1885 Liberty Nickel won at auction. All the black surfaces you see are actually Bright Luster.

Options
«1

Comments

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    don't see any PL in the price guide so this is a proof. cam or dcam. not sure from the images.

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Cecilturtle7
    Options

    Regular Strike

  • Cecilturtle7
    Options

    Was in a safe for over 80 years. Supposedly

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Unfortunately, if/when the pictures are that different from what the coin really looks like, they don’t serve any good purpose.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • FlyingAl
    FlyingAl Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    This seller has been discussed in detail. They have been known to polish or clean coins and then massively “juice” the contrast on their photos. Some offerings are not cleaned or polished but this is not a seller I’d take any chances on.

  • dbldie55
    dbldie55 Posts: 7,753 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Let us know when you get it back from PCGS.

    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • Connecticoin
    Connecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @dbldie55 said:
    Let us know when you get it back from PCGS.

    More likely it will be going back to the seller.

  • clarkbar04
    clarkbar04 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Trick photography. Avoid this seller at all cost. I bet it was "fresh from a roll" too.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • justmenutty72
    justmenutty72 Posts: 394 ✭✭✭
    Options

    Canyon city 👌

  • airplanenut
    airplanenut Posts: 22,763 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I imagine it takes more work to make a photo that bad than to just take a decent one. And that makes me suspect it was done on purpose...

    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • tcollects
    tcollects Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    imagine spending your time selling this crud

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Cecilturtle7 said:
    Regular Strike

    It's a proof, which is cheaper for an 1885. Return it if you can. [Unless you paid $500 for it]

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 25, 2022 5:26PM
    Options

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:
    don't see any PL in the price guide so this is a proof. cam or dcam. not sure from the images.

    Edited for accuracy.

    Need about a 66 DCAM to make it worth the money

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:
    don't see any PL in the price guide so this is a proof. cam or dcam. not sure from the images.

    No DCAM known according to greysheet.

    .
    .
    this is what i was going by.

    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/detail/liberty-nickel/82/most-active/pr

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 25, 2022 5:11PM
    Options

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:
    don't see any PL in the price guide so this is a proof. cam or dcam. not sure from the images.

    No DCAM known according to greysheet.

    .
    .
    this is what i was going by.

    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/detail/liberty-nickel/82/most-active/pr

    Interesting. I should check the pops.

    Pops say 20. Wonder why there's no greysheet bid

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • spyglassdesign
    spyglassdesign Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I hope you have a way to return. I would never spend $4k on a coin with that bad of photography without it.

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    lol

    i thought doing a comp of a ms vs pf but ya, that was absolutely no help.

    the 2 coins i comped looked to be identical in positional diagnostics w/o going completely crazy with it.

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Interesting. I should check the pops.

    Pops say 20. Wonder why there's no greysheet bid

    i haven't seen the new greysheets in a while (12-18 months?) (whatever the newest looks like) so i can't say.

    with the old sheets, whether or not the proof prices would be found next to the business strike price seemed to be a complete crap shoot. some were, some weren't with no real logical arrangement i could ever figure out other than space.

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • tincup
    tincup Posts: 5,481 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'm thinking proof also. Do you have the coin in hand? What was your purpose for posting the coin here... were you already unsure of it?

    ----- kj
  • thebeav
    thebeav Posts: 4,115 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'm going to start photographing my coins with my Kodak 'Brownie' camera.......

  • Connecticoin
    Connecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @TomB said:
    Sure looks like a proof to me, and if I recall correctly they are less valuable than MS business strikes for the date.

    Yup, and probably hairlined enough to get a details grade. If that is the case hopefully the OP will return it, otherwise will be buried in a coin worth half or less of what was paid.

  • Cecilturtle7
    Options

    I sent the coin off to be graded by PCGS. It is not a DCAM. The photographs are deceiving. Bright Luster. I bought the coin to have it graded and sold. GC is handling and it. I will let you know the grade no matter what it comes back

  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Cecilturtle7 ... That is a big gamble.... Best of luck, hope it works out for you. Cheers, RickO

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Cecilturtle7 said:
    I sent the coin off to be graded by PCGS. It is not a DCAM. The photographs are deceiving. Bright Luster. I bought the coin to have it graded and sold. GC is handling and it. I will let you know the grade no matter what it comes back

    Ugh.

    Good luck.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Connecticoin
    Connecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Yeah if GC thinks it is hairlined enough such that it will get a details grade, it can probably still be returned on ebay as "significantly not as described", but since it was purchased on July 10, that window is closing fast.

  • calgolddiver
    calgolddiver Posts: 1,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    good luck with that ...

    Top 15 Type Set 1792 to present

    Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set

    successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), DesertMoon, Downtown1974, Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Proofcollection, Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)

  • Cecilturtle7
    Options

    I sent the coins to see GC. They have them raw and are choosing what to do

  • Cecilturtle7
    Options

    What I meant to say was I sent the coins to GC first and they didn't kick any of them back. including the 1885 and believe me if it had a problem they would have sent it back as they always do if there is an issue

  • PhilLynott
    PhilLynott Posts: 900 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    You are a mad man Cecil. If the less than 1% chance where this is a profitable endeavor for you happens it may actually be the worst thing for you in the long run since you won't learn the lesson you need to from this.

    Good luck though would be a real cinderella story!

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Cecilturtle7 said:
    I sent the coin off to be graded by PCGS. It is not a DCAM. The photographs are deceiving. Bright Luster. I bought the coin to have it graded and sold. GC is handling and it. I will let you know the grade no matter what it comes back

    .
    just curious. you have the funds to buy $4k coins (according to prior post) but not have any type of camera?

    if you recognized the seller's photos to be essentially intentionally misleading then you knew we'd also struggle, so why not provide, even mediocre pics of your own? in the future, i'd prefer you at least try. thanks

    OR

    was the intent of this thread to just be an BOLO for this seller and their fraudulent images?

    i tend to be a digger to get underneath and understand things so i'm naturally curious. did you buy this coin from those images thinking it was a DCAM or a business strike. if the latter, how could you arrive to that conclusion from the images and risk that much money on a coin that will almost certainly not work out? appreciate you sharing your thought process here as i am all for creative and uncommon solutions, that will usually even defy the odds.

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • jesbroken
    jesbroken Posts: 11,252 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Do yourself a longterm favor. Return the coin immediately upon realizing it is not what you bought. If purchased on ebay you will have no problem returning it if the auction said business strike or regular strike. You will own a small portion of your purchase price with no recourse later. Welcome to the forum and good luck.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Cecilturtle7 said:
    What I meant to say was I sent the coins to GC first and they didn't kick any of them back. including the 1885 and believe me if it had a problem they would have sent it back as they always do if there is an issue

    You made a faulty assumption. The coin would merit grading, regardless of its condition. So GC wouldn’t have any reason to “send it back” unless they were aware of the situation and/or you asked for their opinion in it.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Project Numismatics
    Project Numismatics Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Bold (and foolish) move buying a raw $4,000 coin sight unseen from a source that’s been flagged on this forum many times in the past.

    Not something to brag about or encourage other collectors to do.

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Cecilturtle7 said:
    What I meant to say was I sent the coins to GC first and they didn't kick any of them back. including the 1885 and believe me if it had a problem they would have sent it back as they always do if there is an issue

    The only "issue" is that it is a proof and worth far less than you paid for it.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • yspsales
    yspsales Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 26, 2022 11:38AM
    Options

    There is a reason for juiced images,

    There is a reason each and every one of their auctions show the same contrast in their coins.

    There is a reason for 104 bids on a generic coin from a meh series.

    There is a reason for $4000 coin not being slabbed by a major grader.

    I mean... 104 bids on a Liberty Nickel with no hidden varieties?

    Setting aside my moderate numismatic skills (Top pop to my name), I've shot hundreds of weddings, sports events, coins over the past 20 years.

    Close to 500K images... I can manipulate just about anything without photoshop.

    You just paid tuition...

    We all pay tuition.

    Welcome to the club.

    I honestly hope you wise up and return the coin.

    You have been taken to school, and alot of your classmates with no interest in the outcome are advising you to return the coin.

    If you can afford a $4000 coin and laugh off the outcome, you are smart enough to know when you are the mark.

    BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out

  • spyglassdesign
    spyglassdesign Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @yspsales said:

    You just paid tuition...

    We all pay tuition.

    Welcome to the club.

    I just took it in the shorts on a coin, but for a small fraction of this purchase. I wish I had that much money to gamble with...

    Like you said... tuition can be economical or expensive. While my last bite at the apple was pricey, this tuition may certainly take the cake. In all honesty I hope he proves everyone wrong... for his sake. Doubtful though, as many of the people here see things that us newbs don't even if they don't always say exactly what/why, even in bad photography. I can attest to this personally.

    I just hope he isn't putting his economic situation in jeopardy for this kind of gamble...

  • golden
    golden Posts: 10,534 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Oh my!

  • justmenutty72
    justmenutty72 Posts: 394 ✭✭✭
    Options

    Call me crazy but I think everything’s going to work out fine for him.

  • davewesen
    davewesen Posts: 6,981 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Interesting you are happy with transaction. I am thinking it will take 6 months to lose over half your money, that's not too bad.

  • clarkbar04
    clarkbar04 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    If money is no object why even do this at all? It’s going to take 4-5 months to find out you’ve been had.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file