm working on at NGC.
https://coins.www.collectors-society.com/wcm/CoinCustomSetGallery.aspx?s=32613
I'm sure PCGS conservation would have done excellent as well.0 -
@MFeld said:
I prefer the “before”, as it shows character and is distinct-looking.I agree and apologize to the OP for this, but I like the originality of the 'before' (sorry)...........
My online coin store - https://desertmoonnm.com/1
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.5K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 60 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum





